Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
That shit right there is why you can't have nice things
Quote:
Originally Posted by VerySkeptical
You're wrong. Again.
The legal wire tap you're referring to was on the Russian ambassador's phone. And it caught that lying bastard Flynn...
Screw your thinking cap on (please use 4" Torx screws and an impact driver) for a second, before you engage your keyboard - though I expect you have the same issue with your yapper.
Your theory (it cannot be conceived as logic) is essentially:
a military General,
with 20+ years experience
working in the Intelligence services
was talking on an open line phone
to a Russian Ambassador
as The President elect's Intel representative
and he did not think it would be freaking monitored!!! Seriously?!?
Yet you wonder why people cannot take you seriously. What a yutz
Screw your thinking cap on (please use 4" Torx screws and an impact driver) for a second, before you engage your keyboard - though I expect you have the same issue with your yapper.
Your theory (it cannot be conceived as logic) is essentially:
a military General,
with 20+ years experience
working in the Intelligence services
was talking on an open line phone
to a Russian Ambassador
as The President elect's Intel representative
and he did not think it would be freaking monitored!!! Seriously?!?
Yet you wonder why people cannot take you seriously. What a yutz
And he lied about the conversation and it’s content anyway.
In Trump's $75M lawsuit vs. Hillary he's putting a spotlight on Durham’s indictments and filings.
He does not go beyond anything Durham and Horowitz (IG Report) have revealed.
Trump's going to force the fake news to keep talking about the issues they’ve already spun and dismissed.
[They] will call Trump and anons liars and conspiracy theorists.
But Trump's lawsuit will lay out the whole RICO conspiracy in exhaustive detail including the private spying on Trump Tower, his apartment and the Oval Office.
Trump will get them all on the record during discovery. These swamp rats will all be required to give sworn testimony under oath. But perjury will be the least of their concerns. These criminals are fighting to save their very lives!
This is a MOAB (Mother of all B��MBS) and much, MUCH MOAR is Coming.
Trumpy sues another can't win. That's like saying trumpy shit on his devoted cartel again and they ate it up
Durham lol n omg n what a waste. Just milking the taxpayers and hoping something falls in his lap...you know a Ken (raping Baylor head) milked the taxpayers for years and an ignorant no life biotch fell in his lap
Theory?
You're full of shit. Flynn was busted because he was stupid. I couldn't care less whether you believe me or not. You believe in Trump's voter fraud theory. Flynn's guilt is established and proven.
Here is the final paragraph from the WSJ article.
"During those calls, Mr. Flynn discussed the potential easing of U.S. sanctions imposed on Russia after the Trump administration came to power in January, current and former officials said at the time, citing transcripts of intercepted communications between Mr. Flynn and Mr. Kislyak." https://www.wsj.com/articles/mike-fl...fbi-1512138539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do
Screw your thinking cap on (please use 4" Torx screws and an impact driver) for a second, before you engage your keyboard - though I expect you have the same issue with your yapper.
Your theory (it cannot be conceived as logic) is essentially:
a military General,
with 20+ years experience
working in the Intelligence services
was talking on an open line phone
to a Russian Ambassador
as The President elect's Intel representative
and he did not think it would be freaking monitored!!! Seriously?!?
And not only all the things you mentioned, but a transition team member told Flynn the line was tapped.
All the reasons you pointed out prove how stupid Flynn is. His lying is the only charge they pursued. They also could have charged him for not registering as a foreign agent.
Instead of flapping your gums about me you should have STFU and pulled your head out of your ass. Who cares what you and your Trumpys think about me. You're a lying nobody. That why you don't like links and why I do. They are the truth's friend and the Trumpy's enemy. Funny how your logic isn't supported by the facts.
Yet you wonder why people cannot take you seriously. What a yutz
Federal judge: Trump and lawyer John Eastman likely committed crimes in attempt to overturn election
David Knowles
Summary
In this article:
A federal judge ruled Monday that then-President Donald Trump and lawyer John Eastman "more likely than not" committed crimes in their efforts to obstruct the certification of Joe Biden's victory in the 2020 election.
The extraordinary ruling by U.S. District Court Judge David Carter ordered Eastman to turn over 101 emails to the House's Jan. 6 select committee. Eastman, who had argued that the emails were protected by attorney-client privilege, formulated a legal strategy to keep Trump in office and pressured then-Vice President Mike Pence to reject the Electoral College count showing Trump had lost to Biden.
In a blistering 44-page ruling, Carter laid out a meticulous timeline of Trump's efforts to convince elected officials and the public of his bogus claim that his loss to Biden was attributable to election fraud. The ruling, which can be appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court, will no doubt raise expectations on Attorney General Merrick Garland to launch a Justice Department investigation of the former president that could result in criminal charges.
"President Trump and Dr. Eastman justified the plan with allegations of election fraud — but President Trump likely knew the justification was baseless, and therefore that the entire plan was unlawful," Carter wrote.
Carter was especially critical of the legal justification used by Trump and Eastman to challenge the 2020 election results, and noted the mountain of evidence that showed the election had not been marred by fraud that had any bearing on the outcome.
"In the months following the election, numerous credible sources — from the President’s inner circle to agency leadership to statisticians — informed President Trump and Dr. Eastman that there was no evidence of election fraud," Carter wrote, adding, "An internal Trump Campaign memo concluded in November that fraud claims related to Dominion voting machines were baseless."
Carter continued: "In early December, Attorney General [William] Barr publicly stated there was no evidence of fraud, and on December 27, Deputy Attorney General [Richard] Donoghue privately told President Trump that after 'dozens of investigations, hundreds of interviews,' the Department of Justice had concluded that 'the major allegations [of election fraud] are not supported by the evidence developed.' Still, President Trump repeatedly urged that 'the Department [of Justice] should publicly say that the election is corrupt or suspect or not reliable.' By early January, more than sixty court cases alleging fraud had been dismissed for lack of evidence or lack of standing."
The Jan. 6 select committee, which is investigating the riot at the U.S. Capitol that was carried out in an attempt to disrupt the certification of Biden's win over Trump, had sought the emails Eastman had sent laying out the plan he and Trump knew to be illegal, Carter said.
"Based on the evidence, the Court finds that it is more likely than not that President Trump and Dr. Eastman dishonestly conspired to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2021," the judge wrote.
Trump and Eastman, a former clerk to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, have fought to keep their records from being turned over to the Jan. 6 panel. In January, however, the Supreme Court rejected arguments made by Trump's lawyers that the National Archives could withhold hundreds of pages of documents from the committee.
Theory?...
"During those calls, Mr. Flynn discussed the potential easing of U.S. sanctions imposed on Russia after the Trump administration came to power in January, current and former officials said at the time, citing transcripts of intercepted communications between Mr. Flynn and Mr. Kislyak."
How is that different from Joe Biden in an interview with the Council on Foreign Relations, in which he openly admits and boasts about how he got the Ukrainian president to dismiss the prosecutor who was investigating corruption in the gas company where his son Hunter Biden got a high paid job.
