trump calls for "termination" of U.S. Constitution in order to overturn a free and fair election

[Devo]

Originally Posted by tommy156

Lol. We already allowed an unfairly elected candidate to have the victory... on Nov 8, 2016. Never again.

I thought only conservatives were election deniers?

[eyecu2]

Insight from the Lincoln Project


“Dear MAGA, we have some bad news. No, not that he lost. Not that your little coup attempt failed and its planners and the attackers are going to jail. No. The really bad news is why Trump told you he lost. Why he set it up way before the 2020 election. It wasn’t voter fraud but it was fraud.
“Trump told you the election was stolen ripped you off, to sucker you, to take your hard-earned money and shovel it into his pockets. He spent it on himself not to take back the White House.
“It was the biggest scam in political history. Every dollar you sent him paid to keep his shady business empire and lavish lifestyle going. It was a sucker game all along. And you know who the sucker is? You.”

[Devo]

Originally Posted by rmg_35

Like how berry, chizzy, devo, Waco are trying to take over the thread. It's about tRump wanting to throw out the Constitution and be declared president. You guys can keep your posts about Biden and hunter's laptop on your threads... you sure post enough about that on your own.

So why don't you tell us why it's acceptable for your lord the treasonist tangerine turd to want to throw out the Constitution and name him president and why you support this treasonist idea.

Why don't you grow up, drop the insulting terms and try and ask a serious question?

You can go back and reply to my post about the ramifications of what Twitter did, and, the constitutional implications if, a collusion to undermine one candidate did occur, and, whether it crosses the line into severe first amendment violations, and then, how to resolve them.

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by Devo

I thought only conservatives were election deniers?

Maybe brush up on your reading comprehension a bit? I never denied he won the electoral college, but it was proven that he had help from his Daddy Dom Putin. Hence, he was unfairly elected... but he was elected. I never denied that.

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by Devo

Why don't you grow up, drop the insulting terms and try and ask a serious question?

You can go back and reply to my post about the ramifications of what Twitter did, and, the constitutional implications if, a collusion to undermine one candidate did occur, and, whether it crosses the line into severe first amendment violations, and then, how to resolve them.

I see you're still unable to answer a simple, direct question about trump wanting to "terminate" the U.S. Constitution. Why is that acceptable to you? That a former POTUS is calling for the "termination" of the very document he swore an oath to protect and uphold? Where's your "Constitutional Conservative" outrage at that? ANSWER THE QUESTION.

[Jacuzzme]

Originally Posted by tommy156

I'm not denying he won the electoral college. Never did.

But he clearly had help from his Daddy Dom Putin.

Wow. You found something that 300 lawyers with an unlimited budget couldn’t. Bravisima!

[tommy156]

But there's absolutely no debate that Russia did indeed meddle in the 2016 election. There's also no debate that they did so with the intent of helping trump win. None of that is in question.

Then trump went on to defend Putin in front of the world at the Helsinki Summit in 2018. On video, for all to see.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by tommy156

But there's absolutely no debate that Russia did indeed meddle in the 2016 election. There's also no debate that they did so with the intent of helping trump win. None of that is in question.

Then trump went on to defend Putin in front of the world at the Helsinki Summit in 2018. On video, for all to see.

LOL

The libs that say 3 Russian Facebook ads stole the 2016 election for Trump are telling us that the twitter censorship to protect Biden was no big deal.

[Jacuzzme]

None of it’s in question because all of it is ridiculous bullshit.

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

None of it’s in question because all of it is ridiculous bullshit.

https://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p...50&postcount=1

Now, with that out of the way let's get back on track. Do any of the folks on the right support the termination of all rules, including the constitution as was called for?

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Do any of the folks on the right support the termination of all rules, including the constitution as was called for?

So to clarify, are you asking about a poorly worded statement from President Trump that didn't call for what you claim, OR do you mean ACTUALLY ignoring and terminating the constitution like Senile Biden has done repeatedly by claiming:

the right to bail out student loans
the right to suspend evictions
refusing to enforce immigration law
refusing to defend the border at all

[HDGristle]

Anything other than "No" will be read as you hating the Constitution.

Turley agrees that what Trump called for has no legitimate basis.

So please, please, don't try to carry this man's water or put words in his mouth and join him in his utter disdain and contempt for the Constitution. The attempts at equivocations or whattaboutism aren't justification, either.

[berryberry]

You didn't answer the question Gristle

So to clarify, are you asking about a poorly worded statement from President Trump that didn't call for what you claim, OR do you mean ACTUALLY ignoring and terminating the constitution like Senile Biden has done repeatedly by claiming:

the right to bail out student loans
the right to suspend evictions
refusing to enforce immigration law
refusing to defend the border at all

[HDGristle]

The continued deflection via sunk premise and equivocation masked as seeking clarification is noted.

Turley, McConnell and a host of others were perfectly able to speak directly and address this. No games. No spin. No equivocation. No blaming or comparing Biden's dumbass takes or misdeeds for Trump's bullshit through whattaboutism.

Doesn't even require courage, just intellectual honesty, a love of country and of the constitution.

Chizzy has that type of courage and my respect

[berryberry]

Still afraid to answer the question Gristle.

Why is that? Not that I am surprised - it's par for the course, but come on, try and answer for a change instead of always deflecting

So to clarify, are you asking about a poorly worded statement from President Trump that didn't call for what you claim, OR do you mean ACTUALLY ignoring and terminating the constitution like Senile Biden has done repeatedly by claiming:

the right to bail out student loans
the right to suspend evictions
refusing to enforce immigration law
refusing to defend the border at all