Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70796
biomed163334
Yssup Rider61040
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48679
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42781
CryptKicker37223
The_Waco_Kid37138
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-13-2011, 08:03 AM   #46
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexTushHog View Post
As I recall, they are having trouble enough recruiting to meet their personnel needs at full salary.

I guess I have to be literal with some people.
Eliminating "dead wood" in an organization doesn't "substantially" reduce the budget, but it offers an opportunity to have people who are there for the over all health of the organization in place to make positive and contributing decisions that does improve the long term condition and health of the organization. Having people who have created wealth and been successful in leading businesses to financial security in our government, as opposed to those who have sucked on the government tit for most of their lives, would improve our financial situation.

That is the fallacy of the current administration's attack on the "wealthiest of Americans" .... who is going to create and increase jobs in this country?

The person with a "Lone Star" card or the person with an American Express?

This guy is passing out taxpayers' money to the unions, left and right, and the unions are the primary reason for the outsourcing of jobs, along with the likes of John Kerry-Catsup.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 08:31 AM   #47
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
This guy is passing out taxpayers' money to the unions,
I find the above statement to be quite curious. Yes, the so called "unions" worked very hard in 2008 to help Obama. However, I have read recent articles in which the "unions" have become increasingly critical of the Administration's policies. Please cite specific examples about how Obama is "passing out taxpayers' money to the unions." Has he awarded the "unions" with GW style corporate tax incentives? If so, please cite your sources!
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 09:45 AM   #48
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex View Post
I find the above statement to be quite curious.

However, I have read recent articles in which the "unions" have become increasingly critical of the Administration's policies.
What "policies" have the unions criticized? And don't cite articles ...

... cite the union bosses!

When Federal funding regulations require union labor contracts and the largest Federal assistance ("stimulous") grants go to "union-states", then it is ...

"passing out taxpayers' money to the unions" ....

.... because the unions get the contracts to do the "stimulous" work.

In the current proposed legislation ... Federal employees, teachers, and "infrastructure" funds.

It's like reading headlines in the op-ed pages on "Obama Care" ...

.. the devil is in the details .... not in the headlines.

Do you actually believe it is coincidental that Obbie gives a speech to the unions and then the next day or 2 announces his latest ... "Jobs Bill" proposal?
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 10:21 AM   #49
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
And don't cite articles ...

... cite the union bosses!
Damn, you are a demanding ol' cus, aren't you? It seems as though you are now trying to tell me who I can and can't cite as sources. After all of these years, do you really believe I am going to start listening to you now? Why would I? Need I remind you that from the very beginning, you clearly steered me wrong on the WMD issue! And that is just one of countless examples!!!!!

Before I go any further, what exactly is a "union boss?" I looked on the AFL-CIO website and found no job title, job description or mention of anyone with a title of "union boss!" Is this an official title or designation or is it just another of your so called "terms of endearment" that you have become so famous for? Something along the lines of "Obamanible!" ROTFLMAO


Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
What "policies" have the unions criticized? And don't cite articles ...

You want examples? How is this for a start? Since there is no such person (or job description) who is otherwise known as a "union boss," why don't we refer to a prepared statement by the AFL-CIO, which was found on their website? Meanwhile, I long for the day when the AFL-CIO will designate an official (or unofficial) "union boss" for me to quote.

Until then......

Statement by AFL-CIO on the Proposed Colombia Trade Agreement
April 06, 2011


We are deeply disappointed that the Obama Administration has signaled that it will move forward to submit the proposed U.S.-Colombia Trade Agreement to Congress for a vote in the near future. In our view, the situation in Colombia remains unacceptably violent for trade unionists, as well as for human rights defenders and other vulnerable populations. In addition, Colombian workers face enormous and indefensible legal and practical hurdles in exercising their rights to organize unions and bargain collectively.

We appreciate the efforts of the Obama Administration to negotiate a separate Action Plan with the Colombian government to address some of the concerns we have raised over many years with respect to human and labor rights for workers, murders of trade unionists, and impunity for the perpetrators of violence. We understand that the proposed Action Plan lays out some important benchmarks in terms of increasing the level of protection for workers, addressing some flaws in the labor code, and improving enforcement of labor laws.

However, the Action Plan does not go nearly far enough in laying out concrete benchmarks for progress in the areas of violence and impunity, nor does it address many of the ways in which Colombian labor law falls short of international standards. There is no guarantee that the terms of it will in fact lead to a reduction in violence, and no backup plan to delay implementation if the violence and impunity continue. Furthermore, the Action Plan is a stand-alone agreement, not connected to the benefits conferred in the trade agreement. Once the trade agreement is ratified by Congress and implemented, the U.S. government will have no leverage whatsoever to enforce its terms in the event that the terms are not implemented as agreed.

The Colombian government has failed in enforcing the rule of law and protecting the safety of its citizens as they exercise their internationally recognized human rights to form unions and bargain collectively. These problems are deeply ingrained and longstanding, and they cannot be solved by commitments on a piece of paper. Concrete progress on the ground with respect to violence, impunity, and labor law reform needs to be demonstrated over a sustained period of time.

Colombia remains the most deadly nation in the world in which to be a trade unionist. In the past 25 years, more than 2,850 trade unionists have been murdered in Colombia. Last year alone, 51 trade unionists were murdered, an increase over 2009. Six trade unionists have been murdered so far this year, including two in the past week. The conviction rate for union murders and other violence is in the single digits, and even where prosecutions have occurred, many perpetrators have been charged in absentia and are still on the loose. Union density in Colombia is below 5 percent, and even fewer workers can exercise their right to bargain collectively. We have no doubt that if 51 CEOs had been murdered in Colombia last year, this deal would be on a very slow track indeed.

We are consulting closely with our union counterparts in Colombia and will continue to consult with the Obama administration about the terms of the Action Plan and its implementation. But, on the basis of the information provided to us at this time, we remain strongly opposed to the Colombia trade agreement.
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 11:55 AM   #50
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex View Post
what exactly is a "union boss?"

Statement by AFL-CIO on the Proposed Colombia Trade Agreement

"We are consulting closely with our union counterparts in Colombia ..."



"union boss" [The "apple" don't fall far from the tree.]

Interesting concept for U.S. union members:


"We are consulting closely with our union counterparts in Colombia ..."

The "gift" that just keeps on giving.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 12:02 PM   #51
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

It's been 4 months since that statement, and waiting and Obama still hasn't sent the Columbia free trade agreement to Congress for ratification, because of union oppoisiton.....no day light between the union thugs and Obama.....
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 12:31 PM   #52
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
.....no day light between the union thugs and Obama.....
The word is ... "Chicago"!

Did right by John Kennedy. Will "do right" by Obaminable.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 04:52 PM   #53
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
"union boss" [The "apple" don't fall far from the tree.]

Interesting concept for U.S. union members:


"We are consulting closely with our union counterparts in Colombia ..."

The "gift" that just keeps on giving.
The guy in the picture is not a "union boss" with the AFL-CIO!

When are you going to give the "gift" back?
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 07:19 PM   #54
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex View Post
The guy in the picture is not a "union boss" with the AFL-CIO!
Good, ... you at least know what a "union boss" is ...

... affiliation is now an issue.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 09:13 PM   #55
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
Good, ... you at least know what a "union boss" is ...

... affiliation is now an issue.
Well, it stands to reason that if there is no acknowledged job description for a "union boss" than the person in the picture could not be one. DUH!
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 09-14-2011, 04:59 AM   #56
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex View Post
Well, it stands to reason that if there is no acknowledged job description for a "union boss" than the person in the picture could not be one. DUH!
Throughout my "abbreviated" experience in public service and private endeavors I have yet to see any "job description" printed in any policies of any organization that is entitled "the boss" ..... but, of course, I have not reviewed those that you have drafted for approval or those under which you have endured .....

..... although I suspect that occasionally throughout your unequaled vast employment and subordindate experiences you have referred to the individual who authorizes or signs your check, tells you when you can take a break, authorizes you to be away from work for extended periods of time to relax, and/or monitors your time while employed .... as ...... "the boss"!

Here is a photo of "the boss" ...



Pssstt ..... it's the guy in the suit.

Speaking of Solyndra and unions ....

.. do you know how many union jobs were "created" with the infusion of tax dollars into that abyss that "the boss" praised as

“the true engine of economic growth ...." (May 2010.)

$535 million in "stimulus" money to guarantee loans for the "green economy" ....

.... pardon the pun. FYI: That was after the campaign contributions.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 09-14-2011, 05:34 PM   #57
hi_handsome
Account Disabled
 
hi_handsome's Avatar
 
User ID: 92145
Join Date: Jul 20, 2011
Location: planet handsome
Posts: 27
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Reform, the tax code and the loopholes

Reform medicare, medicaid, and public assistance

Big liberal government spending creating jobs in building, regulation, and small business loans.

Education incentives for engineers and health care providers careers. Most importantly this nation needs to have the skills to complete in the global economy. For example, the skills needed to assemble the same electronic components in your TV. Where was your TV made? Most likely, Japan. These are the new manufacturing jobs. Not some "clock builders". Let China con't to make your plastic spoons and easy to assemble desk sets. We can create the items with high price tags, such as cars, and TV's and the equipement China needs to press those plastic spoons together.

Also, we need a complete overhaul of our energy system. Those power lines can be replaced by wind and solar systems. All of those nuclear power plants can be replace with the new energy system. That's a few millions jobs alone.

Reduce our military presence in most of these countries, changing our missions into help as opposed to occupation. Sudan is in need of dire support.

Lastly, regulatory reform and removing wasteful spending. For instance, those weekend warrior over there in Iraq is a waste of our tax payers dollars.
hi_handsome is offline   Quote
Old 09-14-2011, 11:00 PM   #58
cptjohnstone
Valued Poster
 
cptjohnstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 3,631
Default

I am in the meat business and I called a guy in Shamrock TX to see if he would cut some bones for me. He said he could not because everybody is the "all" business and cannot find anybody to work for him

So drill baby drill

I think I pointed that early TTH, our UE here in OK is less than 6%!!!!!!
cptjohnstone is offline   Quote
Old 09-14-2011, 11:47 PM   #59
IIFFOFRDB
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
Default

Vote in a new President who (Get's It). Plain and simple.
IIFFOFRDB is offline   Quote
Old 09-15-2011, 12:35 AM   #60
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

LOL! I'd like to see a candidate who "gets it." Gary Johnson, maybe, but no one gets to hear from him.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved