Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh > The Sandbox - Pittsburgh
test
The Sandbox - Pittsburgh The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here. If it's NOT an adult-themed topic, then it belongs here

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 279
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163231
Yssup Rider60939
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48650
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42577
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid37006
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-13-2022, 02:19 PM   #31
1pittsburgh
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2019
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,754
Encounters: 9
Default

berry, you can't even answer a simple question because the answer puts an end to this fantasy post. All you can do is keep restating people's opinions while I state quantifiable facts that easily dispute those opinions.

If Twitter censored Trump in the days leading up to the election, how was he able to tweet 65 time on November 1, 2020, and how were people able to favorite and retweet those tweets over 3 MILLION TIMES?
1pittsburgh is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 02:23 PM   #32
1pittsburgh
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2019
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,754
Encounters: 9
Default

On November 2, 2020 he tweeted 73 times and was favorited and retweeted well into the MULTIPLE MILLIONS AGAIN. How could he have more reach than almost any other Twitter user if he were censored?


You keep repeating people's nonsensical opinions, but in the face of cold hard facts, you clam up and refuse to answer the question.

Compare those days to November 2, 2017, three years earlier, in a non election year, when he tweeted 15 times and was favorited and retweeted around one million times, and it becomes clear that he actually had more reach on Twitter in the days leading up to the election. Why do you spread misinformation?
1pittsburgh is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 02:36 PM   #33
berryberry
Valued Poster
 
berryberry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 16,225
Encounters: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh View Post
berry, you can't even answer a simple question because the answer puts an end to this fantasy post. All you can do is keep restating people's opinions while I state quantifiable facts that easily dispute those opinions.
No, I am not stating people's opinions. I am stating well respected reporters conclusions after examining the facts and evidence unlike you

And you do realize don't you that Twitter activist employees, without basis, could suppress and censor the President of the United States, in the days before the 2020 election while not suppressing and censoring every single thing he tweeted.

You do understand how Twitter works, don't you? How search bans, visibility bans, etc. all work?

Because from all the misinformation you keep sharing, it is clear that you do not. Pretty sad if you ask me
berryberry is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 02:50 PM   #34
1pittsburgh
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2019
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,754
Encounters: 9
Default

I understand how twitter works well enough to see that he had MORE reach in the days leading up to the election. If he were shadow banned, he would not have been retweeted and favorited more than 3 million times a day, more than he was on the same day in a non election year. Theses are facts. Cold hard numbers. What you call "conclusions" are opinions.


Sadly it's not against the rules of the forum for you to continue to spread these lies in here, so I'll leave it at this: Reasonable people can see those factual numbers which clearly demonstrate that his reach on Twitter was not suppressed in the days leading up to the election. Saying that it was is like saying that Barry Bonds home run totals were suppressed in the year 2001, or Ben Roethlisberger's passing numbers were suppressed in 2018. The days leading up to the election were some of the most prolific days for favorites and retweets of his tweets. People need to see the tweets to be able to retweet or favorite them, so that demonstrates that he was not in fact shadow banned.
1pittsburgh is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 03:20 PM   #35
berryberry
Valued Poster
 
berryberry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 16,225
Encounters: 98
Default

Sad but expected from you.

You can keep burying your head to the truth. And you can keep on spreading your lies. The fact remains, which any fair minded intelligent person can clearly see, that:

Files show Twitter activist employees, without basis, suppressed and censored the President of the United States, in the days before the 2020 election. This is damning evidence of election interference. Several well respected reporters reviewed the evidence and reported this including a very well respected liberal reporter who has no love for President Trump.
And Elon Musk confirmed this saying "Unequivocally true. The evidence is clear and voluminous."


That is the fact, no matter what you believe or post
berryberry is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 03:27 PM   #36
1pittsburgh
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2019
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,754
Encounters: 9
Default

You can make the text as big and colorful as you like but it's still meaningless, considering the mathematical fact that his reach on twitter was as big in the days leading up to the election as it ever was.
1pittsburgh is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 03:54 PM   #37
The_Waco_Kid
AKA Admiral Waco Kid
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,006
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh View Post
I understand how twitter works well enough to see that he had MORE reach in the days leading up to the election. If he were shadow banned, he would not have been retweeted and favorited more than 3 million times a day, more than he was on the same day in a non election year. Theses are facts. Cold hard numbers. What you call "conclusions" are opinions.


The days leading up to the election were some of the most prolific days for favorites and retweets of his tweets. People need to see the tweets to be able to retweet or favorite them, so that demonstrates that he was not in fact shadow banned.

that's not how shadow banning works. shadow banning is not a total block, that would be too obvious. it limits the reach of the account. if twitter hadn't shadow banned those tweets, how many times would they have been seen/retweeted? 4 million? 5 million? 6 million? that's the point of shadow banning accounts.
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 05:39 PM   #38
1pittsburgh
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2019
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,754
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
that's not how shadow banning works. shadow banning is not a total block, that would be too obvious. it limits the reach of the account. if twitter hadn't shadow banned those tweets, how many times would they have been seen/retweeted? 4 million? 5 million? 6 million? that's the point of shadow banning accounts.
LOL No one said that he was totally blocked. If he was totally blocked he would not have been retweeted and favorited 300 times let alone 3 million. His reach on Twitter during the days leading up to the election was as great as it ever was. Greater than it was during the same dates on non election years. That's the math of the situation. Musk's bullshit lies are irrelevant. It's delusional to believe his lies when the statistics prove the exact opposite.
1pittsburgh is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 05:48 PM   #39
The_Waco_Kid
AKA Admiral Waco Kid
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,006
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh View Post
LOL No one said that he was totally blocked. If he was totally blocked he would not have been retweeted and favorited 300 times let alone 3 million. His reach on Twitter during the days leading up to the election was as great as it ever was. Greater than it was during the same dates on non election years. That's the math of the situation. Musk's bullshit lies are irrelevant. It's delusional to believe his lies when the statistics prove the exact opposite.



so internal twitter comm's showing that twitter did indeed use various tools to censor accounts are lies. interesting. what would convince you? jack dorsey admitting it? oh wait. he did!
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 05:58 PM   #40
1pittsburgh
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2019
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,754
Encounters: 9
Default

Trumps reach during that time. The statistics. I get it. Not everyone understands math well. They'd rather let someone tell them lies.
1pittsburgh is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 06:05 PM   #41
The_Waco_Kid
AKA Admiral Waco Kid
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,006
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh View Post
Trumps reach during that time. The statistics. I get it. Not everyone understands math well. They'd rather let someone tell them lies.

i have a degree in Mathematics. and Computer Science with a minor in Business Administration. hardly an "uneducated Trump supporter".

simple question


if Trump's account's "reach" was affected .. is that censorship?
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 06:08 PM   #42
1pittsburgh
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2019
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,754
Encounters: 9
Default

His reach was quantifiably as good during those days as it ever was. Reasonable people can see that they didn't censor him. No reason for me to keep going back and forth. Have a nice evening.
1pittsburgh is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 06:30 PM   #43
The_Waco_Kid
AKA Admiral Waco Kid
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,006
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh View Post
His reach was quantifiably as good during those days as it ever was. Reasonable people can see that they didn't censor him. No reason for me to keep going back and forth. Have a nice evening.

we'll never know because his was censored. can you quantify how that affected the election?
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 12-13-2022, 11:26 PM   #44
berryberry
Valued Poster
 
berryberry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 16,225
Encounters: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
so internal twitter comm's showing that twitter did indeed use various tools to censor accounts are lies. interesting. what would convince you? jack dorsey admitting it? oh wait. he did!
You are wasting your breath. Nothing will convince him.

Not Matt Taibbi, a liberal journalist who dislikes President Trump reporting it.

Not Bari Weiss and several other journalists who all had access to the data and evidence reporting it

Not Elon Musk, the new owner of Twitter who has reviewed the data and evidence reporting it

Not even Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter admitting it

Files show Twitter activist employees, without basis, suppressed and censored the President of the United States, in the days before the 2020 election. This is damning evidence of election interference. Several well respected reporters reviewed the evidence and reported this including a very well respected liberal reporter who has no love for President Trump.

Anyone who can't see and admit that reality here is deluding themselves
berryberry is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved