moving in with clients

[Worldtravler]

Originally Posted by Kinky Boy

I bet the males lives who the providers moved in with improved 100 percent. Fuck all day. Eat Twat all night.

Maybe some people think that way.

Me personally, if I had a provider moving in it wouldn't just be about sex. There's more in a relationship than just sex.

[Alana kay]

Originally Posted by tornado82

Providers, if a client paid you enough, would you move in with him?

Ahhh HELL noo. LOL

[Naomi4u]

Oh the trainwreck that would ensue...

[DocHolyday]

Okay boys and girls, all together now. Repeat after me...TRAIN WRECK!!!!! Ladies, gentlemen, today's lesson is complete. Class dismissed.

[1blackman1]

Can't turn a ho (paid or not) to a housewife.

[BSer]

I would never "pay" for someone to live with me. And if "pay" was the basis of a client and a provider shacking up its not going to go well or end well.

I have had numerous relationships with providers even lived with a few. Those relationships went well the way of any normal relationship cause the basis wasn't on someone getting paid.

[kellie_love]

well said anita!

[PsychedelicMut]

Originally Posted by SA Angel

Ehhh....depends on the client. I'm a little more lax if I'm allowed free reign when he's not there. Without exclusivity staying in a home that he would be in 50-75% of the time is very doable and could be fun. Just keeping my finger in the hobby pie for variety every once in while since I obviously would have all my other needs and wants taken care of.

If it was exclusive and we were together all the time? I think that's called "retired" and I'd expect a legally, religiously, and socially binding contract aka. a MRS. I'd also have to commit hooker sin number one and fall in love with a client....so very unlikely.

I'm surprised any provider would say yes at all. How much is "enough?" I assume that getting married wouldn't have a starting price.

[berkleigh]

I dunno how his wife would feel about it, but sure!

My ATF wouldn't have to pay me to move in with him.
If I am moving in, it's about a relationship and not his money.

Anyone else, that is a different story and where an arrangement/boundaries would be discussed.
Considering the fact I have a live-in Nanny,one grown child away at College and one school aged child still at home, I would NOT allow some "random" client around my family. Ever. Not appropriate. End of Story.

There would have to be an established friendship outside of the Hobby and I can count on a few fingers who those Gentlemen are in my Life.

I happen to enjoy my privacy and time to myself. I personally am not at the moment in my life where I want to live with a man again. Been there. Done that. Have the T-shirt and the Trophy PLUS the Divorce Papers!

So to answer the question, Not Interested.

[Tony Gambino]

Originally Posted by Eva Damita

Nope. We'd have to work an arrangement out where I get my own place, and depending on costs, make it up with engagements or overnights. Just how I conduct things. Ibhate "owing" or "earning my keep". I stopped that at my parents' house back in HS in '08.

HOLY FUCK.......you were in HS in 2008?? uggg im really getting old......

[Eva Damita]

Originally Posted by Tony Gambino

HOLY FUCK.......you were in HS in 2008?? uggg im really getting old......

Yes Sir!

Graduated Frisco HS (Go Raccoons)!

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by BSer

I would never "pay" for someone to live with me. And if "pay" was the basis of a client and a provider shacking up its not going to go well or end well.

I have had numerous relationships with providers even lived with a few. Those relationships went well the way of any normal relationship cause the basis wasn't on someone getting paid.

Exactly.

[ChloeClark]

Originally Posted by xJTxSOA

"A woman who can be bought, isn't worth having." -Wilson Fisk

I could say the same about a man that pays for it....

[Mccaffery]

TBH, every relationship is purchased.
If marrriage was not a purchased proposal, there would never be a financial split after divorce.
Some of us pay providers because its more convienent that way.
There are a few women I have seen that I would love to be in a relationship with. Over time feelings occur.
Every provider that does this is not a "Ho". They provide a service that we need, and we pay for that service.

I could just as easily pick up a drunk chick from the bar, take advantage of her, and never see them again.
This hobby allows me to pick up the attractive lady, take advantage of her, and give her the beer money instead of the bartender.

[PsychedelicMut]

Originally Posted by xJTxSOA

"A woman who can be bought, isn't worth having." -Wilson Fisk

Right, but no one that can be bought is worth having.

Selling a service is not being bought.

Originally Posted by Old-T

"A guy who has to buy isn't worth having" Corollary.

"Say it ain't so." Old-T "Say it ain't so."

We gotta both be worth having or at least worth having "it".

Originally Posted by MaxiMilyen

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the topic "moving in with clients"? I guess it could mean supporting skinny pretty ladies you would lie to and don't want any responsibility for. LOL My comprehension skills just ain't what they used to be, I guess. hmmmm

MaxiMilyan, poor DSK. Registered as a client, but must actually be a closet provider looking for a skinny girl client that he would move in with.