The Mueller report

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

After Corney publicly confirmed the existence ofthe FBT's Russia investigation on March 20, 2017, the President was "beside himself' and expressed anger that Corney did not issue a statement correcting any misperception that the President himself was under investigation. The President sought to speak with Acting Attorney General Boente directly and told McGahn to contact Boente to request that Corney make a clarifying statement. The President then asked other intelligence community leaders to make public statements to refute the suggestion that the President had links to Russia, but the leaders told him they could not publicly comment on the
investigation. On March 30 and April 11, against the advice of White House advisors who had informed him that any direct contact with the FBI could be perceived as improper interference in an ongoing investigation, the President made personal outreaches to Corney asking him to "lift the cloud" ofthe Russia investigation by making public the fact that the President was not personally under investigation.

Through out Volume ll are incidents of Putin’s punk requesting that members of his swamp cover his fat lying ass. McGhan, McDonald, McFarland, Coates, Cohen, Comey, Sessions were all approached by Lardass to falsify documents, make public statements of his innocence and join his obstruction campaign. They all refused to cover for the lying piece of shit while he barked “Fake News”.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^DELUSION^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^

.....................REALITY
˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅

“I have long believed that a President can fire an FBI director for any reason, or for no reason at all,” Former FBI Director James Comey.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by rexdutchman

Corner stone of this country is "INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY" The liberal socialist what to change that little fact to ""Its what we say""

And very sadly its clear some people don't understand that statement ......

Horse shit, it’s crystal clear who has read the report and who hasn’t. The so called Freedom Caucus showed their ignorance of facts yesterday and displayed their loyalty to trump and Russia. It’s like they don’t give a damn that Russia cyber attacked this Country.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

^^^^^^^^^^^^^DELUSION^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^

.....................REALITY
˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅

Yeah sure, and the devoted followers of trump believed Mexico was going to pay for their wall.

Is Barr giving internet lessons on cherry picking....

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Horse shit, it’s crystal clear who has read the report and who hasn’t. The so called Freedom Caucus showed their ignorance of facts yesterday and displayed their loyalty to trump and Russia. It’s like they don’t give a damn that Russia cyber attacked this Country.

You're a case study proving that "reading" and "comprehension" are not synonyms.

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Yeah sure, and the devoted followers of trump believed Mexico was going to pay for their wall.

Is Barr giving internet lessons on cherry picking....

Barr underscored Mueller's findings wherein Mueller reported: “… the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference” and “... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime...”

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're a case study proving that "reading" and "comprehension" are not synonyms.



Barr underscored Mueller's findings wherein Mueller reported: “… the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference” and “... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime...”

The report didn’t exonerate the fat lying bastard either. Once again you cherry pick to protect your messiah and feed the deep state conspiracy bullshit.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

The report didn’t exonerate the fat lying bastard either. Once again you cherry pick to protect your messiah and feed the deep state conspiracy bullshit.

Hey Jax, I guess you missed Pelosi’s presser today. She said there’s not enough Democrat votes to impeach Trump. Guess why? They don’t have evidence of a crime. Neither did Mueller.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

The report didn’t exonerate the fat lying bastard either. Once again you cherry pick to protect your messiah and feed the deep state conspiracy bullshit.

Your notion that Trump needed to be "exonerated" when nary a single charge was leveled or prosecuted in an American court of law is intellectually flawed.

The presumption of innocence until proven guilty is the American standard; always has been.

Anyone who believes differently is the true traitor to the American way of life.

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by bambino

Hey Jax, I guess you missed Pelosi’s presser today. She said there’s not enough Democrat votes to impeach Trump. Guess why? They don’t have evidence of a crime. Neither did Mueller.

The plan is to impeach President Trump closer to the 2020 election. Evidence or no evidence. That's why Lawfare drug out the Mueller report until after the 2018 election accompanied by relentless media blitz.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by bambino

Hey Jax, I guess you missed Pelosi’s presser today. She said there’s not enough Democrat votes to impeach Trump. Guess why? They don’t have evidence of a crime. Neither did Mueller.

So..big fucking deal. She is referring to today’s count not thirty days from now.

No evidence my ass, the bloated one can’t allow his minions to view that evidence. That’s what obstruction looks like.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

So..big fucking deal. She is referring to today’s count not thirty days from now.

No evidence my ass, the bloated one can’t allow his minions to view that evidence. That’s what obstruction looks like.

I’ll give you credit for being tenacious. About what, I don’t know.,

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

So..big fucking deal. She is referring to today’s count not thirty days from now.

No evidence my ass, the bloated one can’t allow his minions to view that evidence. That’s what obstruction looks like.

Thirty days from now the Republicans will still be in control in the Senate. Trump's supporters understand what bloated hilebeest minions are too stupid to understand. An innocent man protesting his innocence against bogus allegations is not obstructing a damn thing.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Thirty days from now the Republicans will still be in control in the Senate. Trump's supporters understand what bloated hilebeest minions are too stupid to understand. An innocent man protesting his innocence against bogus allegations is not obstructing a damn thing.

We’ll soon find out the investigation was a crime.

[rexdutchman]

Delusional don't understand - Insufficient Evidence , followed by Innocent till proven guilty.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by bambino

We’ll soon find out the investigation was a crime.

Sure you will, but are you prepared for the truth. If that fat lying bastard is innocent so was OJ Simpson.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Sure you will, but are you prepared for the truth. If that fat lying bastard is innocent so was OJ Simpson.

Oh, I’m always prepared for the truth. You obviously are not.