Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Is it even possible to accuse Trump of collusion without Russians
Also, on this very day, we learn that Trump in not colluding with the Russians - so far - regarding social media platforms. Might take a day or two for Adam Shift-less or Haagen-Dazs Nancy to tie the Ruskies into it somehow.
Quote:
Devin Nunes: President Trump Encouraged Elon Musk to Purchase Twitter
Devin Nunes was on with Stuart Varney and he dropped a bomb about Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter.
President Trump encouraged Elon Musk to buy Twitter. According to Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes, former President Donald Trump encouraged billionaire Elon Musk to purchase Twitter to help bring free speech emphasis back to social media.
Nunes shared:
President Trump before Elon Musk bought it, actually said to go and buy it because the goal of our company is to build a community where people are in a family-friendly safe environment – very much different than Twitter and that’s why we encouraged Elon Musk to buy it because someone has to continue to take on these tech tyrants. Donald Trump wanted to make sure the American people got their voice back.
Also, on this very day, we learn that Trump in not colluding with the Russians - so far - regarding social media platforms. Might take a day or two for Adam Shift-less or Haagen-Dazs Nancy to tie the Ruskies into it somehow.
Is that party like a Social that some people put together here?
Open buffet of Providers.
A reminder of the good ole days here in South Florida when we had a board that allowed a couple of member's to advertise their parties ( about 5 a year ) that sometimes had 200 men to 50 escorts give or take.
This party lasted for about 14 years, the best years of my life!!!
For me, it use to be as easy as ordering a pizza, be there in 30 minutes, hot and ready to eat!
Not any more! Put's a whole new meaning to "dry spell".
Signed "down and out of the game in Miami" as hard as that is to believe. No responses from half a dozen different sites. I'm wondering if there is anybody left in this hobby because I sure as hell can't find them after years of bliss.
Well folks, you don’t have to believe me, you heard it from Nunes’ mouth that Trump encouraged Elon to buy Twitter. Trump and his camp support Elon and his mission.
Just as I suspected and laid out for you all over the past few weeks, the entire timeline reeks of white hat involvement. It was calculated, methodical, strategical, well timed to maximize damage and enemy exposure, and captivated a massive global audience. Moves and countermoves were flawlessly projected and executed and the enemy not only lost control of one of their most powerful brainwashing assets, but also exposed their own corruption whilst under the world spotlight.
Notice how Trump and his team waited until AFTER Twitter was fully secure, before going public that they were involved.
Now does it make more sense why the left-wing media complex went scorched earth on Elon and declared this as the greatest threat to democracy? Why the Biden admin went full blown authoritarian dictator and created the Ministry of Truth? Because they knew Trump was involved in this move. They knew Elon was working with Trump to some extent. They knew this path leads to the end of their reign.
All the while, Trump is off screen, in the shadows. Just quietly working on TruthSocial, saying he’s not coming back to Twitter, etc. Giving off the OPTICS that he is distant from the entire situation. When in reality, he was advising it. And in all likelihood, based on the success and the Modus Operandi, it’s clear to me that Elon had significant operational help from Trump and military assets.
Now, why did Elon and Trump ensure that Trump seemed distant from the operation? TO TARGET THE NORMIES.
If Trump would have been linked to this deal before it was finalized, the centrists and leftists would have immediately discredited it and be less likely to pay attention. Because they are, quite literally, programmed to despise anything associated with Trump. By Trump appearing uninvolved, the story was followed by centrists and leftists as well, and allowed for this operation to result in a broader range of normies waking up to the reality of censorship online and the war on truth.
Conservatives are already all too aware of this reality, so there was no need to try and target that base. This was designed to penetrate centrist/left-wing echo chambers.
You’re welcome to believe all of this happened on accident and just so happened to be massively beneficial to Trump and his political campaign. I’m more inclined to believe that this was a meticulously calculated normie-waking operation, specifically designed to target centrists and leftists. Coordinated and advised by Trump and white hats.
Keep in mind Elon is the US MIL’s highest paid contractor… and the US MIL supports Trump.
Saudi billionaire changes tune, says Elon Musk ‘excellent’ for Twitter
The Saudi prince whoinitially rejected Elon Musk’s takeover bid of Twitternow says he welcomes the move afterjoining a group of billionaire investorsin helping the Tesla boss secure funding for the $44 billion transaction.
Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud tweeted to Musk on Thursday: “Great to connect with you my ‘new’ friend.”
“I believe you will be an excellent leader for Twitter to propel and maximise its great potential.”
The Saudi royal, who is one of the richest men in the desert kingdom, said he and his company, Kingdom Holding Company, were “looking forward to roll [over] our ~$1.9bn [stake] in the “new” Twitter and join you on this exciting journey.”
Last month, just days after Musk announced his offer to buy out Twitter shareholders for $54.20 per share, the prince tweeted: “I don’t believe that the proposed offer by elonmusk ($54.20) comes close to the intrinsic value of Twitter given its growth prospects.”
“Being one of the largest & long-term shareholders of Twitter, Kingdom_KHC & I reject this offer.”
Jack Dorsey and Elon MuskMARCO BELLO/AFP/Picture Alliance/Getty Images
Twitter cofounder and former CEO Jack Dorsey "whispered" in Elon Musk's ear that the social-media platform ought to be a private company, and other billionaire contacts pushed Musk to pursue the takeover deal he ultimately made, the Wall Street Journal reported Friday.
Dorsey, who stepped down as Twitter CEO in November, has publicly and heartily supported Musk's purchase, saying that he is a "singular solution" to leading Twitter.
Peter Thiel and David Sacks are apparently two of the people who encouraged Musk, the Journal said. Like Musk, Thiel and Sacks are former PayPal mavens who are often referred to as the "PayPal Mafia" because of the influence many have amassed in tech after helping to create the payments company.
Musk's relationship with Dorsey was evident over a period of time, the WSJ reported.
Their online friendliness and general bromance began in 2016 and progressed from there, Insider has reported.
According to unnamed former Twitter executives who spoke to the Journal, Musk and Dorsey apparently both felt that Twitter would function better as a privately owned enterprise and that it should be thought of less as a profit machine and more like a positive utility for the public.
Musk and his associates have repeatedly expressed interest in replatforming people banned from Twitter or are annoyed that people were de-platformed, per the WSJ report.
The outlet mentioned that Charles Johnson, who was banned from Twitter for raising money to "take out" a BLM activist, texted the head of Musk's personal investment office, on the Twitter purchase and asked when he could get his account back.
"Hopefully soon," the investment head, Jared Birchall, apparently responded, according to the Journal.
But as the WSJ story noted, he's none too perturbed by the controversy, and likely never has been: In 2018, in a now-public email, Musk told a PR consultant that he wasn't going to tweet less.
"Will tweet as I wish and suffer the consequences…so it goes," he wrote..
Musk, Dorsey, and Twitter did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A reminder of the good ole days here in South Florida when we had a board that allowed a couple of member's to advertise their parties ( about 5 a year ) that sometimes had 200 men to 50 escorts give or take.
This party lasted for about 14 years, the best years of my life!!!
For me, it use to be as easy as ordering a pizza, be there in 30 minutes, hot and ready to eat!
Not any more! Put's a whole new meaning to "dry spell".
Signed "down and out of the game in Miami" as hard as that is to believe. No responses from half a dozen different sites. I'm wondering if there is anybody left in this hobby because I sure as hell can't find them after years of bliss.
Maybe the Musky one will do a party like that when he finally gets the blue bird special.
Let me know of anything good in Miami. Gonna be there shortly. Only thing I see is that Nina Pink girl up the coast.
Musk's $44 billion Twitter buyout challenged in shareholder lawsuit
Jonathan Stempel
Fri, May 6, 2022, 10:42 AM
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) - Elon Musk and Twitter Inc were sued on Friday by a Florida pension fund seeking to stop Musk from completing his $44 billion takeover of the social media company before 2025.
In a proposed class action filed in Delaware Chancery Court, the Orlando Police Pension Fund said Delaware law forbade a quick merger because Musk had agreements with other big Twitter shareholders, including his financial adviser Morgan Stanley and Twitter founder Jack Dorsey, to support the buyout.
The fund said those agreements made Musk, who owns 9.6% of Twitter, the effective "owner" of more than 15% of the company's shares. It said that required delaying the merger by three years unless two-thirds of shares not "owned" by him granted approval.
given that Delaware is considered the most "business friendly" state to incorporate in i'd be surprised the law states what they claim. even if it does state such, all Musk has to do is put it up to a shareholder vote and if he gets two-thirds of "non-controlled" shares he defeats the suit.
Morgan Stanley owns about 8.8% of Twitter shares and Dorsey owns 2.4%.
Musk hopes to complete his $54.20 per share Twitter takeover this year, in one of the world's largest leveraged buyouts.
He also runs electric car company Tesla Inc, leads The Boring Co and SpaceX, and is the world's richest person according to Forbes magazine.
Twitter and its board, including Dorsey and Chief Executive Parag Agrawal, were also named as defendants.
Twitter declined to comment. Lawyers for Musk and the Florida fund did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The lawsuit also seeks to declare that Twitter directors breached their fiduciary duties, and recoup legal fees and costs. It did not make clear how shareholders believed they might be harmed if the merger closed on schedule.
On Thursday, Musk said he had raised around $7 billion, including from sovereign wealth funds and friends in Silicon Valley, to help fund a takeover.
Musk had no financing lined up when he announced plans to buy Twitter last month.
Some of the new investors appear to share interests with Musk, a self-described free speech absolutist who could change how the San Francisco-based company moderates content.
Florida's state pension fund also invests in Twitter, and Governor Ron DeSantis said this week it could make a $15 million to $20 million profit if Musk completed his buyout.
In afternoon trading, Twitter shares were down 60 cents at $49.76.
The case is Orlando Police Pension Fund v Twitter Inc et al, Delaware Chancery Court, No. 2022-0396.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Howard Goller and Mark Potter)
