It seems you gun control fruit cakes always try to use the same false equivalency to equate anything that goes bang to a weapon of mass destruction.
Technically, people can own a tank - Arnold does.
Technically, people can own explosive, incendiary, or poison gas, including bombs, grenades, rockets, missiles, mines and similar devices according to NFA (the Feds). Though I am not aware of any states that permit most of them.
So let's saddle up that one midget-pony brain power of yours and ask - why do you think your false equivalency bullshit makes sense to people with more than an ameba level thought process?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechPapi
So none of the 2nd worshipers want to answer the question asked about whether it is infringement to own a nuke? You guys always seem to stop at that one. Tanks? RPGs? Ballistic missiles? Any restrictions at all?
I know..it's powerful to have to think about stuff, but put your soft little noggins together. Maybe you'll come up with something.
|