Quote:
Originally Posted by DNinja69
The echo chamber continues. We are to believe he was targeted for being a Trump supporter and must also be exempt from responsibility for threats and acts when warrants were served also be he was a Trump supporter? Is that the defense? Just trying to understand the context of why we would ignore evidence in this particular case.
|
Please show exactly where I said he was targeted for being a Trump supporter. Because that is false
Please show where I said he is exempt from responsibility for online threats (as meaningless and harmless as they were). Because I never said that
Not sure what is so hard for you and others to understand that
1. While he may have posted stupid things online, they were no different than 1000's of others have done
2. Posting something stupid online should not be an invitation for the corrupt FBI to murder you (if it was we would have dead leftists everywhere given the crap they post)
3. Given his age, weight, health, immobility, etc he was no legitimate threat to carry out any assassination attempt of a President protected by the secret service and FBI
4. That the FBI's response - rolling up with a massive SWAT unit before dawn was egregious under the circumstances and designed to provoke a confrontation
5. Given that the FBI had been surveilling him for months, they knew his routine and knew he could easily be apprehended peacefully when he left his house to go to church, to go help a neighbor, etc for whatever the corrupt FBI wanted to charge him with for being cranky online
Why are you and others so bloodthirsty and inhumane to not only celebrate the man's death but to defend it when any reasonable person, including his neighbors, know it was unjustified and a massively egregious overstep by the corrupt FBI?