Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
646 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
396 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
280 |
George Spelvin |
265 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70796 | biomed1 | 63332 | Yssup Rider | 61036 | gman44 | 53297 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48678 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 42772 | CryptKicker | 37222 | The_Waco_Kid | 37138 | Mokoa | 36496 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
03-04-2015, 08:09 AM
|
#31
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway
5. They never own up to anything.[/B][/COLOR]
|
Except for dodging sniper fire on the tarmac.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 03:02 AM
|
#32
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
|
Her email server is in her house....
just like everyone else's email servers. This woman thinks she is above the law and has to respond to no one. Is this what the left wants to put in the Oval Office this time. She has been delusional for many years and she has 20+ years of retribution to pay back. Be afraid of Hillary liberals, be very afraid.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 04:15 AM
|
#33
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
just like everyone else's email servers. This woman thinks she is above the law and has to respond to no one. Is this what the left wants to put in the Oval Office this time. She has been delusional for many years and she has 20+ years of retribution to pay back. Be afraid of Hillary liberals, be very afraid.
|
She has apparently violated the same Federal Statute that Patraeus did.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/04/us...over.html?_r=0
He's pleading to a Federal "misdemeanor," but the charges are multiple counts for each classified document and/or document containing classified information that she received through her private file server, which I understand was at home.
For those who are uninformed, a Federal Misdemeanor, like many State misdemeanors, carry penalties for incarceration in a Federal facility and in this particular instance a ban from holding public office in the future, which is warranted due to her status and security level.
Yet another "Great Right Wing Conspiracy"!
The Martha Stewart of the Obaminable Administration.
BTW: There has been some suggestion in the media, and perhaps in this forum, that the "laws" pertaining to the possession and handling of classified information post-dated the position of Hillarious in the DOS, but that assertion is patently false. Various provisions of the U.S. Code applicable to the former SOS have been around for 15 years and longer.
At a minimum she would loses her security clearance, which would effectively prohibit her from holding any public office requiring a security clearance, as well as in the private sector, even if she gets probation and a fine like Patraeus.
Apparently, Hillarious, who used to practice law, seems to think that she can "cull" the emails to determine which ones violated Federal law and which ones did not. And apparently she thinks she can simply inform Federal investigators that she doesn't have any "classified documents" on her computer, and never did. Again, Martha Stewart.
Like DNA on a blue dress, another Clinton is about to be exposed to the 21st century.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 05:38 AM
|
#34
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
another Clinton is about to be exposed to the 21st century.
|
Are you saying that Jim Webb's chances for the Democratic nomination are greater today than they were yesterday.
Are you ready to hop on the Jim Webb for POTUS in 2016 bandwagon?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 06:04 AM
|
#35
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex
Are you saying that Jim Webb's chances for the Democratic nomination are greater today than they were yesterday.
NO
Are you ready to hop on the Jim Webb for POTUS in 2016 bandwagon?
NO
|
I didn't "say" anything. I posted:
Quote:
She has apparently violated the same Federal Statute that Patraeus did.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/04/us...over.html?_r=0
He's pleading to a Federal "misdemeanor," but the charges are multiple counts for each classified document and/or document containing classified information that she received through her private file server, which I understand was at home.
For those who are uninformed, a Federal Misdemeanor, like many State misdemeanors, carry penalties for incarceration in a Federal facility and in this particular instance a ban from holding public office in the future, which is warranted due to her status and security level.
Yet another "Great Right Wing Conspiracy"!
The Martha Stewart of the Obaminable Administration.
BTW: There has been some suggestion in the media, and perhaps in this forum, that the "laws" pertaining to the possession and handling of classified information post-dated the position of Hillarious in the DOS, but that assertion is patently false. Various provisions of the U.S. Code applicable to the former SOS have been around for 15 years and longer.
At a minimum she would loses her security clearance, which would effectively prohibit her from holding any public office requiring a security clearance, as well as in the private sector, even if she gets probation and a fine like Patraeus.
Apparently, Hillarious, who used to practice law, seems to think that she can "cull" the emails to determine which ones violated Federal law and which ones did not. And apparently she thinks she can simply inform Federal investigators that she doesn't have any "classified documents" on her computer, and never did. Again, Martha Stewart.
Like DNA on a blue dress, another Clinton is about to be exposed to the 21st century.
|
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 06:08 AM
|
#36
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
I didn't "say" anything.
|
No surprise there! LLIdiot never has "anything" meaningful to "say."
Carry on!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 07:07 AM
|
#37
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex
Are you saying that Jim Webb's chances for the Democratic nomination are greater today than they were yesterday.
Are you ready to hop on the Jim Webb for POTUS in 2016 bandwagon?
|
They sure aren't any worse.
From what I have been seeing on Cable News, especially CNN and MSNBC, the Liberal/Progressive Left is starting to take note that the Clintons are the money grubbing, lying sacks of shit that most have suspected, or have known, for years.
Bill Clinton made his bones on one issue......."it's the economy, stupid".
His own Party is beginning to realize that's not going to let them skate by any more.
The perfect storm would be that just about the time some enterprising hacker finds all of Hillary's EMails, they also find videos of Bill with a cigar stuck up some girls twat on Jeffrey Epstein's Island..
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 09:10 AM
|
#38
|
2016 County by County Map
Join Date: Dec 13, 2009
Location: There now. Not here.
Posts: 4,378
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 09:44 AM
|
#39
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S
..... they also find videos of Bill with a cigar stuck up some girls twat on Jeffrey Epstein's Island..
|
Hopefully it won't be a Cuban cigar, because ....
..... that would refocus the "re-imaging" of Cuba in a negative direction.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 09:47 AM
|
#40
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 29, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
just like everyone else's email servers. This woman thinks she is above the law and has to respond to no one. Is this what the left wants to put in the Oval Office this time. She has been delusional for many years and she has 20+ years of retribution to pay back. Be afraid of Hillary liberals, be very afraid.
|
It was a private secure server. Nice try though dum dum
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 09:54 AM
|
#41
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
It was a private secure server. Nice try though dum dum
|
I hate to break it to you,
...but after you explain what a "private secure server" is, I will give you ROS.
Here's the "tip of the iceberg"!
http://www.pcworld.com/article/20469...nd-secure.html
"NSA-dodging mail service explains why email can never truly be private and secure"
But that begs the question (or actually ignores it) ... the "question" is ...
.. has she violated any one or more of the Federal statutes that prohibit her from receiving and/or possessing classified information on a private computer system.... NOT whether it is secure or not.
Title 50 and the various criminal provisions under Title 18 that have begun to address the communications issues of the 21st century have been around for awhile and they are inviolate in order to maintain one's clearance status. You don't talk shit, share shit, or receive shit outside of the Federal system in which such information may pass.
You have to remember Hillarious "stored" evidence in a criminal investigation in her closet in shoe boxes for months before "finding" them ... after they were subpoenaed six months before she "found" them. They were not her checks.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 10:18 AM
|
#42
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 29, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
I hate to break it to you,
...but after you explain what a "private secure server" is, I will give you ROS.
Here's the "tip of the iceberg"!
http://www.pcworld.com/article/20469...nd-secure.html
"NSA-dodging mail service explains why email can never truly be private and secure"
But that begs the question (or actually ignores it) ... the "question" is ...
.. has she violated any one or more of the Federal statutes that prohibit her from receiving and/or possessing classified information on a private computer system.... NOT whether it is secure or not.
Title 50 and the various criminal provisions under Title 18 that have begun to address the communications issues of the 21st century have been around for awhile and they are inviolate in order to maintain one's clearance status. You don't talk shit, share shit, or receive shit outside of the Federal system in which such information may pass.
You have to remember Hillarious "stored" evidence in a criminal investigation in her closet in shoe boxes for months before "finding" them ... after they were subpoenaed six months before she "found" them. They were not her checks.
|
You ain't breaking shit but bricks, wet nips. To intimate that what she was using is like everyone else's email servers, is dishonest. And there are exceptions to the law you cite, in the case of classified or sensitive information.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 10:22 AM
|
#43
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
...And there are exceptions to the law you cite, in the case of classified or sensitive information.
|
cite them by statute number.
Go back to your Reader's Digest and CNN pundits.
Explain how you KNOW she had a "secure private server"?
Explain how they got to her "secure private server"?
Scotty beamed them?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 10:32 AM
|
#44
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 29, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
cite them by statute number.
Go back to your Reader's Digest and CNN pundits.
Explain how you KNOW she had a "secure private server"?
Explain how they got to her "secure private server"?
Scotty beamed them?
|
Go find it yourself. I read it an article yesterday and I'm not bothering to go look for it just to please you. How who got to her server? You golem fucktard minion.###
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2015, 10:35 AM
|
#45
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
Go find it yourself. I read it an article yesterday and I'm not bothering to go look for it just to please you. How who got to her server? You golem fucktard minion.###
|
UC, only give LLIdiot the attention he so justly deserves.
None! Zero! Nada! Zilch!
That should just about cover all the bases.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|