Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
I'm baaaaaaaaccccckkkkk! Top Ten Fancy Rumors Dispelled
test
Coed Discussions - HoustonBoth male and female members can mingle and interact here. Let's keep these discussions on-topic, thought-provoking, and more importantly...entertaining!
So, Fancy has joined the potty mouth club...........and is proud of it?
You must have missed the OP post...where she said that she didn't join the potty mouth club, and that St.Christopher agreed that it was a factual statement. Given that I was banned permanently for being a manhandle, and that it took St.Christopher to reverse the decision despite local input that it would be fixed...
I tend to believe both Fancy and St.Christopher. But that's just me.
You must have missed the OP post...where she said that she didn't join the potty mouth club, and that St.Christopher agreed that it was a factual statement. Given that I was banned permanently for being a manhandle, and that it took St.Christopher to reverse the decision despite local input that it would be fixed...
I tend to believe both Fancy and St.Christopher. But that's just me.
Sometimes one needs to be able to read between the lines to understand what was actually said...As far as I can tell, he did not agree to that. He agreed that she did violate outing rules, he agreed that the rules in infoshare were murky about outing. He agreed to a one month ban instead of a year because of that murkiness. But common sense says that in fact there was a outing issue because she received a one month ban. If she were to do the exact same thing again, she would receive a one year ban because now the rules are crystal clear.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fancyinheels
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The sole infraction that got me kicked to the curb occurred away from the public forums in a private provider-only section of our wicked world,
TG, This ^ was where the infraction occurred. Infoshare
There seemed to be confusion over what (if any, per inexact guidelines at the time that were evidently subject to interpretation) rule I had violated initially, a wee bit of overreaction may have occurred, but after the matter was further researched, the ban was rescinded the VERY NEXT DAY from one year to one month.
This was why it was rescinded from a year to a month. Translation: The rules in infoshare were such that the ladies thought they could blast out gents personal information.
I did post some incomplete data about the fellow who contacted me in an endeavor to verify whether or not this individual had “borrowed” the handle in question and might even be dangerous...
This is called a justification. An admittance of guilt followed by a justification.
I DIDN’T billboard anyone’s entire personal life and identity all over the Internet, so take the corpse of that rumor and send it to the funeral home, please.
This is called a lie wrapped in a tad bit of truth. Say Fancy did not post my full name but enough information to figure it out. She says she did not post my entire personal life, which is true but it is hardly the truth.
. At the time I didn’t do anything inquiry-wise different than what MANY other pussy-slingers have done before WITHOUT being excommunicated, but it’s over and done with and I don’t wish to whine about it. Protocols have since been retooled and microscopically clarified so that this is a dead-end issue, never to recur. (At least with me.) !
Again, This was why it was rescinded from a year to a month. Translation: The rules in infoshare were such that the ladies thought they could blast out gents personal information. That lack of oversight concerning our personal information seems to have been cleared up.
Oh, one more thing: For those of you ready to flame-broil my narrative like a choice ribeye, I ran the entire post above past St. Chris first to make sure that I was representing the facts accurately to the best of my knowledge (he has the full public, private, modly lowdown, of course) without violating any confidentiality, and he was absolutely fine with what I've written EXACTLY as typed. Gave me some good advice about not fretting too much over idle babble that will pass, making a statement and then getting on about frisky business. I thank him especially for his kindness, as I was feeling awfully apprehensive about treading the turbulent waters of ECCIE again. These our one sided facts that she does not want questioned and I can not say as I blame her because they do not pass the smell test.
!
I have no bones against Fancy but an objective reading of what has transpired sure looks as if the rules in infoshare were such that the ladies thought they could post our personal information. That seems to have changed and if you want to congratulate Fancy for that change be my guest but I will pass ... Next you have to ask the ladies just wtf they have been thinking all these years? I am glad that eccie took corrective action in this matter.
Oh, one more thing: For those of you ready to flame-broil my narrative like a choice ribeye, I ran the entire post above past St. Chris first to make sure that I was representing the facts accurately to the best of my knowledge (he has the full public, private, modly lowdown, of course) without violating any confidentiality, and he was absolutely fine with what I've written EXACTLY as typed.
Wow. St. Chris had time to read all that green crap but he didn't have time to reply to my request to make a review of the inappropriately awarded points Pete gave me?
My Bio Page - Texas - Houston
Well Done...
