The Different Types of Guys on Eccie

[dtymh55]

Good one, Mr GlobeSpotter.

[golfdude]

Well a thread likes this really makes me want to go see the girl who started it. What kind of person starts this thread?

[TheAntichrist666]

I guess I fall in the Professional category...

[Guest100613]

Originally Posted by TheAntichrist666

I guess I fall in the Professional category...

There HAS to be a special category set up for you. Cosplay kind of requires it.

[landon]

Since when is 150-200 bargain shopping? Many on BP offer pussy at 80 and I have had many off SA (Seeking Arrangement) for 60-100 and these attractive amateur gals. Strippers at the club where I am VIP have offered to me at 100-200 upon seeing an offer of 300 was not going anywhere. Certainly if it were legal the POP would come down quite a bit. The three I have on roster right now range from 100-140 and I have had them (20-20-almost 300 sessions). Seeing a gal on a regular basis should drive down POP.

I just don't see 150-200 as cheap A. There may be people willing to pay the BMW / Cadillac providers 300+ and I have done that in certain circumstances (like LA or Vegas). As a successful professional I may shop around but in the final analysis it is how the gal can give me pussy...and satisfy me plus give good pop.

When I c one with a really high price I wonder - Is she really that good of a fuck, does she have a nice pleasure box, does she give good GFE....are people simply fucking her for fame and paying that (porn star)....?

With all the providers in Houston be they escorts, strippers, sugar dating gals (SA), I would consider $200 a strong price to pay for pussy in Houston if even that much. While I shop around, there is nothing like a good keeper girl who will give me good performance, reasonable pop and quantity, frequency discounts.....

[blowpop]

Originally Posted by Jusanotherdude

You have to laugh? *Why is that? *At the semantics of what is/isn't VIP/HDH? *

I always chuckle when anyone selling something tries to position all the competitors who charge less than they do as somehow inferior, as if their price point is the magical one, where all above represent a great product or service, and all below are for "bargain hunters".

I've been hobbying for a long time. I've found very little correlation between higher rates and better sessions. I have found that higher rates usually indicate a better website, better photography, and a nicer incall. But there are fantastic, beautiful providers at almost every price point.

(Not surprisingly, many of the HDH-type providers started out at more modest price points, but raised their rates as they developed a list of regulars who provide the steady cashflow they need.)

Originally Posted by Jusanotherdude

She stated, quite clearly, that many "claim to be" or which*encompasses "an array of escorts"... seems as though she kept it fairly vague and went out of her way to remain benign on the subject..... To me she is the one who should be offended at your comments trying to put words into her mouth. I don't see anywhere where she claims to be "devoted" to the notion of "higher rate=higher quality". **Seems to me someone else's agenda is coming to the forefront here.....

I think everyone is entitled to be offended whenever they wish. But I think our society would be a better one if people weren't so easily offended. We each have our own opinions.

Originally Posted by Jusanotherdude

I found the list funny,*satirical, and a bit of tongue in cheek..... *as far as the "bargain*shopper"*comment, I would say it is all a matter of perspective there.....*

But I will tell you this..... I defy you to find a woman who looks as absolutely drop dead as this one, with a body Brooke Burke would admire, and who fucks as well as any porn starlet that is under the $300 mark..... in some cases (not all!) the higher price does in fact yield a MUCH higher quality...... This girl is without question one of those cases..... she is only low profile because she chooses to be.....*

Offhand, I can think of three UTR providers that I've seen in the past year that fit into this category. They're not known to the Eccie community, and to be fair, I don't know how well they fuck, but I fully enjoyed my time with them. (And no, I have no plans to introduce them to Eccie. Been there, done that, and I was not happy with the outcome.)

[blowpop]

Originally Posted by WTF

You don't like your list questioned but you have no problem questioning anothers opinions?

I don't mind anyone sharing their opinions about my list. Heck, I've encouraged others to put together their own lists, so we can have more opinions. I assume that if you start a thread in a discussion forum, you are inviting discussion, much of which will disagree with you.

[blowpop]

Originally Posted by tracer

I remember a day when his lists were questioned, but they were legitimate questions rather than just accusations based on assumptions. I don't ever recall him getting pissy over someone saying..."no way does she belong on the list, I have had much better" or "I agree with #3, but would have put her more like #8". More to the point, I don't recall him saying he objects to any questioning of his list. Defending it doesn't mean you object to the question.

That said, I don't really care about his list at all, but always look at it anyway. This list was entertaining, but as many have stated, very over simplified.

Thanks, Tracer. I like discussions about who's does and doesn't belong on my list, particularly learning about talented women who I've yet to meet. For some my list doesn't have much value. Others find it useful. Others seem to be somehow threatened by it. Go figure.

What we had this time wasn't discussion about the women on the list per se - I don't think anyone felt that there were women on the list who weren't talented. The issue called into question was my ethics. I responded openly to the allegations, but I applaud the decision to close the thread. At some point "yes you are" "no I'm not" becomes played out.

(I was amused that those who were most loudly and repeatedly questioning my ethics were the ones who have demonstrated themselves to be rather ethically challenged, and repeatedly post self-aggrandizing comments as a way to get attention.)

[Guest082824]

Let's ALL try to stay on the topic of "The Different Types of Guys on Eccie"...if anyone would like to talk more about "Lists", please start another thread

[pyramider]

DeD, the different types of is a list, its just not numbered.

[Guest082824]

Originally Posted by pyramider

DeD, the different types of is a list, its just not numbered.

You know what 3-Sides, you're right....I'm a dumb ass

[ICU 812]

Friendly-Dreamer (no-money) and semiPro anna be.

Waiting for the Clearing House van—they ought to park out front any day now.

[pyramider]

Originally Posted by DickEmDown

You know what 3-Sides, you're right....I'm a dumb ass

That has gotta hurt, the tainted one is correct. Out of 18K posts I was bound to be correct once.

[BatteriesNotIncluded]

How about "stripper hunter"? 3 chicks in VIP plus champagne, drinks and party accessories for the 1200 mentioned?? And that's in an upscale club.

[Texas36]

LOL finally some truth on the board. The vindictive/bargain shoppers are the worst!! They actually have the nerve to say."I am a reviewer on ECCIE (or some other board) and if you don't do this or this the way I like. I will give you a bad review." Maybe that should be a new category.....The Blackmailer......