Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 281
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70817
biomed163484
Yssup Rider61124
gman4453308
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48753
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42983
The_Waco_Kid37293
CryptKicker37225
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-27-2015, 05:25 PM   #46
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
Chicken dick the retarded chimp, you are the one chattering about Obama, why don't you cite where politifact rated his comment as you are the only inbred that thinks it is important. He isn't running..........Just your usual chimp hijack..
Are you suggesting that that bastion of infallible truth -- Politifact -- didn't give an appraisal of Odumbo's lie, 'If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor', Ekim the Inbred Chimp? That would mean that that bastion of infallible truth -- Politifact -- is biased in what they select to evaluate, doesn't it, Ekim the Inbred Chimp? Now go back to your veterinarian and get your distemper shot, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 06:07 PM   #47
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Are you suggesting that that bastion of infallible truth -- Politifact -- didn't give an appraisal of Odumbo's lie, 'If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor', Ekim the Inbred Chimp? That would mean that that bastion of infallible truth -- Politifact -- is biased in what they select to evaluate, doesn't it, Ekim the Inbred Chimp? Now go back to your veterinarian and get your distemper shot, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.
Got a link to that statement chicken dick the retarded chimp?
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 06:11 PM   #48
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
Got a link to that statement chicken dick the retarded chimp?
You're the jackass WK, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. As the WK for Politifact, it's your responsibility to demonstrate that Politifact isn't biased, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. So, cough up a link that doesn't have hairy balls attached, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, and show that Politifact gave an unbiased appraisal of Odumbo's lie, 'If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor'.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 06:22 PM   #49
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You're the jackass WK, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. As the WK for Politifact, it's your responsibility to demonstrate that Politifact isn't biased, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. So, cough up a link that doesn't have hairy balls attached, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, and show that Politifact gave an unbiased appraisal of Odumbo's lie, 'If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor'.
LMAO typical chicken dick the retarded chimp's MO, make an asinine comment then try to turn it around so he doesn't have to defend it. Don't have a link do you chicken dick? Not my responsibility to do your work for you.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 06:40 PM   #50
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
LMAO typical chicken dick the retarded chimp's MO, make an asinine comment then try to turn it around so he doesn't have to defend it. Don't have a link do you chicken dick? Not my responsibility to do your work for you.
You're the jackass that stupidly jumped into orbit to WK for Politifact, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. So, since you stupidly chose to be the WK for Politifact, it IS your responsibility to demonstrate that Politifact isn't biased, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. So, cough up a link that doesn't have hairy balls attached, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, and show that Politifact gave an unbiased appraisal of Odumbo's lie, 'If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor'.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 06:54 PM   #51
Rey Lengua
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 24, 2013
Location: Aqui !
Posts: 8,942
Encounters: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You're the jackass that stupidly jumped into orbit to WK for Politifact, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. So, since you stupidly chose to be the WK for Politifact, it IS your responsibility to demonstrate that Politifact isn't biased, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. So, cough up a link that doesn't have hairy balls attached, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, and show that Politifact gave an unbiased appraisal of Odumbo's lie, 'If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor'.
If it did have hairy balls attached to it , you can bet EKIM would beat the speed of light getting to it and trying to put a " lip lock " on it !!!
Rey Lengua is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 07:13 PM   #52
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
He isn't running, chicken dick the inbred chimp.
If you had bothered to look, Politifact is rating politicians (including Obama), personalities, and media people.

Take terrorism, 240 possible comments and only about six belong to Hillary because (like I said) she isn't making comments or taking questions.

Of course Politifact is not above being wrong. One statement was that the five Taliban generals were back on the battlefield afther the Bergdahl trade. Politifact said it was "pants on fire" because there was absolutely no truth to it. Except we are now faced with the proof that one of them has returned to the battlefield. No mea culpa from Politifact for being wrong. Like a I said, a left wing web site bought and paid for by the Tampa Bay paper.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 08:19 PM   #53
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
If you had bothered to look, Politifact is rating politicians (including Obama), personalities, and media people.

Take terrorism, 240 possible comments and only about six belong to Hillary because (like I said) she isn't making comments or taking questions.

Of course Politifact is not above being wrong. One statement was that the five Taliban generals were back on the battlefield afther the Bergdahl trade. Politifact said it was "pants on fire" because there was absolutely no truth to it. Except we are now faced with the proof that one of them has returned to the battlefield. No mea culpa from Politifact for being wrong. Like a I said, a left wing web site bought and paid for by the Tampa Bay paper.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post
The truth is important. These percentages are of statements that are undeniable quotes made by each of the listed candidates. All statements available at the posted link.

Clinton 28% mostly false or worse Trump 66% mostly false or worse Rubio 41% mostly false or worse Jeb Bush By far the most honest of the republican candidate 31% mostly false or worse Sanders 29% mostly false or worse Cruz 69% mostly false or worse
I don't see Obama's name on this list, maybe you can help chicken dick the retarded chimp out and provide a link.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 08:30 PM   #54
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You're the jackass that stupidly jumped into orbit to WK for Politifact, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. So, since you stupidly chose to be the WK for Politifact, it IS your responsibility to demonstrate that Politifact isn't biased, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. So, cough up a link that doesn't have hairy balls attached, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, and show that Politifact gave an unbiased appraisal of Odumbo's lie, 'If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor'.
Wrong again chicken dick the retarded chimp, I only pointed out to a idiot that he isn't running. Where is the link to support your claim ? You are a obsessed with hairy balls as your gay rey.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 08:31 PM   #55
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rey Lengua View Post
If it did have hairy balls attached to it , you can bet EKIM would beat the speed of light getting to it and trying to put a " lip lock " on it !!!
+1


Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
I don't see Obama's name on this list, maybe you can help chicken dick the retarded chimp out and provide a link.
Oh, but Politifact Politifact there, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Politifact is the site cited to abuse the credibility of the Republicans, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. That you continue to illustrate your stupidity by "not seeing" is your problem and yours alone, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.



Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
Wrong again chicken dick the retarded chimp, I only pointed out to a idiot that he isn't running. Where is the link to support your claim ? You are a obsessed with hairy balls as your gay rey.
Your pathetic attempt at deflection has been noted and refuted, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Your willful attempt to stupidly ignore that Politifact is the source cited -- and that is very evident -- Ekim the Inbred Chimp, only underscores your stupidity.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 12-28-2015, 03:59 AM   #56
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
I don't see Obama's name on this list, maybe you can help chicken dick the retarded chimp out and provide a link.
Ask and ye shall receive.
Obama has said mostly false, false, or pants on fire statements 26% of the time.

Barack ObamaActually reading some the politifact conclusions reveals the following statement.
(Spoiler alert: Politifact calls this a "Pants on Fire" statement which is self-explanatory. This should crush any throat shredding screams of bias on the very statement held up as an example of bias.
Instead of acknowledging their bitch-slap I would be willing to bet they will demand another one. And another. Etc.
Placing someone on ignore only stops their posts. It still shows those posts quoted by others, Which is better although not perfect. Good thing though. I would have missed his cry for help.)

Barack Obama
"What we said was, you can keep (your plan) if it hasn’t changed since the law passed."
"What we said was, you can keep (your plan) if it hasn’t changed since the law passed."
Barack Obama on Monday, November 4th, 2013 in a speech to Organizing for Action
Barack Obama says that what he'd said was you could keep your plan 'if it hasn’t changed since the law passed'

President Barack Obama’s attempt at explanation has only fanned the flames of controversy over his campaign line, "If you like your health care, you can keep it."
Obama was already dealing with a troubled rollout of the healthcare.gov website when reports of health insurance cancellation notices for many Americans started arriving.
Such notices have been common only for people purchasing insurance on the individual market, which accounts for about 5 percent of Americans, a small minority. But the existence of people in that situation struck many critics as contradicting his like-it, keep-it promise on its face.
Obama’s speech on Nov. 4, 2013, at a meeting of Organizing for Action, his campaign organization, seemed to offer a new, and confusing, wrinkle.
"Now, if you have or had one of these plans before the Affordable Care Act came into law and you really liked that plan, what we said was you can keep it if it hasn’t changed since the law passed," Obama said.
The way we read that comment -- and, judging by the contentious White House press briefing the following day, the way other Washington journalists read it -- was that Obama was saying that people had been misreporting the pledge he had made.
It wasn’t that he said "if you like your plan, you can keep it" -- it was "if your plan hasn’t changed since the law passed," you can keep it.
We wondered whether there was any evidence that Obama had used this particular caveat in the past.
Some background on "grandfathering"
First, a brief reminder of why some Americans are getting cancellation notices.
Under the new law, policies must cover a comprehensive set of benefits, including emergency care, maternity care, mental health or prescription drugs. If they don’t, they can be "grandfathered" in, but only if the plans have not been changed at all.
To be grandfathered, the plans must have operated continuously since before the law’s enactment in 2010 and have made no significant changes. This means the insurer can keep the insurance plan essentially as is, without having to implement many (though not all) of the new law’s requirements.
But the regulations defining what constitutes a significant change are tight -- and if it’s breached, the plan is on the road to oblivion. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, known as HIPAA, says that if an insurer wants to end a policy, it needs to give policy holders 90 days notice, as well as information about alternative coverage plans that insurer is offering.
That’s essentially the message that many individual-market policyholders are receiving in the mail.
We should note that Obama’s comments often were aimed at the general public. And most people do get to keep their health plans under his law, especially those who get insurance through work or Medicare. His plan specifically left the existing health care system in place while reducing the ranks of the uninsured.
Here at PolitiFact, we noticed last year that Obama’s comments were too sweeping and that it was unlikely that all Americans would be able to keep their insurance through thick and thin.
Obama’s comments before the law passed
We decided to look back from all the public statements we could find about people being allowed to keep their plans. We found at least 37 times where Obama made a variation of the pledge that if you like your plan, you can keep it. (See all 37 mentions.)
Obama used the phrase 26 times between his inauguration and when the law passed. Here are four representative samples.
Town hall in Green Bay, Wis., June 11, 2009: "No matter how we reform health care, I intend to keep this promise: If you like your doctor, you'll be able to keep your doctor; if you like your health care plan, you'll be able to keep your health care plan."
Remarks at the American Medical Association, June 15, 2009: "I know that there are millions of Americans who are content with their health care coverage -- they like their plan and, most importantly, they value their relationship with their doctor. They trust you. And that means that no matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise to the American people: If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you'll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what."
Presidential weekly address, July 18, 2009: "Michelle and I don’t want anyone telling us who our family’s doctor should be – and no one should decide that for you either. Under our proposals, if you like your doctor, you keep your doctor. If you like your current insurance, you keep that insurance. Period, end of story."
Remarks in Fairfax, Va., March 19, 2010: "If you like your doctor, you’re going to be able to keep your doctor. If you like your plan, keep your plan. I don’t believe we should give government or the insurance companies more control over health care in America. I think it’s time to give you, the American people, more control over your health."
Obama’s comments after the law was signed
We found 10 instances after the law was signed when Obama made the pledge again.
In remarks in Portland, Maine, on April 1, 2010, Obama said that "if Americans like their doctor, they will keep their doctor. And if you like your insurance plan, you will keep it. No one will be able to take that away from you. It hasn’t happened yet. It won’t happen in the future."
After the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued regulations for the law on June 14, 2010, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius blogged: "The bottom line is that under the Affordable Care Act, if you like your doctor and plan, you can keep them."
Obama then repeated the remarks during several campaign events in 2012, as well as at the first presidential debate in Denver on Oct. 3, 2012: "If you've got health insurance, it doesn't mean a government takeover. You keep your own insurance. You keep your own doctor. But it does say insurance companies can't jerk you around."
Finally, as recently as a few weeks ago, Obama was playing down the impact.
"Now, let’s start with the fact that even before the Affordable Care Act fully takes effect, about 85 percent of Americans already have health insurance -– either through their job, or through Medicare, or through the individual market," he said in a speech in Largo, Md., on Sept. 26. "So if you’re one of these folks, it’s reasonable that you might worry whether health care reform is going to create changes that are a problem for you -- especially when you’re bombarded with all sorts of fear-mongering. So the first thing you need to know is this: If you already have health care, you don’t have to do anything."
Overall, we didn’t find one instance in which Obama offered a caveat that it only applies to plans that hadn’t changed after the law’s passage.
What the White House says
The day after Obama claimed that he’d said "you can keep it if it hasn’t changed since the law passed," reporters grilled White House Press Secretary Jay Carney.
Carney claimed Obama was referring to the rules that Sebelius issued in June 2010.
"When the rule was issued, Secretary Sebelius and others spoke to the press about it … if insurance companies changed their plans or canceled their plans, they would give up the opportunity to grandfather those plans in June of 2010. There was a fair amount of coverage of that in major newspapers."
The White House pointed us to a June 14, 2010, telephone news conference with Sebelius on the rules.
"If you have a plan that you like, you keep it, but if indeed insurers or employers decide to make dramatic shifts, to the detriment of employees, huge cost shifts, huge increases in deductibles, slashing benefits, whatever, they then no longer qualify for the grandfather status, because that's really a change in the plan, and that isn't a plan that most people like very much," she said.
The White House also offered several news articles published at the time that reported Sebelius’ comments.
Of these, the one that offered the most critical assessment of the grandfather provisions, in the Washington Post, got most of its ammunition from Republicans, quoting Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., saying on the Senate floor, "This is not only bad news for the vast majority of Americans who like the plans they have. It also flatly contradicts the president's repeated promises."
By contrast, what Sebelius told the Post focused on the positive rather than the negative aspects of the change. She said Obama "wanted to make sure as much as possible that if people had plans that they liked they got to keep them and balance that with, you know, some overall protection for consumers," the Post reported.
Finally, the White House provided a series of other comments in which the administration offered a more nuanced formulation of the like-it, keep-it policy, but they were all in the past month, during the time when such criticism was already emerging.
Our ruling
According to Obama, "What we said was you can keep (your plan) if it hasn’t changed since the law passed."
But we found at least 37 times since Obama’s inauguration where he or a top administration official made a variation of the pledge that if you like your plan, you can keep it, and we never found an instance in which he offered the caveat that it only applies to plans that hadn’t changed after the law’s passage. And seven of those 37 cases came after the release of the HHS regulations that defined the "grandfathering" process, when the impact would be clear.
While Sebelius’ teleconference with reporters did provide that sort of caveat, in other instances, such as her blog post, she focused on the upside, not the downside. Her one mention of the extent to which grandfathered plans might be doomed strikes us as the equivalent of the fine print on a television commercial running in heavy rotation. Obama is ignoring the overwhelming majority of times he addressed the issue, where most people would have heard it. We rate his claim Pants on Fire.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...ou-could-keep/
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Old 12-28-2015, 04:49 AM   #57
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
If you had bothered to look, Politifact is rating politicians (including Obama), personalities, and media people.

Take terrorism, 240 possible comments and only about six belong to Hillary because (like I said) she isn't making comments or taking questions.

Of course Politifact is not above being wrong. One statement was that the five Taliban generals were back on the battlefield afther the Bergdahl trade. Politifact said it was "pants on fire" because there was absolutely no truth to it. Except we are now faced with the proof that one of them has returned to the battlefield. No mea culpa from Politifact for being wrong. Like a I said, a left wing web site bought and paid for by the Tampa Bay paper.
Below is a smattering. I tried to get all Clinton, Trump, and Cruz. Not going to list 240. Right off the bat you'll notice the chairman of Homeland Security has only 4 statements. And again no link to your claim of proof. Gong to assume you're full of shit.

Clinton 1 mt 2 f 1 t 1 ht
Trump 4 f 2 mf 2 pof 1 ht
R. Paul 1 t 1 mt
Rubio 1 ht 1 mt
Cruz 3 f 1 t 1 mt 1 mf
J Bush 2 mt
M. McCaul 2 mt 2 t
Cheney 2 f 2 mf 1 t 1 ht 1 pof
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Old 12-28-2015, 09:06 AM   #58
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

You know liberal can trust CNN..

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/29/politi...3A+Politics%29

And for EVA, I never said that Obama was on THAT list but he is on other lists. You need to check the link and go deeper (that's what she said).
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 12-28-2015, 09:11 AM   #59
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post


Barack Obama says that what he'd said was you could keep your plan 'if it hasn’t changed since the law passed'
You just bitch slapped your own stupid ass, masterdickmuncher, as you just demonstrated that Politifact -- with selective bias -- didn't do a separate analysis on Odumbo's claim that people could keep their doctors if they liked their doctors, jackass. Keeping one's doctor and keeping one's plan are clearly two separate issues, but Politifact obviously didn't want to call Odumbo a liar twice when they could mendaciously contrive to do it only once, masterdickmuncher.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 12-28-2015, 08:04 PM   #60
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

That site says that they don't rate "opinion". So when Hillary says that Assad is a reformer and we can work with him....that is an opinion and not the lie spoken by an expert in the field who should know better.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved