Rand Corporation Report Says the Iraq War Was Shrubbie's Biggest Blunder

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're just a poor plucking chicken dick plucker, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp.

Are you a second class cocksucker pecker puffer? Do you have to draw unemployment to make ends meet? Still working the glory hole for meals pecker puffer?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Are you a second class cocksucker pecker puffer? Do you have to draw unemployment to make ends meet? Still working the glory hole for meals pecker puffer?

No one draws flies the way a poor plucking chicken dick plucker like you draws flies, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

The only good thing that came out of the entire fiasco was the end of Saddam and his two reprehensible Sons, who by all accounts were just as brutal, if not more so, than the Patriarch of the a regime.

Was it worth it. Trading a murdering regime that kills in the name of power for one that kills you in the name of religion seems to be a wash.

"Seems to be a wash?" I beg to differ!

There is no way in hell that Saddam was worth the loss 4500+ American lives, tens of thousands more injured/maimed and at a financial cost of $1 trillion.

End of sentence!

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by bigtex

"Seems to be a wash?" I beg to differ!

There is no way in hell that Saddam was worth the loss 4500+ American lives, tens of thousands more injured/maimed and at a financial cost of $1 trillion.

End of sentence!

You took that wrong. I meant that after all our efforts and deaths, Iraq will still be a shit hole that we should have never got involved with in the first place.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

You took that wrong. I meant that after all our efforts and deaths, Iraq will still be a shit hole that we should have never got involved with in the first place.

Jackie, I apologize for having misunderstood your remarks.

I agree, Iraq was a shit hole before the ill fated and ill advised spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq.

It has been a shit hole since the invasion.

There is no reason to believe that it will be anything other than a shit hole in the foreseeable future.

What in the hell was Shrub/Darth thinking?

Bottom Line: The decision to invade Iraq during the spring of 2003 proved to be the absolute worst US foreign policy decision since the Vietnam War.

End of sentence, again!

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

No one draws flies the way a poor plucking chicken dick plucker like you draws flies, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp.

Nothing more pathetic than a peter puffer on welfare, because he is so poor at his job. Unemployed peter puffer, and first runner up in the DOTY poll.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Nothing more pathetic than a peter puffer on welfare, because he is so poor at his job. Unemployed peter puffer, and first runner up in the DOTY poll.

Rumor has that Eatkum the Inbred Chimp is a plucking chicken dick plucker without peer.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by bigtex

There is no way in hell that Saddam was worth the loss 4500+ American lives, tens of thousands more injured/maimed and at a financial cost of $1 trillion.

Isn't it reassuring to know littledix has appointed himself the ultimate judge of which US wars are worth what level of sacrifice?

Why don't we rephrase?

There is no way in hell that ridding the world of Hitler and Tojo was worth the loss of 405,000 American lives, another 670,000 more wounded and at a financial cost of over $4 trillion in today's dollars.

So littledix, do you agree now? What does your finely calibrated compass for stacking the human/financial costs of each war against what each war is "worth" say about that one?

.

[Yssup Rider]

Great job IBJunior. You've now come out against the US's involvement in WWII after Pearl Harbor.

You're learning from your "sponsor."

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Great job IBJunior. You've now come out against the US's involvement in WWII after Pearl Harbor.

I did no such thing, fucktard. Of course I wasn't talking to you anyway. If I want any monkey shit out of you I'll squeeze your head. Now run along and let the littledix wrestle with it. He seems to think he is well qualified to make such judgments.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Rumor has that Eatkum the Inbred Chimp is a plucking chicken dick plucker without peer.

No one would know more about chicken plucking than a peter puffer with a chicken dick. Fact. Peter puffer hankering is a chicken dick plucking champ..

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Isn't it reassuring to know littledix has appointed himself the ultimate judge of which US wars are worth what level of sacrifice?

With copius amounts of "truth serum" you would discover it has nothing to do with the loss of lives or the costs ... it has to do with Bush.

We lost almost 4,000 lives in less than an hour based on years of planning after one somewhat failed attempt and numerous attacks on U.S. interests and people under the "stewardship" of BigTits favorite .... Clinton. Not a peep from BigTits.

Unless BigTits wants to marginalize the loss of civilian life as "collateral damage"!

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Isn't it reassuring to know littledix has appointed himself the ultimate judge of which US wars are worth what level of sacrifice?

Why don't we rephrase?

There is no way in hell that ridding the world of Hitler and Tojo was worth the loss of 405,000 American lives, another 670,000 more wounded and at a financial cost of over $4 trillion in today's dollars.

So littledix, do you agree now? What does your finely calibrated compass for stacking the human/financial costs of each war against what each war is "worth" say about that one?

.

LLIdiot (part 2), during the Spring of 2003, the #1 enemy to the US was al Qaeda, not Saddam and/or Iraq. President Shrub lost focus upon the perpetrators of 9/11 when he authorized the ill fated and ill advised invasion of Iraq. As a result of Shrubbie's historic misculation, America lost 4500+ lives and did so at a cost of $1 trillion.

In a risk vs. rewards scenario, the risk of losing 4500+ American lives at an eventual cost of $1 trillion was not worth Saddam's life. Had your favorite Shrub maintained his focus upon the perpetrators of 9/11, the potential reward (at the time) to the US of OBL's life and/or a dagger in al Qaeda's heart was much greater than that of Saddam's life, especially when you factor in what proved to be the prolonged war in Iraq.

From my perspective, the invasion of Iraq was a huge mistake of historic proportions. It is quite apparent in the report shared by the Rand Corporation, they were not fond of the Iraq risk vs reward either. Why don't you bitch and moan to them!

Idiot!

Over and out!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bigtex

Why don't you bitch and moan to them!

I'm not "bitching" and "moaning" .... you are!

Of course, you have 20-20 xray hindsight with which you can see 6,000 miles.

Do you call all the weekend games right on Monday morning, or most of them?

And you call me an "idiot"? You are the idiot poster boy of deflection.

So, while your Man's "ratings" or going up in December, he's getting back into the Iraqi countryside for more "war"? That's what happens when one retreats.

Ask the French. You are an "IDIOTIC-OLD-FOOL" ... with a broken record mind.

More foolishness ... "the #1 enemy to the US was al Qaeda" ... "alert"

.. "the #1 enemy to the US" ("al Qaeda") ..

... just recently slaughtered 140 children and teachers ON YOUR MAN'S WATCH!

How many Christian, children, women, and men, have died while he was working on his golf game by the "junior varsity" boys in Iraq? tens of thousands? or just 1,000's?

Or was that Bush's fault too?

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I'm not "bitching" and "moaning" .... you are!

Since you brought it up, my previous post was not directed at the Patriarch of the Idiot Klan, errr Clan (LLIdiot). Instead it was directed at one of his Idiot offspring (lustylad, AKA LLIdiot part 2). For further proof, check out who I actually quoted. It certainly was not you!

Idiot!

Had you actually read the two posts, it should have been quite obvious. Instead, you jumped to a false conclusion. Which is something that the entire Idiot Klan, errrr Clan is quite adept at. Using the ill fated and ill advised spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq as a reference point, it is something that you and your Idiot offspring have been doing for years.

Idiot's!