Susan Rice to Serve as Obama’s National Security Advisor

[CJOHN]

Originally Posted by CJ7

considering all the bs he's put up with, can you blame him?

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

If she were that smart she wouldn't have gone on national tv blaming a video.

FYI, The original talking points of the CIA had "the attack on Benghazi evolved from a demonstration in Cairo, Egypt". The state department changed the location and gave that to Rice to go on the talk shows with. Do you want to fire the CIA? That was their original analysis. All you have is republicans trying to generate scandal.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

FYI, The original talking points of the CIA had "the attack on Benghazi evolved from a demonstration in Cairo, Egypt". The state department changed the location and gave that to Rice to go on the talk shows with. Do you want to fire the CIA? That was their original analysis. All you have is republicans trying to generate scandal.

There is nothing these Idiots love more than a good old fashioned conspiracy theory. Hell, we have a dozen or so Jerry Fletchers right here in this forum! You can count Turdyfly among them.

[Yssup Rider]

CIRCLE JERK!

Good thing another 4,000 innocent children weren't murdered by President OBlackula!

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by Uncle Han

Susan Rice as national security advisor!!! You Americans are safer now!!! LOL! LOL! LOL!

Uncle Han, there were several attacks on American Embassy's during the the time that Candy Rice was in charge.

[CuteOldGuy]

Uh, that's Condi Rice, and no ambassadors were killed, and as far as I know, President Bush did not ignore the attacks to prepare for a campaign fundraiser, nor did he lie about the reason for the attacks.

Not that I am supporting Bush in any way, shape or fashion. He should be on trial for war crimes. But I wanted to set the record straight.

And besides, didn't we elect Obama because he was different from Bush? Why is it ok if he behaves like Bush? Is Bush the standard we are to expect from our Presidents? I hope not.

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

FYI, The original talking points of the CIA had "the attack on Benghazi evolved from a demonstration in Cairo, Egypt". The state department changed the location and gave that to Rice to go on the talk shows with. Do you want to fire the CIA? That was their original analysis. All you have is republicans trying to generate scandal.

Hardly. Susan Rice was sent out to sell fake talking points. She should have been smart enough to not to fall for it. She deserves to be thrown under the bus. If Obama wants to surround himself with loyal sycophants go ahead - it only makes his administration look more incompetent.

It was apparent to everyone but to the Obamabots that it was a terrorist attack by 9/12. She went on the talk shows a several days later.

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

Uncle Han, there were several attacks on American Embassy's during the the time that Candy Rice was in charge.

flghtr65, do yourself a favor a see what Susan Rice's position was when the US embassies in Africa were bombed and how she 'prepared' for them and how she 'reacted' to them.

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

.

It was apparent to everyone but to the Obamabots that it was a terrorist attack by 9/12. She went on the talk shows a several days later.

Apparent to everyone except the CIA. One more time just for you, the original CIA talking points had "the attack evolved from a demonstration in Cairo, Egypt). You might as well throw the CIA under the bus that was there original analysis. The CIA did not have the word Terror in their original talking points. The state department change a couple of things and then sent her on TV. If you want to throw someone under the bus then throw the CIA under the bus.

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Uh, that's Condi Rice, and no ambassadors were killed, and as far as I know, President Bush did not ignore the attacks to prepare for a campaign fundraiser, nor did he lie about the reason for the attacks.

Not that I am supporting Bush in any way, shape or fashion. He should be on trial for war crimes. But I wanted to set the record straight.

And besides, didn't we elect Obama because he was different from Bush? Why is it ok if he behaves like Bush? Is Bush the standard we are to expect from our Presidents? I hope not.

Embassy's were attacked and people died under Candy's watch. There were 3 congressional hearings, nothing evolved from them. Benghazi was an example of poor intelligence, just like Bush with the WMD's. Sec of Defense, Leon Panatta did not sent the jet fighter because he did not think it would get there in time. A former ambassador and general did an investigation, there was no cover up. Both parties can have trouble with poor intelligence.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

Apparent to everyone except the CIA.

How do you know what the CIA thought?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

Sec of Defense, Leon Panatta did not sent the jet fighter because he did not think it would get there in time.

How do you know what Panatta thought?

[Uncle Han]

Apparently this guy got shit for brains. This flighty turd does not read. The original CIA talking points were correct and 12 revisions were done to them by Odumbo's pinkos.

Libtards don't read or think. They only feel and they mostly feel hate.

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

How do you know what the CIA thought?

The talking points were released to the press.

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

How do you know what Panatta thought?

Panatta testified before congress. If you missed it during the day, catch it on C-SPAN at night on your local cable system.