A question of pricing etiquette...

[guest102613-2]

Originally Posted by FREEATLAST

JONBALLS: Based on everything that I have been told about you and read myself I am under the opinion that any woman you take issue with couldn't buy better advertising than your negative comments about her. offshoredrilling: I think you are right about the lurkers. Of the 20+private messages I have received from people sharing their suggestions all but 5 or 6 have been for Miss Elizabeth. Every one of them specifically stated that it someone who did not post frequently, if at all. Since you're such a stickler for rules I would like to bring to your attention the following ECCIE General Conduct Guideline: "#6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not."

have a little more haterade buddy. your free to choose who you want to see and so am i

[jokacz]

Can we get an I.P. check on FREEATLAST?

Me thinks MsLiz has a new handle.

Or a bad shill.

[Guest091813]

freeatlast....you seem to have really strong opinions of folks that you have yet to even meet.. and you have been a member here only 3 calendar days....and this because of pm's you have received... have you stopped yet and thought about what those folks (the pmr's) agenda's are about .....ijs....

[jokacz]

Well, that's one way to get this thread locked. LOL

[Guest042416]

peace and love please be nice.

[FREEATLAST]

Originally Posted by anita germane

freeatlast....you seem to have really strong opinions of folks that you have yet to even meet.. and you have been a member here only 3 calendar days....and this because of pm's you have received... have you stopped yet and thought about what those folks (the pmr's) agenda's are about .....ijs....

Hi Anita,

You ask some very good and valid questions. I will gladly address them for you:

1. You are correct, I do have strong opinions about folks I have yet to even met. I have however spent time reading through a large quantity of threads in addition to the ones I have started or replied in and so far what I have been told and who I have been told it about has matched up perfectly in terms of behavior, attitudes, and general demeanor.

2. You are also correct that this information has been solely in PM's I have received.

3. As someone whose educational and experiential background is the clinical social sciences and designs and conducts behavioral research studies - yes, it did indeed occur to me after the first PM containing information and opinions about certain people that the sender might have some sort of personal agenda. It also occurred to me after the second and after the third. After the fourth, and the fifth, and the sixth, and so on, and what I had read for myself it became clear that what I was being told was credible. I'm not one inclined towards conspiracies, but even if all these people were working in concert towards some common agenda against other members and/or providers that wouldn't change the fact that what I was seeing - and now experiencing - for myself from the people I was being told about is congruent with what I was being told.

So, that said my question for you would be have you stopped to think that these folks who are suggesting I am a shill for a provider or even that provider herself, a provider whom none of them seemingly have or do patronize and openly mock and/or disparage, have their own agenda of some sort, possibly related to another provider whom they are all in good favor with, whether it is with her involvement or not?

If you are objective, impartial, and unbiased I would think your answer couldn't be anything but a "yes".

It is obvious that there is some degree of animosity between two providers on this site. It is also obvious that these two providers cater towards a different type of clientele with little, if any overlap. It is further obvious that one of these provider's client base is a vocal minority on this site and another is a silent majority with little interaction and overlap between the two, if at all. Both of these providers were recommended to me, some even by the same people. Miss Elizabeth was the overwhelming recommendation, almost four-to-one over Nikki. The only people who seem to be taking issue with me are the people who are open and unabashed in their support for Nikki. If it isn't obvious to you what is really going on, especially with the people implying that I am here to shill for Miss Elizabeth or that I am actually her then I can probably assume with a decent degree of accuracy that you yourself have some sort of personal agenda which is hostile towards Miss Elizabeth.

[Guest120615-3]

Well... what's the big secret here with regards to her rate?

Women are absolutely free to choice their rates but there is some sort of market for services. So how much did she want? For what amount of time and services? Maybe that's a Men Lounge sort of thing but I would just say it and let the other members chime in if it's a fair fee.

How pissed would you be if she was hosing you and the following week you read a review for $ less?

Well good luck.

[Guest091813]

Originally Posted by FREEATLAST

So, that said my question for you would be have you stopped to think that these folks who are suggesting I am a shill for a provider or even that provider herself, a provider whom none of them seemingly have or do patronize and openly mock and/or disparage, have their own agenda of some sort, possibly related to another provider whom they are all in good favor with, whether it is with her involvement or not?

If you are objective, impartial, and unbiased I would think your answer couldn't be anything but a "yes".

actually ..you should stop..and not imply what my answer would be..because sir..... u do not know me and i do not know you at least under the handle you are posting under......and if you did and personally met me..you would understand im a straight shooter...

i dont take sides..i take the info from both analyze it and come up with an unbiased opinion...I just shoot out the facts of both sides....and shoot it out there in an unbiased way.....cuz thats what a person that has no agenda's would do..

im not gonna tell ya what to do ..or tell you who to like for what ever reason or tell you who not to like for whatever reason...cuz thats what a real unbiased person would do.. now i have spoken to folks in regards to my personal interaction with certain folks if a person has inquired about dealing with that certain person.....personal interaction has alot to say about what my ideas are in regards to that individual...however if i have nver met them...its unbiased...just the facts..sir..just the facts..

[jackfengshui]

It is an amazing transformation from this:

Originally Posted by FREEATLAST

I am FREE AT LAST in Rochester and can't wait to start making up for lost time!
I found this site and another called eRAPS but it didn't seem like there was much activity going on there so I registered here.
I'm not entirely sure what to expect from this community so I guess my plan is not to have any expectations at all and just jump right in.

to this:

Originally Posted by FREEATLAST

I do have strong opinions about folks I have yet to even met. I have however spent time reading through a large quantity of threads in addition to the ones I have started or replied in and so far what I have been told and who I have been told it about has matched up perfectly in terms of behavior, attitudes, and general demeanor.

in two days!

[elghund]

HEY........DOOVE!!!!!!!!!


Jump in here anytime, willya?



elg.......

[Whitenoise]

I call bullshit and I am not an unabashed supporter of Nikki. IJS....

Originally Posted by FREEATLAST

Hi Anita,

You ask some very good and valid questions. I will gladly address them for you:

1. You are correct, I do have strong opinions about folks I have yet to even met. I have however spent time reading through a large quantity of threads in addition to the ones I have started or replied in and so far what I have been told and who I have been told it about has matched up perfectly in terms of behavior, attitudes, and general demeanor.

2. You are also correct that this information has been solely in PM's I have received.

3. As someone whose educational and experiential background is the clinical social sciences and designs and conducts behavioral research studies - yes, it did indeed occur to me after the first PM containing information and opinions about certain people that the sender might have some sort of personal agenda. It also occurred to me after the second and after the third. After the fourth, and the fifth, and the sixth, and so on, and what I had read for myself it became clear that what I was being told was credible. I'm not one inclined towards conspiracies, but even if all these people were working in concert towards some common agenda against other members and/or providers that wouldn't change the fact that what I was seeing - and now experiencing - for myself from the people I was being told about is congruent with what I was being told.

So, that said my question for you would be have you stopped to think that these folks who are suggesting I am a shill for a provider or even that provider herself, a provider whom none of them seemingly have or do patronize and openly mock and/or disparage, have their own agenda of some sort, possibly related to another provider whom they are all in good favor with, whether it is with her involvement or not?

If you are objective, impartial, and unbiased I would think your answer couldn't be anything but a "yes".

It is obvious that there is some degree of animosity between two providers on this site. It is also obvious that these two providers cater towards a different type of clientele with little, if any overlap. It is further obvious that one of these provider's client base is a vocal minority on this site and another is a silent majority with little interaction and overlap between the two, if at all. Both of these providers were recommended to me, some even by the same people. Miss Elizabeth was the overwhelming recommendation, almost four-to-one over Nikki. The only people who seem to be taking issue with me are the people who are open and unabashed in their support for Nikki. If it isn't obvious to you what is really going on, especially with the people implying that I am here to shill for Miss Elizabeth or that I am actually her then I can probably assume with a decent degree of accuracy that you yourself have some sort of personal agenda which is hostile towards Miss Elizabeth.

[roscoe14850]

Stinky poo!

[FREEATLAST]

Originally Posted by jackfengshui

It is an amazing transformation from this:



to this:



in two days!

Which part of "just jump right in" is it that has you confused?

[jackfengshui]

Originally Posted by FREEATLAST

Which part of "just jump right in" is it that has you confused?

I am not confused at all. I am just amazed.

[FREEATLAST]

Originally Posted by anita germane

actually ..you should stop..and not imply what my answer would be..because sir..... u do not know me and i do not know you at least under the handle you are posting under......and if you did and personally met me..you would understand im a straight shooter...

i dont take sides..i take the info from both analyze it and come up with an unbiased opinion...I just shoot out the facts of both sides....and shoot it out there in an unbiased way.....cuz thats what a person that has no agenda's would do..

im not gonna tell ya what to do ..or tell you who to like for what ever reason or tell you who not to like for whatever reason...cuz thats what a real unbiased person would do..

That's a good non answer Anitia. I also like how you subtly imply that I might indeed be another member or provider by saying "i do not know you at least under the handle you are posting under".

Let me guess - if i were to poke around far back enough I'd probably find that you and Miss Elizabeth have butted heads in the past too, right?

Your hostile and defensive denial reeks of guilt.