Quote:
Originally Posted by princeclubhopper
Also, it would help your credibility if you would learn the difference between “then” and “than”. Illiteracy exposes ignorance.
|
You're just throwing garbage to see what sticks. I make mistakes all the time and I do miss things when I proofread, but I didn't miss "then" and "than" in the post I just made.
If you're speaking from ignorance, that's fine. I'm not going to judge your arguments based on your grammar mistakes and I don't need to respond to your Help Wanted Ad Hominem in kind; your arguments fail all by themselves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by princeclubhopper
Okay, so why not just report to all uf us the safe locations, as also asked? No he, nor you, truly care about human trafficking. His white knight martyrdom is as transparent as Treetop’s. Pathetic and ignorant of any facts, as always. Save these women by saying where is safe and/or where is not safe to go. Either works. But lobbing general bombs does nothing but prove this is all conjecture with absolutely no basis in facts.
|
Your arguments do not appear to be thought through and your accusations are transparently self-serving.
There could be at least two reasons they are not indicating "safe" places:
1. By indicating the "safe" places, they'd be opening themselves up to disingenuous accusations of having a vested interest in whatever place they claimed to be "safe". It would be one thing if it were just personal reputation weighed against their main point, however, it
would certainly be used to distract from their main point. They are, quite wisely, avoiding that. Or should be, at least.
2. You realize that, even if "safe", you're asking them to point out places that may or may not be involved in Class A Misdemeanors? It would be naive to think that LE isn't reading these posts. Do you want to possibly put a legitimately licensed provider at risk by asking someone to suggest a safe place to practice the "hobby"? That's a very different sort of categorization than a review might provide, because, of course, all of the reviews are just fictions we create to help each other get through lonely nights.
You're either arguing in bad faith or you really haven't considered what you're asking.
What I would suggest is that you're just not willing to do the work, or the thinking, for yourself. I don't know you personally, I'm basing this on your approach to trying to discredit others so you can get information.
In order to get the information you want, you're accusing folks of not wanting to reduce trafficking. You're attempting to provoke someone into revealing a safe place where you can go to get your needs met to reduce the chance that you're supporting slavery. Laudable, but you're doing it without thinking about the people who would be put at risk by others sharing that information "publicly". Instead, you and the other chuckle-heads are attacking the people who are telling you that this is a real problem and that you need to do your own research and thinking on this.
To maintain your own suspension of disbelief, you and other chuckle-heads have established criteria in your minds that, if not satisfied 100%, will allow you to continue going to whatever place you like without having to give a thought as to whether or not there's trafficking involved. This is the lie you're telling yourselves because you're unwilling to do the research or walk out of a place that seems sketchy.
What is your argument against the idea of you doing your own research on human trafficking and deciding for yourself? Was your response of "you should share your information" the only "argument" you had? What part of "do your own research" do you not understand? Go think for yourself. Stop asking others to do even the
medium lifting and take responsibility for your own actions. It's not an unreasonable request.
Done here, unless you got something else other than ad hominem, grammar bullshit, or more terms you'd like to throw around to insult people who aren't giving you the answers you want to hear?
