This seems fair....

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

ok, I'll bite for a few minutes..

if it fabricated, then it is not true, one can objectively conclude, right?

why did YOUR guy pony up the transcript and fuel the fan for impeachment?

Once again your notion of events is faulty. Pelosi announced that she was advocating for impeachment BEFORE she had read damn thing. So, your notion that the move for impeachment was based on actual evidence -- e.g., the transcript -- is bullshit. And the transcript in no manner rises to "high crimes and misdemeanors" required for the impeachment, and Pelosi didn't read it before she advocated for impeachment.

[Hotrod511]

Originally Posted by WTF

And I sound like an idiot too...

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Hotrod511

[/COLOR] I wanna suck WTF's cock

Quit changing wtf I post Hotrod or not...

[bambino]

Originally Posted by eccielover

Of course he can't be impeached. The Dems have nothing but supposition in all of the bullshit they spew. And it's funny you ask where people get their news, when it's been shown that the lefty Army get their "news" from lefty opinion outlets and not actual "news".

But don't let the "fact" that the impeachment inquiry, but well maybe not a full blown impeachment inquiry, according to Nancy, is already starting to flounder under its own weight.

He actually can be impeached, and probably will. Given the libtards thirst for torturing Trump, it will happen. The Senate won’t convict.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by bambino

He actually can be impeached, and probably will. Given the libtards thirst for torturing Trump, it will happen. The Senate won’t convict.

exactly. Trump can be impeached for virtually anything. for better or worse the criteria to impeach is so vague that you could even impeach a president simply because you don't like him .. oh wait ..


BAHHAHHAAAAAAA

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by WTF

How do you know he was shitting winn dixie? Was he sitting on your mouth?

wtf's implosion has begun! How much longer will he last? I think wtf will have mail soon.

bahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[themystic]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

exactly. Trump can be impeached for virtually anything. for better or worse the criteria to impeach is so vague that you could even impeach a president simply because you don't like him .. oh wait ..


BAHHAHHAAAAAAA

but king Donald said he couldn't be impeached because hes doing such a great job. did something happen?

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by themystic

but king Donald said he couldn't be impeached because hes doing such a great job. did something happen?

Nope. the leftists hated him then, they hate him now. i'm surprised they are trying this flimsy shit but time it running out on 2020 so they are desperate. Mueller let them down. the intelligence community (sic) have no legal right to the privileged conversations of a president. not only have they misused the so-called whistle-blower rules they have committed violations of national security.


the constitution is clear, only the president has the authority to conduct foreign policy with other nations. the only role Congress plays is in ratifying formal treaties. a conversation with the president of Ukraine isn't a formal treaty.

so what right does Congress have to privileged conversations of a president?

NONE.


thank you valued troll!

[WTF]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

wtf's implosion has begun! How much longer will he last? I think wtf will have mail soon.

bahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by WTF

This post is embarrassing. Even for you wtf! You commented so you do care.

We can tell you didnt take any self improvement classes on your vacation.

bahahahahahahahahahahahaaa

[Chung Tran]

semi-random thought..

not one person on here has brought up as evidence for Trump's "innocence", the language from the Ukraine President that Trump didn't "push" him to investigate Biden.

I guess even Right-Wingers saw through that comedy routine.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

semi-random thought..

not one person on here has brought up as evidence for Trump's "innocence", the language from the Ukraine President that Trump didn't "push" him to investigate Biden.

I guess even Right-Wingers saw through that comedy routine.

Article II of the United States' Constitution says he innocent. Your refusal to acknowledge that elementary fact is YOUR mental error.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

semi-random thought..

not one person on here has brought up as evidence for Trump's "innocence", the language from the Ukraine President that Trump didn't "push" him to investigate Biden.

I guess even Right-Wingers saw through that comedy routine.

still waiting for those crimes against the constitution ...

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

semi-random thought..

not one person on here has brought up as evidence for Trump's "innocence", the language from the Ukraine President that Trump didn't "push" him to investigate Biden.

I guess even Right-Wingers saw through that comedy routine.

See, you answer your own thoughts.

It's obvious that the TDS in the left has already caused them to ignore outright video evidence and testimony of the one "supposedly pressured" by Trump.

It's already more important to take "someone's" interpretation of the phone call and a second/third hand whistle blower complaint than accept the words of the two who actually had the call.

So, since you brought it up. Why are you summarily dismissing the statements from the Ukraine President?

[rexdutchman]