Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Guest100613 · 02-20-2013, 07:44 AM

I'm having a hard time understanding why it matters so much to you if she does... She's no longer here, the proverbial dust in the wind. This thread only makes sense as a potential heads up - as she is not in Houston, all speculation is irrelevant.

Eccie Addict · 02-20-2013, 08:11 AM

What if it isn't speculation?

Guest050715-1 · 02-20-2013, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theCFE

I'm having a hard time understanding why it matters so much to you if she does... She's no longer here, the proverbial dust in the wind. This thread only makes sense as a potential heads up - as she is not in Houston, all speculation is irrelevant.

The relevance is Fo'Realz likes to say shitty things about people for no reason and then just say, "I was keepin' it fo real.". Bullshit. He's a petty little man with cuckhold horns. I'll bet he has his trick name on his car.

Fo'Realz, I don't know how to add one of her tummy shots or I would. Her pics don't look like she has them. SHE isn't the point. You being a bitch for no reason is! We've been at this for three days. Are you going to put up or shut up. Doesn't see your boyz wanna hi-five you on this one. Good luck little man. Seriously, good luck.

Guest050715-1 · 02-20-2013, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eccie Addict

What if it isn't speculation?

From her photos you can tell? Or are you just chiming in?

Eccie Addict · 02-20-2013, 08:39 AM

Just chiming in.

Guest041413-2 · 02-20-2013, 08:39 AM

This is Cock-Blocking at it's WORST. And, fwiw, the reason no one else is jumping in on this is because they WON'T. This woman by her pics alone looks perfect. Her reviews have described her as "PERFECTION INCARNATE". It's obvious WE want her back. Because of this thread, she is definitely on the radar.

He wants it all to himself. Isn't having Ms. Valerie enough? Damn straight it is. She is a dream all by herself. But, no, someone has to Cock-Block at it's very WORST! Didn't work dude...She's on my extremely short list of 'Must Haves'. Thanks y'all for the battle which brought this fine specimen of a Woman to my radar!!!

(And, I'm NEVER wrong about this when it comes to Perfection like this. Never!)

Carry-on...

Guest050715-1 · 02-20-2013, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eccie Addict

Just chiming in.

Surprised it's not a month from now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mijo(BFE)

This is Cock-Blocking at it's WORST. And, fwiw, the reason no one else is jumping in on this is because they WON'T. This woman by her pics alone looks perfect. Her reviews have described her as "PERFECTION INCARNATE". It's obvious WE want her back. Because of this thread, she is definitely on the radar.

(And, I'm NEVER wrong about this when it comes to Perfection like this. Never!)

Carry-on...

And there you have it

. Personally I think Fo'Realz has mommy issues, but your explanation works too. She does fit his "type". I still say he wanted to see her and because of his ugly disposition or whatever, she turned him down. I wouldn't see him. I know Fo'Realz, bla, bla you wouldn't see me bla, bla either. Feeling's mutual on your looks alone even.

Eccie Addict · 02-20-2013, 08:53 AM

Guest050715-1 · 02-20-2013, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eccie Addict

Yes, this is as clever as heh. But he's your sugar baby daddy; defend - or whatever this is called - him as you see fit papi.

Eccie Addict · 02-20-2013, 09:06 AM

See it however you like. Makes no difference to me sweetheart.

Personally I think her pics look great. But I'm not in any way experienced at telling whether or not a pic has been photoshopped or anything.

rockerrick · 02-20-2013, 09:07 AM

This one ?

Guest050715-1 · 02-20-2013, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eccie Addict

See it however you like. Makes no difference to me sweetheart.

Personally I think her pics look great. But I'm not in any way experienced at telling whether or not a pic has been photoshopped or anything.

Then why chime in with the what-if-it's-not-speculation bullshit? Were you implying you'd seen her and you could refute her other photos that obviously have not been photoshopped?

Anyway, thanks RR! Full frontal view - looks hot to me. But I'm not a bitter, thumb-sucking mommy-hatter that got turned down. Oh well.

Wakeup · 02-20-2013, 01:06 PM

I just gets better and better...

Some of you are aware that my original premise is that she has photoshopped her pictures to REMOVE the stretch marks right? So you won't see them in her pictures right? Just askin'...

Guest050715-1 · 02-20-2013, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wakeuр

I just gets better and better...

Some of you are aware that my original premise is that she has photoshopped her pictures to REMOVE the stretch marks right? So you won't see them in her pictures right? Just askin'...

Keep diggin' Fo'Realz, maybe you'll reach China one day. Premise? (Is the thread where you get to practice your big words that begin with P? At least you used this in a proper context.) No, you don't / didn't have a premise. You had a nasty little comment directed towards a woman that in all likelihood turned your down. Go get some evidence other than your tired, boring shit about how badly you hate women because they are scarey, and then we'll have a conversation. Until then, you got what you usually have - nuttin'. And Honey bunches, lame. Lame. You might as well have said, "Ya, well fuck you bitches!" because it carries the same weight as the bullshit you're trying to peddle. Go ahead, get the last word. And a last word with no evidence to the contrary I might add. And grow the fuck up would you.

Jusanotherdude · 02-20-2013, 02:13 PM

Wow.....just Wow on this whole thread..... let me just say Verified take on all of this is spot fucking on! As cold and calloused as it may seem providers, to a great extent, are a commodity... and as consumers we have a right to bitch about the lack of truth in advertising .... afterall That's what this board is for.... voicing of opinions and exchanging information....

Most reviews in regards to actual, unbiased, and candid depiction of physical are inaccurate at best on most regards. Not often do you see "saggy boobs", "stretch marks", "jacked up teeth", etc on a Yes review.... being able to disassociate the raw physical appearance from the glowing experience is often difficult for most. So going based on that alone is not a great idea, and certain reviewers have never met or had a session with an imperfect provider.... right mijo? Lol.