Trayvon Obama??

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by Sickpuppy

There you go again CJ7 … invoke the classic Obama formula, simply attack the competition party if you can’t offer a record of solutions. I’ll make you a bet; I’ll bet my vote in the next election if you can reasonably support your position - name 3 promises he kept resulting in 3 ways we are better off since he was elected/reelected. That is, without trying to use your perceived failings of any other party. You must stick to 3 successes under his watch that a majority of Americans would likely agree with. I’ll give you 1, getting out of Afghanistan is overdue – better late than never (but that would probably have happened under any pres). And you can’t claim “he would have but the republicans control the house” (since they didn’t during his first term). Now name 2 more successes that were good for America, not just his constituents. Last chance to make your case…..

ok, heres 2 better off's

Jobs ... slow growth indeed but considerably higher than the 4Million shed before he was elected.

Housing ... still slow due to some geographical anchors, but steadily growing as a whole across the country

[Sickpuppy]

OK CJ. Number 2 was continuing drone strikes. My number 3 would be his endorsing Hillary's stint as secretary; that is, maybe his legacy will sink her chances. Can't wait to see the repub's "Who do want to answer the 3am phone call?" commercial with her in front of the burned out Benghazi outpost.. To be continued....

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CJ7

standard approach when you've run out of wiggle room on a topic ... shift credibility/intelligence away from yourself and withdraw immediately

On the topic of your limited intellect there isn't much "wiggle room" ... it is severely limited.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by Sickpuppy

OK CJ. Number 2 was continuing drone strikes. My number 3 would be his endorsing Hillary's stint as secretary; that is, maybe his legacy will sink her chances. Can't wait to see the repub's "Who do want to answer the 3am phone call?" commercial with her in front of the burned out Benghazi outpost.. To be continued....

and I was under the impression you were talking about ISSUES not talking points ... should have known

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CJ7

standard approach when you've run out of wiggle room .....

When it comes to your intellect there isn't any "wiggle room" .. it is severely limited. Period.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

On the topic of your limited intellect there isn't much "wiggle room" ... it is severely limited.

limited intellect ? from the "avator" boy himself
... tsk tsk

[Sickpuppy]

Uh, sorry CJ, both highly debatable. Dems pushing of gov't loans to the unqualified killed the housing market. And, using taxpayer stimulus to prop up cities to maintain jobs for the police, fire and teacher union members (who vote only dem, therefore only helping constituents) along with the major shift to underemployed, but still counting them as employed, doesn't cut it. My vote is still in play.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by Sickpuppy

Uh, sorry CJ, both highly debatable. Dems pushing of gov't loans to the unqualified killed the housing market. And, using taxpayer stimulus to prop up cities to maintain jobs for the police, fire and teacher union members (who vote only dem, therefore only helping constituents) along with the major shift to underemployed, but still counting them as employed, doesn't cut it. My vote is still in play.

there YOU go ... thought we weren't talking about attacking the competition, especially since you're on entirely the wrong track about FAULT .. which I can prove btw ..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkAtUq0OJ68

.. who was it that had control, of Congress when that request was made?

back on track ISSUES that voters demand, not talking points

go

need some help? ( from Rasmussen)


Economy
77%
Health care
73%
Job creation
68%
Social Security
68%
Gov. spending
67%
Gov. ethics and corruption
64%
Taxes
62%
Education
59%
National Security
54%
Immigration
51%
Energy
50%
Small business
49%
Gun control
47%
Environment
36%
War in Afghanistan
34%

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by Sickpuppy

I give up, you just don't get it and you're overmatched. I'll move on to someone who can carry on a reasonable thoughtful debate based on the issues and not resort to the lib's last resort when losing an argument, name calling.

guess I was overmatched

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by CJ7

myself along with several other conservative minded voters,

Are you fucking kidding me?



Now THAT'S funny!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CJ7

limited intellect ? from the "avator" boy himself
... tsk tsk

Still judging intellectual capacity by typos, are you? For you that could be devastating!

We've been through this before, child. It's not a "game" you win. But if you must again. We shall.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CJ7

ok, heres 2 better off's

Jobs ... slow growth indeed but considerably higher than the 4Million shed before he was elected.

Housing ... still slow due to some geographical anchors, but steadily growing as a whole across the country

It's "here's" ...not "heres".....

...... and there is a comma between "indeed" and "but" ...

There is no ending punctuation on the first line, and the other two lines aren't complete sentences.

You are intellectually devoid and a basic dumb-ass. Your standards, child.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CJ7

guess I was overmatched

Sentences begin with a capitalized word and end with some sort of punctuation instead of those goofy, childish "Smilies."

You are intellectually devoid and a basic dumb-ass. Your standards, child.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Are you fucking kidding me?

No, he is not, but ...

.... he IS intellectually devoid and a basic dumb-ass. His childish standards.

Actually, he's a grade-schooler playing on a varsity field.

And he's not even an accomplished grade-schooler. Petty is a good label for him.

A petty, intellectually devoid, dumb-ass is what he is, and will always be into the foreseeable future.

[Sickpuppy]

Sorry for the delayed response, I have a life outside Eccie and can't maintain a 9000+ posting rate. If you can't stay on topic CJ and avoid churlish behavior, I'm going to have to give up trying to convert you to reality. So, exactly how did BHO personally steer us into a better jobs market and improving housing situation, in your learned opinion?

BTW, here's a video you might enjoy. Its 13 minutes long so grab another Red Bull.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hhJ...6&noredirect=1