Reverse advertising

[slims099]

Eccie might as well start a section called "Provider Ads - Dallas"... oh wait, IT'S ALREADY THERE!!! Eccie also has a weekend specials section. My point is, those are their prices, if you can't pay 'em, maybe find someone else. I can recommend women for "low" prices who do great jobs and look great if you want to PM me.

And there would be no way in hell I'd post pictures of myself on here, not a great idea.

I think some of the guys would find it interesting to see who contacts them, but I just don't see it going very far.

[mufflover]

a question that would need to be answered is does this border on 'solicitation.'? I know all this is 'fantasy' anyway, but you never should say what services you are willing to pay for. ML

[ANONONE]

There also excellent post topics like this thread that give folks an opportunity to describe what they like and do not like:

[ame="http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=6985"]What really turns you on? this question is for men and women - ECCIE - Your source for escort reviews[/ame]

[Guest060812]

This is still a good idea, why it might work and how it might work is because some guys specifically may want certain activities, like greek, or cim, etc. While other guys may not. Some guys may like skinny girls, some may like full figured girls. Some guys may or may not want to see AA girls. Some guys may like younger Providers while others may prefer mature Providers. Some guys (ok most) want GFE, but other guys may not, or may want CBJ, etc.

If we, the Hobbyists, had a forum to place these ads, not just in coed, then the Providers could view them and respond to us if they were interested in what we were looking for. I am sure price would come into play, but for a lot of guys the activities and descriptions and taste in Provider may be equally important to the price.

Some Providers may choose to see a Hobbyist based on his post and what he is looking for. Just an ISO in coed would get lost really quickly, but an ISO section for Hobbyist to "reverse advertise" for the ladies would I presume be an area that Providers would be looking at.

[gameloading]

.

[Randall Creed]

If a provider that you have absolutely no desire or interest in seeing contacts you, she becomes a telemarketer.

[PoppyToyota]

If this happens, the thread starter should be the only one to post on the thread. Ladies should contact via PM and the only ones able to read. Once the guy has found a lady he should post under the original so he doesn't keep getting PM's about the date request.

Just a few ideas.....


Still not sure about the idea though. It would be pretty bad if I placed an ISO and didn't get a response. My male ego couldn't take it.....

[Peanut]

WOW, I didnt know I would create such a stir with this post. I would be willing to place an ad without a face pic. Showcase would be cool also.

I agree with not being about to post to others ads.
As far as the money issue...ladies do list their prices, say the lady lists $250 and in ur ad u list $215. the lady offers all you want and is willing to go with $215 and she writes you cool...the rate is between 2 adults. (on the review if one is made, the reviewer doesnt have to list the argeed upon price. List her regular rate. Because if he contatced her he would be paying the regular rate away.)

[gameloading]

If a lady did agree to drop her price for you that the service might not be quite up to her norm. That might bring a less than stellar review. That in turn could lead to her not wanting to answer any future requests.
But on the flip side, if a lady could see a blurred out photo of the client and he has positive references, she may have a desire to provide her service at a different pricepoint as the element of risk has been greatly reduced.

[Peanut]

I believe hobbist advertising could go either way...but so does the provider advertisements. They look great, got good reviews and bam the provider and hobbist not click and the one hobbist has a not so stellar session.

If the lady is willing to have a session at a lower rate (and she made initial contact) then she should give the same service as at her normal rate.

[looiecypher]

Doesn't sound like a workable idea to me.
Most men would never consider posting their pics.
Too many of the guys are married,may as well hand the SO a smoking gun.
As others have said one or two things would happen.You would either get zero response or more than you want.
I really think that this site and P411 and others do the same thing.The reviews let us know what the ladies will do and for how much.
If you want to haggle prices got to a bazaar or flea market.
Or just take your chances on bp and craigslist.
Now just posting a small add stating what you are looking for without a pic is workable but then again thats what iso's are for.

[slims099]

You're right. Every purpose that this idea brings up is already served on Eccie. ISO's, Provider Ad's, that's about it.

[selot]

If it ever gets set up, I would try it. Doesn't seem to be that bad of an idea.

[npita]

You can already do this sort of thing to some extent on p411 - it's called your client profile. Before I stopped hobbying, I had a rather lengthy set of expectations posted. The problem was, that every provider I contacted told me she had no problem meeting those expectations. My guess is that the providers you would want to see don't need to shop for clients.

[PODarkness]

I could see it working better for the more unusual services that the ladies generally don't post prices for, such as photography & video, more than one customer, women, etc.

As for using a reverse ad to find a standard GFE date, I can imagine providers browsing the reverse ads to fix a short term cash flow problem, rather than posting an ad with lowered rates and praying it will fix their cash flow.

It would lower the number of "specials" being advertised by providers, by giving them an alternate solution. One that doesn't lower the rate for everyone who would have made an appointment anyway. It sounds like a smart move for the provider, and a lucky day for the guy who advertised.