Why Hillary will obliterate Drumpf.

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by lustylad

You don't have a clue about the law regarding negligence and the standards of care required for ALL government employees, especially including Cabinet members. Take a lesson from someone else who posts in this forum and understands classification rules much better than you do... he is appalled at Hillary for being "gross(ly) negligent and (showing) willful disregard for highly sensitive material... that puts US security superiority at very significant risk--a borderline treasonous act. Anything less than a long jail sentence is a joke."

http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1058216943&postcount=49

Lad, from your link. I guess you forgot to read this part.



This was copied from the link that was posted by LAD in Post #395.


The analysis also showed that the practice of using non-secure email systems to send sensitive information was widespread at the department and elsewhere in government.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...html?tid=a_inl

May I remind that this is from your link LAD. Mishandling of sensitive information was widespread at the state department and elsewhere in government.

Good luck getting an indictment with this. The FBI has had the emails for nine plus months. So far a grand jury has not been convened.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

Iffy don't count the chickens until the eggs are hatched. You need to vet those sources Iffy before you post!

Webe vettin...

Hypocrisy Much? Hillary Clinton I.T. Aide Seeks Protective Order From Sunlight – Lawyers Claim Will Plead Fifth Amendment if Deposed…

Posted on June 1, 2016 by sundance

Against Hillary Clinton making ridiculous assertions about the Trump University lawsuit, the development of her former Information Technology aide seeking a protective order to avoid deposition is, well, beyond laughable.



Brian Pagliano, Hillary Clinton’s IT specialist who set up the home-brewed email server, is now seeking an emergency protective order to keep recordings away from his deposition, and further claiming he will invoke his fifth amendment rights and not answer questions.

Here’s a pdf of the court filing:https://www.scribd.com/doc/314537412...-Order-Request

Apparently, Mr. Pagliano doesn’t like the thought of being on the receiving end of the Vince Foster treatment.

“Mr. Pagliano will invoke his right under the Fifth Amendment and decline to testify at the deposition.” Pagliano’s lawyers Mark MacDougall and Connor Mullin write. “Given the constitutional implications, the absence of any proper purpose for video recording the deposition, and the considerable risk of abuse, the Court should preclude Judicial Watch, Inc. from creating an audiovisual recording of Mr. Pagliano’s deposition.”

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Webe vettin...

Iffy, you did not get very far with that broken link from the Huffington post. Your guy in the video sounded like he had something.

[i'va biggen]

LOL


https://www.yahoo.com/news/clinton-b...224900732.html

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

Iffy, you did not get very far with that broken link from the Huffington post. Your guy in the video sounded like he had something.

fruitr65... Pay attention, this is what It's about...

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Seriously?



You don't have a clue about the law regarding negligence and the standards of care required for ALL government employees, especially including Cabinet members. Take a lesson from someone else who posts in this forum and understands classification rules much better than you do... he is appalled at Hillary for being "gross(ly) negligent and (showing) willful disregard for highly sensitive material... that puts US security superiority at very significant risk--a borderline treasonous act. Anything less than a long jail sentence is a joke."

http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1058216943&postcount=49

LAD, The FBI found hundreds of classified documents on computers of the mistress of General Petraus. Over 300 of the documents were marked "SECRET" . For knowlingly giving classified documents to his mistress who was not authorized to receive them, Patreaus had to resign from the CIA and pay $100,000 fine. I would say that is a pretty steep for an "MSOG".

Lad, you didn't hand me anything. All you did was prove how partisan you are. You still think Hillary is going to get indicted? Don't hold your breath. The case with the mistress and Petraus is just another example of how widespread the mishandling of classified information is in the government. Those UFC rules were put in place so that classified information did not end up in the hands of a spy, not to catch a sitting SOS in gotcha moment trying to communicate with staffers.


http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fbi...L&OCID=DELLDHP

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

LAD, The FBI found hundreds of classified documents on computers of the mistress of General Petraus. Over 300 of the documents were marked "SECRET" . For knowlingly giving classified documents to his mistress who was not authorized to receive them, Patreaus had to resign from the CIA and pay $100,000 fine. I would say that is a pretty steep for an "MSOG".

Lad, you didn't hand me anything. All you did was prove how partisan you are. You still think Hillary is going to get indicted? Don't hold your breath. The case with the mistress and Petraus is just another of widespread the mishandling classified information is in the government.


http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fbi...L&OCID=DELLDHP

well they let you out of the asylum for the night? Patreaus's mistress was actually a Major in the Army with a secret security clearance. was she authorized to see what Patreaus could see? no. but was Sidney Blumenthal authorized to see anything classified from Clinton? NO you fucking idiot.

yet he did. because some two-bit hacker got into his email.

it did cost Patreaus his job as chief of the CIA, and it will cost the hildewhore her shot at the White House. got that?

capisce?