I blame OBAMA

[JD Barleycorn]

What was the growth rate of the economy in the last four years? The highest was 2.4% with is about a third of what it was during the Reagan recovery.

How many people are still out of work since the start of the recession? About 9 million people are still out of work. Reagan's recovery created 25 million jobs, Obama hasn't arrived back at zero yet.

The majority of the economists give the rise of the stock market to the QE programs which can't be maintained and they have already caused damaged that will occur when they end. Kind of like a drug.

We have had some more embassy personnel shot in a strip club just this week. We have had more people killed in Chicago than in Afghanistan this last few years. We have lost more people in Afghanistan under Obama than under Bush. Obama has already given up in Afghanistan so the estimated 280 people that we lose between now and September of 2014 are just a waste of life. That doesn't even count the injuries (physical and mental) that will also occur. I could even point out that Egypt among many other countries had fallen into the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood who are our enemies. We are losing the war on Muslim terrorism. Not to mention Boston and Fort Hood.

The IRS is acting as a secret police backed up the Justice department against the opponents of Obama.

Fanny, Freddie, and the bank have yet to pay back the billions that they owe the general fund (our tax dollars). They are far from being in the black.

Yes, I do blame Obama.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Yes, I do blame Obama.

WTF else is new?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CJ7

the course of this country has improved since Bush left office but not one single rightwinger will admit it

.. plus a bunch of other folks.

RCP Poll Average
Direction of Country 31.7% Right Direction 58.0% Wrong Track
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...untry-902.html

31.7 % say "right direction"
58.0 % say "wrong track"

If you are correct ... the "right wingers" are holding a 58 % slot now.

As far as Obaminable is concerned ...

... he's enjoying an increasing DISAPPROVAL RATING.

The longer he hangs on to Holder, the higher it will get. I think the problem he has with ditching Holder is a concern over Holder's loyalty to him ... for the duration of his stay at the White House.

By this time next year, Hillary is going to have to start distancing herself from Obaminable and with Holder on his ass too his "legacy" will be in jeopardy.

[Uncle Han]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

You are beginning to sound like COF - everyone who did not vote for Ron Paul in the last election has been brain washed by the liberal media. The reason the USA is broke is because Bush lowered taxes for everyone (all seven tax brackets) and started two wars at 20 billion per month. The tax cuts, the wars and his trillion dollar prescription drug program ( none of these were paid for) then you also have Wall Street losing a Trillion + dollars trading unregulated securities. The one percent have not paid any taxes for eleven plus years( they are able to lower their effective tax rate to like 15 - 18 percent Mitt, Buffet and even Obama's tax rate was 18%). But Obama has raised the the tax percentage for the one per cent from 35.5 to 39% as a starting point. The same percentage it was under Clinton. That is the real reason why the USA is broke. The Clinton tax rate percentages should have never been lowered. Clintons last year in office was the last time the Federal Government had a surplus. Bush wiped that out real quick. It's true that the USA imports more than it exports, but Bush screwed up the checkbook of the Federal Government with his decisions. There was no reason for a surplus from Clinton to be turned into a deficit under Bush. One thing, I believe that helping seniors pay for their medications is the right thing to do, it's just that Bush did not pay for it, he borrowed the money from China. By the way, not all options for performance on your Mutual Fund/401K/IRA are tied to the interest rate. Only the fixed percentage option is. If select an option that is based on the large company index ( that will be based on the close of the DJIA, or S&P five hundred) You could have 100 per cent of your fund based on what the DJIA does, the interest rate won't matter. So for example let's say your fund had Google, IBM and Exxon/Mobil if these stocks keep going up your fund will go up , it won't matter what the prime lending interest rate is. Most financial advisors will tell you to mix the percentages or diversify. You could have all your eggs in one category, so your statement about the interest rate is not true, it depends on how your fund is set up and what you selected.

Another useful idiot talking about things which are too complicated for him to understand! LOL! These radical ass-clowns are too funny!

[Uncle Han]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Can't blame Bush forever? It's been 5 years, for Christ's sake! We haven't yet felt the full effect of his fucked up policy blunders, both foreign and domestic.

If you have children (I don't care by whom, GOOBER) then they'll be blaming Bush too!

Kcoc Rider, maybe Bush should not have taken so much advice from Clinton! LOL! President Clinton sure enjoyed the peace dividends and economic growth earned by the policies of previous RR administration. China was glad to see the old men go and Clinton come in. Nobody in the world was afraid of Clinton! LOL!

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

.. plus a bunch of other folks.

RCP Poll Average
Direction of Country 31.7% Right Direction 58.0% Wrong Track
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...untry-902.html

31.7 % say "right direction"
58.0 % say "wrong track"

If you are correct ... the "right wingers" are holding a 58 % slot now.

As far as Obaminable is concerned ...

... he's enjoying an increasing DISAPPROVAL RATING.

The longer he hangs on to Holder, the higher it will get. I think the problem he has with ditching Holder is a concern over Holder's loyalty to him ... for the duration of his stay at the White House.

By this time next year, Hillary is going to have to start distancing herself from Obaminable and with Holder on his ass too his "legacy" will be in jeopardy.

disapproval rating ?
gee, guess he wont be elected again huh?

[NiceGuy53]

Originally Posted by CJ7

disapproval rating ?
gee, guess he wont be elected again huh?

So because Odumbo can not run again for president and doesn't have to worry about being re-elected, he doesn't care about his "legacy" and doesn't care if his 2nd term goes down the toilet. Interesting logic, CBJ7. But that is exactly what I expect from you.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

So because Odumbo can not run again for president and doesn't have to worry about being re-elected, he doesn't care about his "legacy" and doesn't care if his 2nd term goes down the toilet. Interesting logic, CBJ7. But that is exactly what I expect from you.

ha has quite a bit of room left on the down chart before he catshes W ' s disapproval ratings.. last time I checked W wasn't hurting too damn bad

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Uncle Han

Kcoc Rider, maybe Bush should not have taken so much advice from Clinton! LOL! President Clinton sure enjoyed the peace dividends and economic growth earned by the policies of previous RR administration. China was glad to see the old men go and Clinton come in. Nobody in the world was afraid of Clinton! LOL!

Well, douchebag, if that was the case, then why did they wait for Shrub to be elected before attacking?

Also, great, wise and incredibly bellicose one... If Clinton was riding on the Reagan prosperity (snick) then why wasn't Bush, the elder, reflected?

Your grasp of history is only rivaled by your mastery of logic. You LOL a lot, but you really don't make too much fucking sense, do you? We really need another dipshit Teabagger here... Why don't you check you helmet at the door and stay awhile?

May I say, sir, for the first time, that you are a fucking idiot!

[Uncle Han]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Well, douchebag, if that was the case, then why did they wait for Shrub to be elected before attacking?

Also, great, wise and incredibly bellicose one... If Clinton was riding on the Reagan prosperity (snick) then why wasn't Bush, the elder, reflected?

Your grasp of history is only rivaled by your mastery of logic. You LOL a lot, but you really don't make too much fucking sense, do you? We really need another dipsh




it Teabagger here... Why don't you check you helmet at the door and stay awhile.

May I say, sir, for the first time, that you are a fucking idiot!

Why would it make sense to you Kcoc Rider? It's too complicated for you to understand. Just go back to sucking donkey cum out of Obama's ass. LOL!

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by Uncle Han

Why would it make sense to you Kcoc Rider? It's too complicated for you to understand. Just go back to sucking donkey cum out of Obama's ass. LOL!

how mature..

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by CJ7

how mature..

Snicker...LOL

[NiceGuy53]

Originally Posted by CJ7

how mature..

Yeah, your the poster boy of maturity in this forum! LMAO!

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Uncle Han

Why would it make sense to you Kcoc Rider? It's too complicated for you to understand. Just go back to sucking donkey cum out of Obama's ass. LOL!

fucking brilliant! I know now that you are incapable of civil debate...

FAGGOT!

(your turn, homo! LMAO!)

[Yssup Rider]

BUMP!