The Mueller report

[WTF]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

Judge Napolitano of Fox has been saying for weeks that Trump committed obstruction of justice with this example.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

Judge Napolitano of Fox has been saying for weeks that Trump committed obstruction of justice with this example.

He's certainly been saying that, but often in a rather wishy washy, it was somewhat "indirect" obstruction, but under strict rule of law could be considered obstruction, but really couldn't be convicted in court so the House would need to do it through impeachment.

He's not saying anything largely different that Mueller concluded. Any reasonable prosecutor couldn't hold Trump to these charges legally, but if the House wants to proceed they certainly can.

Now if you want to suddenly decide you like what Napolitano advocates, the I'm sure you want all his other statements and judgments regarding Hillary and the left's involvement that have been both proven and covered up by Mueller to be thoroughly prosecuted too.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

Of the ten examples that Mueller listed, this one would be the easiest to prove. Even though McGahn did not carry out the request, you can be guilty of obstruction by making an attempt. I don't know if the case that Pelosi is trying to build will have anything stronger than this one example. Judge Napolitano of Fox has been saying for weeks that Trump committed obstruction of justice with this example.

Yep, three testimonies should do it, Mcgahn, Annie McDonald and Mueller. Combover Caligula knows he obstructed because he was advised against making the multiple attempts to remove Mueller. He asked Mcghan and KT McFarland to falsify documents to cover his lying ass.

[I B Hankering]

By the dim-retard's current definition of "obstruction", anyone that ever entered a plea of "not guilty" and paid for a defense attorney to be defended against charges is now somehow guilty of obstruction, and that, ladies, gentlemen and various miscreants, is a bullshit perversion of the American jurisprudence system.

An innocent man has the God-given right to protest his innocence without worrying about being charged with a process crime for protesting his innocence. Only true Stalinist-statists would believe otherwise.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

An innocent man has the God-given right to protest his innocence


.

So it is a God give right?

And what about guilty defendants, do they get a God given right?

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by WTF

So it is a God give right?

And what about guilty defendants, do they get a God given right?

in Texas they have the God given right to be executed.


arya .. ok with that?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

So it is a God give right?

And what about guilty defendants, do they get a God given right?

That's exactly what the fuck the Founding Fathers declared in the Declaration of Independence when they wrote: "... endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights ..."

Do you live under a government founded by a different group of men?

BTW, Trump isn't "guilty", and those who are literate and educated in the art of reading understand what Mueller meant when he declared: "... the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference” and “... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime...”

And even the "guilty" are presumed innocent until pronounced otherwise in a court of law. Only dim-retards don't understand that fundamental American principle.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

in Texas they have the God given right to be executed.


arya .. ok with that?

Yes, especially your ilk!

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That's exactly what the fuck the Founding Fathers declared in the Declaration of Independence when they wrote: "... endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights ..."

.

Who the fuck is your creator? God? You believe in a fucking God? Does he talk to you? Could you ask your imagery friend to write these things do for all to see?

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by WTF

+1

Good post WTF. Welcome back.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

+1

Good post WTF. Welcome back.

Poor bastard will be shunned now by Fox News~

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

Who the fuck is your creator? God? You believe in a fucking God? Does he talk to you? Could you ask your imagery friend to write these things do for all to see?

I have yet to see someone who believes as you do explain the origin of life without referencing a "belief" in some undocumented event at some point in an unknown past which no one witnessed or can actually explain.

In other words, your "belief" system is every bit as dependent on a man-made mythology, not known or explainable facts, as those of people you ridicule.

Hence your belief system is not, in fact, anymore credible than the belief system of someone who believes in a Supreme Being.

And you hanging your hat -- your faulty "belief" -- on Mueller's innuendo and slander while hypocritically ignoring Mueller's black letter opinion on actual guilt shows just how fucked-up your "belief system" can be.

Originally Posted by WTF

Poor bastard will be shunned now by Fox News~

FYI, this nation's sheep voted for hildebeest.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by WTF

Yes, especially your ilk!

my Ilk rules. your Ilk gets deported.

[Jaxson66]

After Corney publicly confirmed the existence ofthe FBT's Russia investigation on March 20, 2017, the President was "beside himself' and expressed anger that Corney did not issue a statement correcting any misperception that the President himself was under investigation. The President sought to speak with Acting Attorney General Boente directly and told McGahn to contact Boente to request that Corney make a clarifying statement. The President then asked other intelligence community leaders to make public statements to refute the suggestion that the President had links to Russia, but the leaders told him they could not publicly comment on the
investigation. On March 30 and April 11, against the advice of White House advisors who had informed him that any direct contact with the FBI could be perceived as improper interference in an ongoing investigation, the President made personal outreaches to Corney asking him to "lift the cloud" ofthe Russia investigation by making public the fact that the President was not personally under investigation.

Through out Volume ll are incidents of Putin’s punk requesting that members of his swamp cover his fat lying ass. McGhan, McDonald, McFarland, Coates, Cohen, Comey, Sessions were all approached by Lardass to falsify documents, make public statements of his innocence and join his obstruction campaign. They all refused to cover for the lying piece of shit while he barked “Fake News”.

[rexdutchman]

Corner stone of this country is "INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY" The liberal socialist what to change that little fact to ""Its what we say""

And very sadly its clear some people don't understand that statement ......