Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Anybody think LL will address the issue of felons permanently losing their right to vote, yet squealing like a stuck hog when I suggested that they should lose their right to reproduce? Anybody see any hypocrisy there? Are you for felons that have paid their debt to society never being able to vote again?
|
That has so much shit in it sorting out the various lumps is challenging ..
.... if not a waste of time.
What does voting have to do with a 15-year-old being able to get sterilized without any parental supervision or input ....?
You create these questions, then turn around and suggest that someone has already answered them, so then you pose a debate or make some ignorant statement like:
"...yet squealing like a stuck hog when I suggested that they should lose their right to reproduce? Anybody see any hypocrisy there? Are you for felons that have paid their debt to society never being able to vote again?"
From the article:
"Oregon’s consent form, specific for the sterilizations of 15 to 20-year-olds, reads, “I understand that the sterilization must be considered permanent and not reversible. I have decided that I do not want to become pregnant, bear children or father children.” In the case that the patient does not speak or read English, an interpreter is permitted to assist the patient “to the best of [his] knowledge and belief” in the signing away of the patient’s reproductive capacity."
WTF: Quit drinking and sober up before you start posting shit.
Did you actually see something in there about "felons"?