Putin schools Obama again

[DSK]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

If we didn't have whinny pussy democrats pissing over our shoulders all the time we might be able to actually win a war without their cowardly cut and running everytime the going get tough. But I guess we're stuck with you big pussies.

The Russkies are a third rate power and we could go through them like crap through a goose. You Dems are scared too death of them. Get some fucking back bone and call their bluff. We could kick their asses and they know it. We should never back down to those commie bastards or let them get the upper hand. Some one needs to slap some sense into BO. Put some fucking air to air missles on our jets and blow a few of theirs out of the sky. Let's see who backs off then. Jesus Christ you Dems are cowards!!!!!

You want to start a disastrous World War with a madman and a country with significant military capability and a history of fighting to the death while living through a harsh winter of total depravation? We are too soft, we are a declining power, and we should just stop the macho bullshit and leave the world alone. We cannot control it, nor should we bankrupt ourselves and kill other people on the way down into the abyss.

[RALPHEY BOY]

Originally Posted by WTF

Why don't you tell the whole truth....they thought Reagan crazy enough to start a nuclear war. Wow...we need more Presidents like that, maybe we can find one that really will start one and then you and TDL can go J/O together.



Jack Barsky: There's three things I tell people that the Russians were afraid of. AIDS, Jewish people and Ronald Reagan. And they were deathly...
Steve Kroft: In that order?
Jack Barsky: I think Ronald Reagan took the top spot. They thought he would push the button.

regardless of what we think, it worked extremely well! Why else would they have been afraid of Reagan? they sure as hell are not afraid of Obama.

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by bigtex

Autism Reacharound Crew Unite! Don't go welshing on the Vaseline!

Bigkotex is trying call you WTF.

Originally Posted by WTF

He fucked up in Libya. Should have left the Dictator in power.

He fucked up in Egypt but quickly backed the new Dictator.

.....

Syria is about Obama's bungling and failure in the USA's projection of power. It started with his "Apology Tour" at the beginning of his Presidency and continues with the reintroduction of the Taliban in Afghanistan this week. I really don't care if 250K Muslims die on the other side of the world. Just don't tell me Obama fooled the Russians and this is a policy success. You are just fooling yourself, you moronic buffoon.

[gary5912]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Who told you he hobbies with "women"? The only "women" he "gets" are the ones who can slip their clit through the glory hole down at the truck stop.

you got me on that one

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by DSK

Why kill off white people? .

Are the Kurds white?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Bigkotex is trying call you WTF.





Syria is about Obama's bungling and failure in the USA's projection of power. It started with his "Apology Tour" at the beginning of his Presidency and continues with the reintroduction of the Taliban in Afghanistan this week. I really don't care if 250K Muslims die on the other side of the world. Just don't tell me Obama fooled the Russians and this is a policy success. You are just fooling yourself, you moronic buffoon.

I did not say he fooled the Russians. .. i said it was a smart move to let them do the heavy lifting.

It is obvious this admin has made a decision to abandon the idiotic Bush policy of Democracy in the ME. That is obvious with just looking at Egypt. Took Obama to damn long to realize the Bush Doctrine in the ME was a pipe dream.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Are the Kurds white?

I'm referring to the Russians - we need not fight them. As for the others, it appears to be a futile effort, very expensive, and drains our resources. Sure, we could kill them all if we wanted to go big time, but I don't want that on my conscience.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by DSK

I'm referring to the Russians - we need not fight them. As for the others, it appears to be a futile effort, very expensive, and drains our resources. Sure, we could kill them all if we wanted to go big time, but I don't want that on my conscience.

JLIdiot, thanks for nothing!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by DSK

I'm referring to the Russians - we need not fight them. As for the others, it appears to be a futile effort, very expensive, and drains our resources. Sure, we could kill them all if we wanted to go big time, but I don't want that on my conscience.

When was the last time "we" fought the Russians?

While BigTits is stalking around you might ask him what the outcome would be ...

... after all ... he's got 20-20 hindsight xray vision ... and can see for 1000's of miles.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by gary5912

well dipshit let me lay this out so you will understand,most of the women I see, I contact thru P411 much better class of women than the ones you fined on Backpage, because usually the ones on backpage carry baggage I don't like to be around so go head have your fun and you should always practice safe sex so your wife is not a victim of your stupidity

Wife That's a good one. I'm not stupid enough to get chained down, you idiot. And then they want to take half your money. No thanks.

Just be glad your dick still gets up at your age. I'll worry about myself, thanks.

[RedLeg505]

Originally Posted by DSK

You want to start a disastrous World War with a madman and a country with significant military capability and a history of fighting to the death while living through a harsh winter of total depravation? We are too soft, we are a declining power, and we should just stop the macho bullshit and leave the world alone. We cannot control it, nor should we bankrupt ourselves and kill other people on the way down into the abyss.

A "significant military capability"??? ROFL>. they took 10 YEARS to fight to a draw, against a country we defeated in 100 hours of ground combat. Yeah.. real "significant"

But its good that you and Obama think they are dangerous. Obama, being the BULLY he is, would have already bombed them if he thought they were "weak and defenseless" like the SEVEN other countries Obama's already bombed, right?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by DSK

I'm referring to the Russians - we need not fight them. As for the others, it appears to be a futile effort, very expensive, and drains our resources..

I'm not suggesting you do or you are ... but if one cuts through the bullshit and media hype (to spin their points) ... "the fall of Iraq" did not take long relatively speaking and (although I regret the loss of one life) DID NOT COSTS the "4,000" lives touted as being the death toll for "the war"! I think the death count was in the 200-300 range, if I recall correctly. The "heavy costs" were the continued occupation and gradual withdrawal while trying to make them a model democracy next door to Israel.

It should be a concern to all, left .... center ... right, that this country is "timid," if not fearful, of taking on 30,000 to 50,000 hoodlums who hide their faces and rape and torture women and children. Or is it just our President who is afraid.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by RedLeg505

A "significant military capability"??? ROFL>. they took 10 YEARS to fight to a draw, against a country we defeated in 100 hours of ground combat. Yeah.. real "significant"

But its good that you and Obama think they are dangerous. Obama, being the BULLY he is, would have already bombed them if he thought they were "weak and defenseless" like the SEVEN other countries Obama's already bombed, right?

Easy to say when you won't be fighting them and neither will any of your children. It's the poor man's son that always fights the rich man's war. Coward.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I'm not suggesting you do or you are ... but if one cuts through the bullshit and media hype (to spin their points) ... "the fall of Iraq" did not take long relatively speaking and (although I regret the loss of one life) DID NOT COSTS the "4,000" lives touted as being the death toll for "the war"! I think the death count was in the 200-300 range, if I recall correctly. The "heavy costs" were the continued occupation and gradual withdrawal while trying to make them a model democracy next door to Israel.

It should be a concern to all, left .... center ... right, that this country is "timid," if not fearful, of taking on 30,000 to 50,000 hoodlums who hide their faces and rape and torture women and children. Or is it just our President who is afraid.

I'm not afraid to fight, but I don't want to die in vain. I don't want our boys (and a few girls) to do so either. That withdrawal part is part of the futile effort I was speaking of concerning the impossible logistics. Those fuckers live in a desert - why do they care if they live or die? Especially when dying gets you into heaven with all those virgin girls!!

With all the oil we now have access to, we need nothing they have - so let Russia bother with it and let's get out.

We cannot straighten them out and it just costs us to try. It is a sunk cost - abandon it.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

When was the last time "we" fought the Russians?

While BigTits is stalking around you might ask him what the outcome would be ...

... after all ... he's got 20-20 hindsight xray vision ... and can see for 1000's of miles.

I have the presumptuous sodomite bigtits on ignore.