Male Members who do not review

[Boltfan]

Originally Posted by davidfree986

You might want reread what I wrote in the original post

Originally Posted by davidfree986

It's not the only criteria, go reread what I wrote, not just the question asked.

Originally Posted by davidfree986

You did not get my point, perhaps reread what I posted in the OP. I am not saying guys that do not write reviews are all trolls, per se

Originally Posted by davidfree986

IMO, both are someone who spews negativity on a constant basis. While the whiner can't get his/her way and pouts about it on a whore board. There is a big difference in having an adult discussion with others whom you disagree with and telling people they are wrong, calling them names if they do not have your opinion. In addition, a member who bitches and moans about other members and even makes up shit to appease that agenda is a whiner as well.

So, constantly telling people to reread your post because they do not agree with you isn't any of the things you complain about at all. Because the only reason they disagree is because they just didn't understand what you wrote (or in one case what you meant but did not say)

This post is about what members feel is their way of contributing. Between all your handles, you have loved to say how many reviews you had. That was your cause, your championship, writing the most reviews. Paid premium access is contributing. Not choosing to post reviews for whatever reason is no one's business but that user.

Open your own site if you like, but as Alyssa so aptly stated, you get your troll title when we get your whiner title.

[Alyssa Marie]

Originally Posted by davidfree986

While the whiner can't get his/her way and pouts about it on a whore board.

thats kinda where i stopped paying attention. at least you know.

[Vic Kosslovich]

Originally Posted by Alyssa Marie

no, they shouldn't say troll. thats dumb.
unless the people that just whine day in and day out can get "baby" under their name too.

what you should do is block them when they get to the point of annoying you enough that it makes your day sad. you should also go back and make sure that you dont troll...

because a troll who posts reviews is no less annoying then a troll who doesn't post reviews.

Smartest thing I've read in this thread yet. Thank you for that.

My suggestion for the Op. Grow thicker skin or block those you don't wish to read.

[NYr]

Troll label one day....Dramatic label the next day.... Barebacker lable the next day....HIV carrier the next day....where would it end.

it is the Internet....trolls is a part of it in its natural form.

there are a VAST majority of gents who do not review at all...and who don't troll....so now you want to label them based on inaccurate criteria.

We could label some folks "White Knights"

[doug_dfw]

Originally Posted by davidfree986

That is true, but it also depends on what whining is and your definition of what a troll is.

IMO, both are someone who spews negativity on a constant basis. While the whiner can't get his/her way and pouts about it on a whore board. There is a big difference in having an adult discussion with others whom you disagree with and telling people they are wrong, calling them names if they do not have your opinion. In addition, a member who bitches and moans about other members and even makes up shit to appease that agenda is a whiner as well.

A troll is someone who, on a continuous basis, tries to promote their ill will towards another member(s), talks down condescendingly to others with their keyboard warrior mentality and tries to bait others to reply to their posts, trying to start a pissing contest, usually after a personal attack from left field, all the while in just about every scenario, hijacking threads in the process. They do so because they are miserable people, probably in RL as well, and misery loves company.

When a guy does reviews, maybe one every few months or so, at least he is contributing to what this board is about. Without reviews, this board would be nothing. But, even if a guy is a reviewer and is an asshat on the board, he is a better member of a review board (although not by much), then one who does not review and is the same type of ass. Many members on this site who have no reviews at all and even if he pays for premium access and does not review, if he constantly badgering others, trying to critique other reviewers on their review or is just an asshole on just about every thread he posts on, that is a troll.

What are you definitions?

You just described yourself so artically. As always

[KittyLamour]

Originally Posted by doug_dfw

You just described yourself so artically. As always

You hit that nail right on the head Doug! Maybe he was looking in the mirror when he was pointing that finger.

[Luke Skywalker]

Davidfree986,

When you were using the NearHauteRed handle, you resisted posting a review for along time, and articulated many times why you should not. Plus, you had plenty of negative drama with that handle. One of the reviews, you commented using DavjdFree986's handle.

When you were using BigDog611 , you compulsively reviewed and in many cases they looked embelished or fake. The drama you had on that handle culminated with you outting another member.

So, given that you alreadysaw both sides of this coin, being that you aldready been a non reviewing troll that posted a lot of negative drama, does that mean you don't like your NearHauteRed and BigDog611 handles and you are now a changed man?

Why not just say so rather than start another whinning thread?

[FunInDFW]

You can easily troll without being negative, fwiw.

[GuddKitty2589]

This is a Really good topic! I actually thought about Starting a thread myself, so kudos to you I STRONGLY BELIEVE IN EVERY GUY LEAVING A REVIEW. ISN'T THIS A REVIEW SITE TO SOME EXTENT? I'm Fairly New to Eccie and in my experience some clients look to those Reviews to Dictate which Providers they will or will not See. I have had Lots of Dates since I joined this site, Yet Very Few Reviews! But that's not the part that disturbs me the most, it's that these "Trolls" Lol �� look for Review Specials to get the Discount rate Only to Never leave a Review! Why Can't we Be Adults and Play Fair?

[Nina the Dicknapper]

if you dont review me, I will not be a reference for you or anything vouching you. It takes a quick sec to write a review. This is an INFORMATION EXCHANGE site. its just defeating the purpose of it if you guys can't take the time out to exchange info .

[guest071618-1]

<<< now, I am the troll in Eccie... Don't use that term loosely... Careful who you idiots calling troll... No one else can have that title other than me... Unless it is approved by me or many idiots and bitches..... My troll title was approved by many idiots and bitches...

[TheEccie214]

Originally Posted by eng

<<< now, I am the troll in Eccie... Don't use that term loosely... Careful who you idiots calling troll... No one else can have that title other than me... Unless it is approved by me or many idiots and bitches..... My troll title was approved by many idiots and bitches...

I thought your idiot title was the only approved thus far.

[Guest070818-1]

I tend to like guys who don't even have an account on this site and/or any hooker review board.

The guys who are spending money and getting laid don't have time to sit and post on the board.

[APerfectCircle]

Originally Posted by Adrienne Baptiste

I tend to like guys who don't even have an account on this site and/or any hooker review board.

The guys who are spending money and getting laid don't have time to sit and post on the board.

See, now that's an example of trolling.

[corona]

Originally Posted by doug_dfw

For the subject:
1 what is the definition of a negative remark considering our 1st Amendment?
2. what is someone's truth can be another's lie; how do you deal with that and not be pre-judgemental, hypocritical, and discriminatory?

The 1st Amendment only pertains to government limitations on freedom of speech. It doesn't apply to a silly hooker messageboard - but keep tryin!