For those who wish to bid the Jewish Lawyer Adieu

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Put up or shut up chicken dick the chicken shit pussy.

Follow your own advice, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp. Until you prove otherwise, you're a liar in addition to being stupid, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Follow your own advice, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp. Until you prove otherwise, you're a liar in addition to being stupid, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp.

Chicken dick the pussy whiner walks it back one more time. If he can't prove it he blames someone else.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Chicken dick the pussy whiner walks it back one more time. If he can't prove it he blames someone else.

You're the stupid jackass that needs to produce this so called evidence that will substantiate your claim, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp. Until you do you you are both stupid and a liar, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp.

[Jewish Lawyer]

Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

why is the lawyer leaving eccie?

I'm not leaving eccie, just this ridiculous forum for a mere 5 years.
BigTex is afraid to debate me, he is a pussy.
And a faggot. (as are AssupIdiot & his other handles such as Uncle Han, and BigTex's other handle, Ekim008/Ivabiggen)
Also, he is unable to advocate very effectively, and he knows it.

[bigcockpussylicker]

Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

I'm not leaving eccie, just this ridiculous forum for a mere 5 years.
BigTex is afraid to debate me, he is a pussy.
And a faggot. (as are AssupIdiot & his other handles such as Uncle Han, and BigTex's other handle, Ekim008/Ivabiggen)
Also, he is unable to advocate very effectively, and he knows it.

thanks for the info
debate?
these threads just turn into name calling, and I can' figure anything out, so I dont think anyone reads them

[Jewish Lawyer]

Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

thanks for the info
debate?
these threads just turn into name calling, and I can' figure anything out, so I dont think anyone reads them

I believe you are correct!
It is essentially a waste of everyone's time, except for blowing off steam.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

why is the lawyer leaving eccie?

Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

BigTex is afraid to debate me

JL lost a wager, fair and square. A debate never entered into the equation and is little more than a figment of JL's over-active, childish imagination. It is an attempt on his part to deflect attention from the fact that he lost the bet. Saving face, if you will!

As for the wager itself. It actually began at Post #46, located at the following link:

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1283039&page=4

Without going into too much detail, it started off as a $500 bet. We could not agree on who would hold the money until a winner could be determined.

We finally scrapped the money wager and it evolved into a self imposed restriction from posting in the ECCIE Political Forum for a five year period. No exceptions!

The final terms and conditions were agreed upon by both JL and I and approved by an ECCIE Moderator.

One of the conditions agreed upon was that the loser would be allowed to post for a 5 day period, once the official winner was determined.

JL's 5 year restriction from the Political Forum begins at 10:08 PM, this evening.

Let me know if you have any further questions!

[i'va biggen]

Hey JL !!! Goodbye dick head.

[Guest051115]

Originally Posted by bigtex

JL lost a wager, fair and square. A debate never entered into the equation and is little more than a figment of an over-active, childish imagination. It is nothing more than an attempt on his part to deflect attention from the fact that he lost the bet.

Saving face, if you will!

As for the wager itself and without going into too much detail, it started off as a $500 bet. We could not agree on who would hold the money, until a winner could be determined.

We finally scrapped the money wager and it evolved into a self imposed exile from posting in the ECCIE Political Forum for a five year period. No exceptions!

The final terms and conditions were agreed upon by both JL and I and approved by an ECCIE Moderator.

One of the conditions agreed upon was that the loser would be entitled to post for a 5 day period, following the official winner being declared.

JL's 5 year ban from the Political Forum begins at 10:08 PM, this evening.

Let me know if you have any questions!

So you guys had a ELE bet..nice. Thanks for taking that scrotum hawk down I'm going to say all types of horrible stuff about him at 10:09 pm. Lol what a loser couldn't have happened to a better loser.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by Zanzibar789

So you guys had a ELE bet..nice. Thanks for taking that scrotum hawk down I'm going to say all types of horrible stuff about him at 10:09 pm. Lol what a loser couldn't have happened to a better loser.

Actually, I would have preferred the $500 wager but JL's 5 year restriction from posting in this forum is a very sweeeeeet consolation prize.

[Guest051115]

Originally Posted by bigtex

Actually, I would have preferred the $500 wager but JL's 5 year restriction from posting in this forum is a very sweeeeeet consolation prize.

Do you think he'll honor it?

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by Zanzibar789

Do you think he'll honor it?

The mutually agreed upon terms and conditions were spelled out by the Moderator in the following quoted post:

Originally Posted by dearhunter

Here is how it will be.

The wager is for the time period of 12/1/14 thru 1/31/15. If BigTex has an infraction (active or reversed) on ECCIE of any kind during that time period, he loses the wager. If BigTex does not have an infraction in his profile for the time period of 12/1/14 thru 1/31/15, Jewish Lawyer loses the wager.

By agreeing to the wager, BigTex and Jewish Lawyer voluntarily submit to a directive that can be enforced by the moderators of this forum and myself.

The directive of the wager shall be as follows: The loser of the wager shall not post in the ECCIE political forum (under the losers present and/or any subsequent handles) for a period of 5 years. The time will start at the posting of information settling the wager.

Settlement of the wager will be decided by me. If either party has cause to dispute my findings, simply RTM your grievance and modtardville will decide.

Here are the penalties for violating the directive:

1st violation of the directive is a 30day ban from ECCIE.

2nd violation of the directive is a 60day ban from ECCIE.

3rd violation and each subsequent violation of the directive is a 90day ban from ECCIE.

To be clear, if the loser posts in the Political Forum (even if he deletes his post immediately), it will be a violation of the directive.

The loser will be allowed a 5day 'goodbye period'. He will be allowed to whine and bitch for 5 days about how much of a loser the winner is. After that, he is done.

If you both agree to the wager, quote this post and state "I agree".

[Guest051115]

Originally Posted by bigtex

The mutually agreed upon terms and conditions were spelled out by the Moderator in the following quoted post:

All because he couldn't afford $500 lol.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by Zanzibar789

All because he couldn't afford $500 lol.

And he claims it was because I didn't want to debate him! All things considered, what joy could I possibly get after winning a debate against a mental midget?

Winning the bet was much more merciful.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're the stupid jackass that needs to produce this so called evidence that will substantiate your claim, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp. Until you do you you are both stupid and a liar, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp.

I am right till proven wrong chicken dick. Why didn't you bid your butt buddy and nut nuzzler Adieu also, or you two rooming together?