Hero of the left says free speech is illegal

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by liberaldevil

I love this forum! Its right good for a laugh!

Truly? Did you laugh hysterically when that anti-colonialist Odumbo forthrightly rejected and then returned Sir Jacob Epstein’s bronze bust of Prime Minister Churchill to jolly ol’ England?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...o-Britain.html

[Don't Be Daft!]

Each to his/her own I reckon. If you're trying to have a go at me mate I'm not biting. If Obama didn't want it then that's okay with me. I wouldn't have done that but that's just me.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by liberaldevil

Each to his/her own I reckon. If you're trying to have a go at me mate I'm not biting. If Obama didn't want it then that's okay with me. I wouldn't have done that but that's just me.

You may not have done so, but he pointedly did.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...o-Britain.html

[timpage]

You may think Britain's colonialism and oppression of third world countries, which Churchill was a major proponent and supporter of, was a fine thing. Others, not so much. Great Britain exploited its colonies in Africa, India and around the world, enriching itself at the expense of the inhabitants of those dominions.

Churchill had his good points and his bad. As the article points out, Obama's grandfather was apparently tortured by British authorities in Kenya during some sort of uprising. Not particularly surprising that Obama wouldn't have warm and fuzzy feelings towards Churchill. I doubt you would either under those circumstances.

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by timpage

You may think Britain's colonialism and oppression of third world countries, which Churchill was a major proponent and supporter of, was a fine thing. Others, not so much. Great Britain exploited its colonies in Africa, India and around the world, enriching itself at the expense of the inhabitants of those dominions.

Churchill had his good points and his bad. As the article points out, Obama's grandfather was apparently tortured by British authorities in Kenya during some sort of uprising. Not particularly surprising that Obama wouldn't have warm and fuzzy feelings towards Churchill. I doubt you would either under those circumstances.

Obama's grandfather was tortured by British soldiers because of his participation in the Mau Mau rebellion in the 1950's in Kenya. As a result of his father's misstreatment by the British, Obama's father hated Great Britain.

Barack Obama named his autobiography Dreams From My Father. The point is that Barack Obama has adopted his father's hatred for white Europeans. That's why the title of his book is dreams from my father not dreams of my father. His father's dreams have become his dreams.

We can debate whether or not Obama's hatred for Great Britain is warranted, but there is no doubt that having an enemy of Great Britain, which is arguably our most reliable ally in the world, for president is not in America's best interest.

[timpage]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

Obama's grandfather was tortured by British soldiers because of his participation in the Mau Mau rebellion in the 1950's in Kenya. As a result of his father's misstreatment by the British, Obama's father hated Great Britain.

Barack Obama named his autobiography Dreams From My Father. The point is that Barack Obama has adopted his father's hatred for white Europeans. That's why the title of his book is dreams from my father not dreams of my father. His father's dreams have become his dreams.

We can debate whether or not Obama's hatred for Great Britain is warranted, but there is no doubt that having an enemy of Great Britain, which is arguably our most reliable ally in the world, for president is not in America's best interest.

How do you get from Obama not being happy that his grandpa was tortured by British authorities to Obama hates all white people and Great Britain? How do you get to Great Britain being an enemy of the US? Because Obama sent back a bust of Churchill? What's the analysis here precisely that you went through to arrive at those brilliant conclusions?

Forgive me for not having any scientific research, but I'd be willing to bet that the people and government of Great Britain like, and have more respect for President Obama than his wheels-off predecessor who, according to you, must have polished Churchill's bronze head in the oval office every night.

Sometimes you post things that make some sense and then you veer out of your lane and out into the weeds with this kind of crazy, mouth-foaming shit. Odd.

[Grifter]

No chance that Obama and the current chap are more chummy that Tony Blair and Bush.....no chance.

[Don't Be Daft!]

Our, "chap" isn't my choice. But, Tories never are. Hopefully, will get Labour back in soon!

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by Grifter

No chance that Obama and the current chap are more chummy that Tony Blair and Bush.....no chance.

Tony was a shitdipper, and our decider cheerleader has a corporate asshole ... perfect match

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by timpage

How do you get from Obama not being happy that his grandpa was tortured by British authorities to Obama hates all white people and Great Britain? How do you get to Great Britain being an enemy of the US? Because Obama sent back a bust of Churchill? What's the analysis here precisely that you went through to arrive at those brilliant conclusions?

Forgive me for not having any scientific research, but I'd be willing to bet that the people and government of Great Britain like, and have more respect for President Obama than his wheels-off predecessor who, according to you, must have polished Churchill's bronze head in the oval office every night.

Sometimes you post things that make some sense and then you veer out of your lane and out into the weeds with this kind of crazy, mouth-foaming shit. Odd.

Dinesh D'Souza (a scholar at The American Enterprise Institute and the Hoover Institution at Stanford University) has written an excellent book called The Roots of Obama's Rage. I don't believe he is crazy or foaming at the mouth. The premise of his book is more or less what I stated, probably imperfectly, in my post.

You should have read my post more carefully. I didn't say that Great Britain was our enemy; I said that Obama is an enemy of Great Britain. As far as why I believe that Obama hates white people, here is a quote from James Cone. Cone is more or less the inventor of Obama's so called religion which is called black liberation theology. It shows that Cone is completely filled with hatred towards white people; one might even say crazy foaming at the mouth. Keep in mind that Obama listened to this sort of hatefull bile for twenty years and brought his children up in it.

Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love

http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/200...ne-of-silence/


From
The Roots of Obama’s Rage

We are today living out the script for America and the world that was dreamt up not by Obama but by Obama’s father. How do I know this? Because Obama says so himself. Reflect for a moment on the title of his book: it’s not Dreams of My Father but rather Dreams from My Father. In other words, Obama is not writing a book about his father’s dreams; he is writing a book about the dreams that he got from his father.

Think about what this means. The most powerful country in the world is being governed according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s—a polygamist who abandoned his wives, drank himself into stupors, and bounced around on two iron legs (after his real legs had to be amputated because of a car crash caused by his drunk driving). This philandering, inebriated African socialist, who raged against the world for denying him the realization of his anti-colonial ambitions, is now setting the nation’s agenda through the reincarnation of his dreams in his son. The son is the one who is making it happen, but the son is, as he candidly admits, only living out his father’s dream. The invisible father provides the inspiration, and the son dutifully gets the job done. America today is being governed by a ghost.

Dinesh D’Souza is the president of The King’s College in New York City. He is a former White House domestic policy analyst and research scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. His bestselling books include Illiberal Education, The End of Racism, and What’s So Great About America. Websites: dineshdsouza.com, tkc.edu.

[CJ7]

[quote=liberaldevil;2287171]Each to his/her own I reckon. If you're trying to have a go at me mate I'm not biting.


now youre catching on

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

now youre catching on

CBJ7, you are hilarious. Your ass has been landed, gutted and filleted!!!

[Grifter]

Originally Posted by CJ7

Tony was a shitdipper, and our decider cheerleader has a corporate asshole ... perfect match

Read it 3 times still dont know what youre saying here.

[CuteOldGuy]

Actually, it's pretty accurate. They were a perfect match for the reasons stated.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by Grifter

Read it 3 times still dont know what youre saying here.

No chance that Obama and the current chap are more chummy that Tony Blair and Bush.....no chance

Blair buttfucker Bush butfuckee aka corporate whore