Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
649 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
397 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
281 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70811 | biomed1 | 63436 | Yssup Rider | 61107 | gman44 | 53298 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48740 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 42965 | The_Waco_Kid | 37268 | CryptKicker | 37224 | Mokoa | 36496 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
06-12-2015, 01:42 PM
|
#31
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Now we all heard the money master of the state department when she testified, there was no money problem at the state department. Hillary just refused to call for more security when it was requested.
We can have more committees until we get all the information like Hillary's email, who said stand down, why wasn't the extra security provided, and why was the ambassador there on the 11th of September.
|
No one ever said stand down. That shit has been debunked for years. Stevens turned down security on several requests. He was there to hand the outpost over to the Libyans a few days later.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 01:58 PM
|
#32
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You're a cock-sucking, lib-retarded jackass, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.
In the face of evidence showing mounting threats and dangers, and evaluating that the risks weren't worth the lives of its personnel, Britain -- a major U.S. ally that shares its intel with the U.S. -- pulled its personnel out of Benghazi. U.S. Libyan assets repeatedly warned the State Department of the mounting danger, but Hildabeast's response was not to increase the security, nor did she have enough regard for Steven's life to pull him out of Benghazi before the 9/11 anniversary.
Worldwide, since 2001, U.S. installations, military and civilian, have taken a "stand-to" position of heightened security awareness on the anniversary of 9/11, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. That's called being pro-active and responsible, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.
But under Hildabeast's direction, Stevens was sent to Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11 without proper security, and then she allowed the ridiculous to happen, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. In the face of tangible, mounting threats and ignoring the pleas of U.S. personnel in Libya, the security force in Libya was fuckin' reduced! And the only hindsight, 20/20 shit-fest that has happened was propagated by Odumbo and Hildabeast who tried, but failed, to hide their shitty foreign policy behind a shitty little lie about a "video", you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.
And you'd be one of the "#Grubered" Odumbo minions that sucked the shitty lie down -- hook, line and sinker -- and then reflexively regurgitates that lie on command, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.
|
Your hatred for this administration has clouded what little logic and reason you possess. If they had abandoned Benghazi, you would accuse them of giving in to the terrorists. There is no right move they can make in your judgement. That's why I mention 20/20 hindsight. You will shit on ANY move, regardless of what it was.
"The United States no longer had the resources or the national will to commit massive military manpower to its outposts in remnants of what was once defined as the New World Order. This wasn't a political question, but a statement of reality. The fight against terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism was a brand of warfare that would not be fought with brigades and Bradley armored fighting vehicles. The footprint of the United States in this unsettled country and its ever important but dangerous second city would have to be small and agile."
"J. Christopher Stevens was the foreign-service officer who made sure that American diplomacy in Libya flourished. Chris, as he was called, was a true Arabist; he was known to sign his name on personal e-mails as “Krees” to mimic the way Arabs pronounced his name. Born in Grass Valley, California, in 1960, Chris had developed a passionate love for the Arab world while working for the Peace Corps in Morocco in the mid-1980s. Virtually all of his posts were in the Middle East and in locations that can be best described as dicey. It would be North Africa, however, where Chris Stevens would excel as a diplomat and as a reliable face of American reach. When the United States re-emerged as a political player in Libya, he jumped at the opportunity to work in this new arena for American diplomacy."
You see this as some sinister plot, but you have no proof of it. A bad decision or judgement doesn't equal some nefarious scheme. We were trying to establish a foothold in this newly-freed country. If we had cut and run, you would have a problem with that too. You would have a problem with whatever tact we took. That's the truth of the matter. And you still defend Bush, and he has far more than the blood of 4 Americans on his hands. You hypocritical cocksucker.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 04:04 PM
|
#33
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider
There is no right move they can make in your judgement.... You would have a problem with whatever tact we took. That's the truth of the matter.
|
First of all, the word is "tack" not "tact", you freelance moron. Second, when the fuck are you going to give us links to the quotes you toss out? Are you afraid to reveal your sources? Third and most important, you are WRONG. I would have heartily supported Obama if he had sent our Special Ops guys back into Libya to kill or capture the Benghazi perps. We knew who they were and where they were. We could have done it right away. It would have helped Obama politically just before the election. I would have supported it even if he was accused of wagging the dog. It would have been the "right move". Far better than using the youtube video as a phony excuse to do nothing. THAT'S the truth of the matter, dipshit.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 04:12 PM
|
#34
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 12, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 511
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider
If she's doing it for her own political ambition, why all the pretext? Why the exhibition of 'terrible' foreign policy judgement? If she's truly doing it for political reasons, wouldn't she want things to work out? She didn't send Stevens there, knowing what would happen. Of course you're the dipshit who just wants to start bombing everybody, fuck diplomacy, right? Do you ever stop to consider that foreign diplomacy is a fluid situation and not static, like your sex life? Things change, people change. When dealing with human beings, anything is possible. All you have is 20/20 hindsight. The fact that you think you could have done better makes me laugh so hard I'm pissing my pants.
That's all you and IB do. You come in after something has happened and you shit all over it. Any fucking retard can do that and you two are proof positive. I thought you were done with me anyway. You can't resist my heat, can you?
|
I finally figured it out - WR is actually Valerie Jarrett sitting in the oval office private shitter with her pants around her fat ankles and texting on her free obamaphone. No wonder WR has so much time on her hands to address our concerns....
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 04:18 PM
|
#35
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,107
|
Is "tack/tact" the best you got IBJunior?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Pissburgh pissant.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 04:26 PM
|
#36
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Is "tack/tact" the best you got IBJunior?
|
Good catch, AssUp. I forgot to add this part:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Faggot faggot gruber#gruber goober cocksucker retard.
|
Any action down at Tallywackers today, faggot?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 05:30 PM
|
#37
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 12, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 511
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider
|
"WombRaider" no reviews, lots of posts, located "down by the river"... Could it be Kermit Gosnell, the baby killer who got sent "up the river"?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 06:46 PM
|
#38
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,107
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad
Good catch, AssUp. I forgot to add this part:
Any action down at Tallywackers today, faggot?
|
Obviously it is the best you got.
Might never get to AAA, punk.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 08:07 PM
|
#39
|
Oral Aficionado
Join Date: Feb 13, 2013
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 8,522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider
Of course you're the dipshit who just wants to start bombing everybody, fuck diplomacy, right?
|
So.. anyone that wants "to start bombing everybody" is also a dipshit?
You DO realize that Obama has bombed SEVEN (count them) SEVEN different nations so far in his Admin and he still has time to add more to that count. Any guesses how many Bush bombed? Here's a hint.. significantly fewer than Obama.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/23/politi...-obama-bombed/ SO you can't whine.. "where's the proof".
So.. I guess that makes Obama a "dipshit who is more of a "War Monger" than Bush. Hmmmm? By the way... any idea why Obama won't bomb Iran to knock out their nuclear enrichment sites? And don't tell me "It would start a war". Obama has bombed SEVEN nations.. did he start 7 wars?
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 08:09 PM
|
#40
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sickpuppy
I finally figured it out - WR is actually Valerie Jarrett sitting in the oval office private shitter with her pants around her fat ankles and texting on her free obamaphone. No wonder WR has so much time on her hands to address our concerns....
|
The Obama phone had nothing to do with Obama. Quit believing every word from your republitard overlords.
http://gawker.com/5947133/the-obama-...-do-with-obama
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 08:12 PM
|
#41
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedLeg505
So.. anyone that wants "to start bombing everybody" is also a dipshit?
You DO realize that Obama has bombed SEVEN (count them) SEVEN different nations so far in his Admin and he still has time to add more to that count. Any guesses how many Bush bombed? Here's a hint.. significantly fewer than Obama.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/23/politi...-obama-bombed/ SO you can't whine.. "where's the proof".
So.. I guess that makes Obama a "dipshit who is more of a "War Monger" than Bush. Hmmmm? By the way... any idea why Obama won't bomb Iran to knock out their nuclear enrichment sites? And don't tell me "It would start a war". Obama has bombed SEVEN nations.. did he start 7 wars?
|
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact...many-muslim-c/
Still think he's a Muslim?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 08:14 PM
|
#42
|
Oral Aficionado
Join Date: Feb 13, 2013
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 8,522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider
|
Yep.. all Obama did was REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT for the "disadvantaged/poor" to prove their status before getting their free phones, like it was originally required under Bush... whoops.
http://www.freegovernmentcellphones.net/states
"In addition, you are able to qualify by your income level. Most states want to see that your total household income is at or below 135% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for your state; a smaller number of states are at 150%. Each state page we link to above will tell you in detail what those levels are"
Used to be, you had to provide the data to prove your income level to get the program. Now.. you just apply, get the phone, give no proof.
Quit regurgitating the same talking points from your DemocRAT overlords.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 08:16 PM
|
#43
|
Oral Aficionado
Join Date: Feb 13, 2013
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 8,522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider
|
So.. with all the bombing and killing.. still think he's a Christian?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 08:22 PM
|
#44
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedLeg505
So.. with all the bombing and killing.. still think he's a Christian?
|
I never thought he was... I'm on record as saying I think he's an atheist.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-12-2015, 08:24 PM
|
#45
|
Oral Aficionado
Join Date: Feb 13, 2013
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 8,522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider
I never thought he was... I'm on record as saying I think he's an atheist.
|
So Atheists are more of a War Monger than a Christian?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|