provider screening

[hensonbedges]

Originally Posted by Dzaddy_D

Ummm. As if every provider has a directory of hookers and their contacts.

Thats why she needs the contact info to verify u didnt make up the references.

Thats like giving 2 references on a employment application and refusing to provide the contact info. As if the employer is suppose to already have their info to verify the references are legit.

I kinda feel like they do though. I mean there was this one girl I knew before she was an escort and made some bad choices, and then i saw for like 3 years she was posting with some local popular girls. Did not look like a good situation. 2-3 years go by, she randomly adds me on facebook, I don't mention knowing anything, shes now in NA and found religion or something. I look through her facebook friends list..still a lot of girls I see ads of in rotations.

Long story, sorry, but I wouldn't be surprised if they have their own facebook groups for stuff. Which is silly in and of itself to have on facebook. Still so many always ask "Are you affiliated with law enforcement" when you call or text, like that ever save anybody.

[pillowlips]

I have never had a problem with screening until now. I usually walk away if they want to much info and find someone else. I was just curious why they ask for some of the information.

[Guest021121]

Originally Posted by pillowlips

I have never had a problem with screening until now. I usually walk away if they want to much info and find someone else. I was just curious why they ask for some of the information.

If they ask for personal info, I ask for theirs.....usually silence after that, or a snarky comment

[xxxalyssaxxx]

Originally Posted by pillowlips

Some of these providers have no common sense when it comes to screening. I can not figure out why some ask for so much info. I have sent PM's to one on Twitter and on here plus given the names of 2 providers. She is also a local provider.
Sorry to all of you providers that do have common sense.
I refuse to work that hard for 30 minutes of possible fun.

Originally Posted by pillowlips

I guess I need a provider to answer. I sent a text to a local provider to see for the first time. I supply my email , eccie handle , twitter info and 2 references from well reviewed and local providers. I was told that she also needed contact info for the two providers. I would not give it to her because I feel that she should have this info. If she does not have it, how does she know that I did not make it up.

Originally Posted by pillowlips

I guess you are all missing my point. Why would a hooker trust me for the correct contact info. If I am looking for trouble then I could make it up and give her the wrong info. I could have her call my any girl or cop girl. Am I the dumbass or is the hooker who requested it and some of the members on here.
Why would I give a hooker another hookers info when its usually not listed anywhere other than an email.
My opinion is that she is a dumb ass hooker who has no clue how to screen.
I definitely understand when they ask for a pm from eccie or if they are visiting. This provider was not and should of had the contact info already if she knew what she was doing.

Perhaps you were just too much work for her for a possible 30 minutes. Asking you to verify that your reference is in-fact verifiable with a website and reviews, and best contact information for your reference, and what information that reference would recognize you by is not unreasonable in my opinion.

[woodywouldpekher]

In my 8 1/2 years here I have provided an actual reference one time. Any other times I simply have said my board presence is my only reference. I have never been denied a meeting when saying that.

[xxxalyssaxxx]

Originally Posted by woodywouldpekher

In my 8 1/2 years here I have provided an actual reference one time. Any other times I simply have said my board presence is my only reference. I have never been denied a meeting when saying that.

I personally do accept a strong board presence as a means of screening especially if someone has many reviews but not all ladies do.

I will also make the observation that from a quick scan of your posts that you don't go around arbitrarily referring to ladies that you seek to spend time with dumb ass hookers either. I'd imagine that helps as well.

[Dzaddy_D]

Originally Posted by xxxalyssaxxx

I will also make the observation that from a quick scan of your posts that you don't go around arbitrarily referring to ladies that you seek to spend time with dumb ass hookers either. I'd imagine that helps as well.

Hey. Theres nothing wrong with calling a hooker, a hooker.

[xxxalyssaxxx]

Originally Posted by Dzaddy_D

Hey. Theres nothing wrong with calling a hooker, a hooker.

I don't disagree but context and connotation goes a long way when doing so.

[Dzaddy_D]

Originally Posted by xxxalyssaxxx

I don't disagree but context and connotation goes a long way when doing so.

Agreed. The term has evolved from its primary meaning. You seem to be an intelligent hooker i might say.

[Guest072323]

Originally Posted by Dzaddy_D

Agreed. The term has evolved from its primary meaning. You seem to be an intelligent hooker i might say.

So you are saying most are not. Got it.

[Next Best Thing]

ladies lol.

[Next Best Thing]

Originally Posted by Paulie Rockstar

So you are saying most are not. Got it.

Most are not.

Overwhelmingly.

I'm saying it.

[jokacz]

Rocket Surgeons

[Dzaddy_D]

Originally Posted by Paulie Rockstar

So you are saying most are not. Got it.

Not at all. You may have misinterpreted my statement.
The lovely lady mentioned the use of hookers in a derogatory manner saying "dumb ass hookers"

Originally Posted by xxxalyssaxxx

I will also make the observation that from a quick scan of your posts that you don't go around arbitrarily referring to ladies that you seek to spend time with dumb ass hookers either.

I countered using complimentary usage of hooker. I understand that there are intelligent as well as senseless hookers, and ive had the pleasure to experience both.

[Next Best Thing]

Intelligent is a subject term I guess.