Assault weapons ban

[golferguy55]

Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Start a petition in the civie world.
Good luck

Better yet run for office in Texas on that platform and see how that works out for you.

[Budman]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Same ol responses that hold zero sand.
Yawn
There is no reason to own these weapons. I've heard it all. Ban em and shred em.
These weapons are casting bad light to regular guns and their owners.
Ban them

I got all of my guns together, pistols, rifles, ARs and even my air pellet gun. I ask if any of them felt like the ARs were casting them in a bad light. Not one had anything negative to say about Mr. AR. Maybe they were afraid of the big bad assault AR. I don't know what to make of this. Maybe I need to take them to a safe space and try again.

[reddog1951]

Watch this short humorous Tik Tok. Cute, but effective defusion of the argument thatassault rifles are necessary to defend against an "unjust" government. I suspect Trump has seen it as well....

[reddog1951]

Sorry guys, forgot the link:
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8NMJESR/

[Ripmany]

There won't let me have a gun anyway there thank my guy right away before you. So please explain why I should give a rat ass

[Jacuzzme]

Originally Posted by reddog1951

Sorry guys, forgot the link:
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8NMJESR/

Problem with the guy’s bit is that the US citizens, including millions of veterans, would stomp the shit out of the US military. Our military can’t even subdue a sparsely occupied country full of goat herders, let alone tens of millions of armed citizens. The founders intentions are every bit as valid today as they were in 1787.

Not to mention 95% of the military would defect before firing on Americans.

[Salty Again]

... And so would the local police - they WON'T be coming
for the citizenry's guns either.

Hmmm... Maybe the governments can get the homeless to attempt
to confiscate all the guns.... ... Good Luck!

#### Salty

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Problem with the guy’s bit is that the US citizens, including millions of veterans, would stomp the shit out of the US military. Our military can’t even subdue a sparsely occupied country full of goat herders, let alone tens of millions of armed citizens. The founders intentions are every bit as valid today as they were in 1787.

Not to mention 95% of the military would defect before firing on Americans.

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... And so would the local police - they WON'T be coming
for the citizenry's guns either.

Hmmm... Maybe the governments can get the homeless to attempt
to confiscate all the guns.... ... Good Luck!

#### Salty

Getting way off subject.
Don't law abiding responsible gun owners want public safety. Cut down on mass shootings? Many do! Getting rid and Banning weapons of war will help tremendously. They serve no value in the populace. Zero reason to have high cap magazines either. Ban em and send them to the shredders. For public safety!

[Jacuzzme]

You don’t give half a fuck about “public safety” and clearly have no idea what a “weapon of war” is.

[corona]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Same ol responses that hold zero sand.
Yawn
There is no reason to own these weapons. I've heard it all. Ban em and shred em.
These weapons are casting bad light to regular guns and their owners.
Ban them

Still waiting on your crime stats regarding legally owned full automatic weapons...


Oh that's right, you don't have any because you're just a troll.



A justification for ownership isn't required. So u less you get a supermajority of people and politicians to agree and push through a constitutional amendment, be quiet.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by reddog1951

Watch this short humorous Tik Tok. Cute, but effective defusion of the argument thatassault rifles are necessary to defend against an "unjust" government. I suspect Trump has seen it as well....

Yeah, the Taliban and Viet Cong would like a word with the belief that taking down the worlds preeminent military with rifles.

This is what passes for genius on the left.

[HoHound]

This is why everyone should have an AR-15 or an AK-47. Mine isn't full auto nor do I want it to be. It would waste too much ammo. The second amendment isn't for self defense or hunting. It's a citizenry check on government, which always seeks more power and control. To deny this is naive. Just look around the world for examples.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Getting way off subject.
Don't law abiding responsible gun owners want public safety. Cut down on mass shootings? Many do! Getting rid and Banning weapons of war will help tremendously. They serve no value in the populace. Zero reason to have high cap magazines either. Ban em and send them to the shredders. For public safety!

Well, if a Law-abiding gun owner would have been around on this day maybe, just maybe this multiple stabbing rampage resulting in four people killed and seven seriously wounded wouldn't have happened. One doesn't need a gun to kill, and it doesn't really matter the type of firearm used to stop it but grabbing an AR-15 isn't a bad choice.
https://abc7chicago.com/rockford-sta...news/14582204/

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Problem with the guy’s bit is that the US citizens, including millions of veterans, would stomp the shit out of the US military. Our military can’t even subdue a sparsely occupied country full of goat herders, let alone tens of millions of armed citizens. The founders intentions are every bit as valid today as they were in 1787.

Not to mention 95% of the military would defect before firing on Americans.

The soldiers that would say no to firing on US Citizens are thankfully concentrated at the sharp point of the spear.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Not to mention 95% of the military would defect before firing on Americans.

The only way we’re going to have real firearms reform in the United States is if the second amendment is rewritten or removed. The number of gun owners in the US makes that nigh on impossible.

As far as the military firing on civilians. I refer to the Kent State Massacre.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings

Twenty-eight National Guard soldiers fired about 67 rounds over 13 seconds, killing four students and wounding nine others, one of whom suffered permanent paralysis. Students Allison Krause, 19, Jeffrey Miller, 20, and Sandra Scheuer, 20, died on the scene, while William Schroeder, 19, was pronounced dead at Robinson Memorial Hospital in nearby Ravenna shortly afterward.