I've hobbied since 1986. I know sometimes girls fudge a little with their images. I know bad service can be part of the game. Like any long-term hobbyist, I've sometimes felt like I didn't get value for my hobby dollar. But when a provider uses images that grossly distort her appearance, lies about the services she provides, gives me and my sugar baby terrible service, keeps $500.00 of my money, then posts a nonsensical tirade full of lies about me, I think that's beyond the pale of conduct we expect in our little community.
My natural reaction when I heard about this thread was to just ignore it. One reason I don't hobby much anymore is the drama associated with the review boards. Any person with a computer (or even the person's non-member friend, we've learned) can post whatever crap they want with no basis in fact and the cockroaches will come out of the woodwork to express opinions about things they know absolutely nothing about. This thread is Exhibit 'A' to this phenomenon.
It should go without saying that there isn't a shred of truth in what Brooke Cumsalot has written about my conduct during a session with her yesterday. I've written a comprehensive review of the session which should speak for itself. It's posted here:
"Review: Brooke Cumsalot: By far the worst session I've ever had!," by ShysterJon
While I don't want to glorify this trash with a response, I will reply to particular charges Brooke makes against me:
1.
I paid a discounted rate:
TOTALLY FALSE! I never asked for a discount. I paid the exact amount Brooke quoted -- $500.00. In fact, at lunch, when Brooke offered to pay her part of a $100.00 lunch bill, I said no and paid myself. At the end of the session, when Brooke screamed at me to "Take my money and leave," I asked for a refund, which Brooke refused. I think Brooke came out way ahead in our encounter.
2.
My sugar baby talked trash about me:
TOTALLY FALSE! When I told my SB what Brooke wrote, she laughed, and said she must be crazy. I concur.
3.
I demanded unknown "things" from Brooke:
TOTALLY FALSE! I guess the implication is that I demanded Brooke perform acts off the menu. I never did, and I barely had any contact with her because I didn't find her attractive. Neither did my SB.
4.
I bruised her: Of course, at first "her friend" claimed I bruised her, then Brooke changed her story and said she hit her head when I "jumped" off the bed. To be honest, I don't know if Brooke hit her head. If she did, it might help explain her bizarre behavior. I just know that, at 51 years old, I haven't jumped out of a bed in at least 10 years.
5.
I "degraded" Brooke and called her names:
TOTALLY FALSE! When it became all too apparent that the session was going nowhere, I got up from the bed and said I was going to take a shower. Brooke followed me into the bathroom and began screaming at me that I couldn't take a shower, my SB and I had to leave immediately, and she was going to call the police. My SB started crying. We put our clothes on and quickly began to pack up to leave. Three or four times, Brooke used the phone to make what sounded like a call to either the police or hotel security. She said, "There's a man in my room who won't leave!" (Of course, I was trying to get the hell out of there as fast as I could.) For the three or four minutes it took us to pack up our stuff and split, Brooke shouted at us, things like, "I hated having your wrinkled old dick in my mouth!" and "How can you fuck such a disgusting old asshole, Kelli?" Charming.
6.
I threatened to "ruin" Brooke with a terrible review:
TOTALLY FALSE! However, during her crazy rant, I told her to keep talking because everything she said I was going to put in a review. And I did.
I'm not a mindreader, so I don't know what caused Brooke to act the way she did. However, I suspect the unusual situation pricked what appears to be an enormous ego. I'll admit, over the years I've developed a certain threshhold for being interested in a woman sexually. I can't bang some chick just because she has a vagina. I've got to find something about her that attracts me. With my SB, that's no problem. With Brooke, it was a problem. With the two of them together, it was a huge problem for me to want to even touch Brooke. I can see how a girl like Brooke, who's used to being the "belle of the ball," might have her fragile ego bruised when she's around a far prettier girl.
Also, Brooke and I had prior dealings that presumably created some buried resentment in her. I think the first time Brooke and I made contact months ago was when she sent me a message here asking if I was interested in being her sugar daddy. She told me she'd had a SD who was also a hobbyist and she was unhappy in the relationship. I told her I'd only consider a provider as a SB if she quit providing. Our discussions never developed beyond a little back and forth. A few weeks ago, I wrote her on a SD-SB web site where she has a profile, we basically went over the same ground again, and we never got anywhere.
In addition, there might have been circumstances I am unaware of which might have caused Brooke's extremely odd behavior, such as something she had ingested.
My review is a completely truthful account of what occurred during my experience with Brooke, and unless somebody was hiding under the bed, the only people who know what occurred are the three of us that were in that room. Before a member begins speculating out their ass or making judgments, maybe they should think one day THEY might be the target of an attack of lies.
I'm sorry that Brooke may be experiencing some problems. People in the community who know me well are aware that I experienced some hobby-related problems a few years back. Members of the community reached out to me to help, and for that I'll always be grateful.
But the fact that someone is having problems doesn't justify the vindictive and completely baseless attempt Brooke made to tarnish my reputation in the community.
