Who'll Be The 2020 Dem Presidential Nominee?

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

He's not "killing Trump" and the desperation to pick the ideal VP candidate as some type of backstop because Biden won't make it through the term is appalling.

When the incumbent is losing by 5 points in three swing states and three points in a couple of others, that's getting killed. Not to mention that Texas and North Carolina are a virtual tie. Biden only needs to flip THREE states. Trump is going to be a one term president. You can take that to the Bank.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

When the incumbent is losing by 5 points in three swing states and three points in a couple of others, that's getting killed. Not to mention that Texas and North Carolina are a virtual tie. Biden only needs to flip THREE states. Trump is going to be a one term president. You can take that to the Bank.

too early to make that type of prediction.


wait until october to make it.

[the_real_Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Of course you have absoltely no proof, only opinion, that the DNC forced other Democratic candidates to drop out of the race.

Biden makes his gaffes. The voters do not seem to care. We can argue as to why but the fact is Trump's approval rating has been dropping fairly rapidly and his primary hope at this point in time is that the economy, his only success story, shows significant signs of recovery in the 3rd quarter.

Do you know Tulsi Gabbard did not drop out? Instead the DNC and the media made her irrelevant. Other democrats played the game and took the payoff. This two events demonstrate that something was in play. Standard democrat play.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

When the incumbent is losing by 5 points in three swing states and three points in a couple of others, that's getting killed. Not to mention that Texas and North Carolina are a virtual tie. Biden only needs to flip THREE states. Trump is going to be a one term president. You can take that to the Bank.

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

too early to make that type of prediction.


wait until october to make it.

It's funny watching some make such wild ass moronic predictions this early on.

Biden is likely the nominee, but that isn't even set in stone yet.

And this poster likely considered Hillary a lock based on wider leads during the summer of 2016, but we see how that turned out come Election day November 2016.

Let them throw out their moronic prognostications and wishful thinking, but as you say, those of us in reality will await October to have a better idea.

[oeb11]

H... is still entrenched in the DNC - she engineered a coup in 2016 - and is looking for another opportunity in 2020.

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Do you know Tulsi Gabbard did not drop out? Instead the DNC and the media made her irrelevant. Other democrats played the game and took the payoff. This two events demonstrate that something was in play. Standard democrat play.

Careful Barleycorn, Speedy will ask for evidence for that payoff statement and if you provide it he'll shout "haxor."

[oeb11]

Let the DPST's self congratulate themselves with their slanted Polls.

they behave despicably ala Schiff and his No rule Of law Impeachment committee.
Let them lull themselves into a sincere believe that Biden is invincible in nov 202 - so they can stay home and watch their flat screens and sip chardonnay while congratulating themselves on their "Elitism".



We will see - and if Biden is elected - get ready for Stacy Abrams as POTUS - or if Michelle is VP - for another 8 years of Barack in the Oval Offie.

Or If H... takes the VP nomination - she will achieve her goal - and Act ! will be an EO to have Bill castrated!

[The_Waco_Kid]

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by eccielover

It's funny watching some make such wild ass moronic predictions this early on.

Biden is likely the nominee, but that isn't even set in stone yet.

And this poster likely considered Hillary a lock based on wider leads during the summer of 2016, but we see how that turned out come Election day November 2016.

Let them throw out their moronic prognostications and wishful thinking, but as you say, those of us in reality will await October to have a better idea.

I certainly agree with you that it is way too early to make bold predictions. But how many on this forum have already predicted a Trump victory in November, with some predicting a landslide?

At this point in time in 2016, Clinton had a larger lead than Biden enjoys right now. In several of the states in which Biden holds a lead, the lead is within the margin of error.

I'm finding the Senate races intriguing. Democrat Jones will probably lose in Alabama. Republicans will probably lose their seats in Colorado and Arizona. The only other Democratic seat that has been discussed as a possible loss would be Peters seat in Michigan, but he seems fairly safe at the moment. That leaves several Republican seats in jeopardy -- Collins in Maine and Tillis in NC are rated toss-ups. Ernst in Iowa, the open seat in Kansas, Daines in Montana, and one of the 2 seats in Georgia are lean red. The only poll done in SC has Graham (R) dead even with Harrison (D). Even McConnell is in a seemingly tight race.

I don't see the Democrats gaining control of the Senate in 2020. Too many races would have to fall their way in order for that to happen. But the odds currently are that the Democrats will pick up 1, 2, or even 3 seats.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Careful Barleycorn, Speedy will ask for evidence for that payoff statement and if you provide it he'll shout "haxor."

I think we both know there was no payoff. Another Barleycorn conspiracy theory.

[Chung Tran]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

But how many on this forum have already predicted a Trump victory in November, with some predicting a landslide?

almost all of the right-wingers. the fact that they now say "too early to tell" shows they are starting to get concerned.

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

I think we both know there was no payoff. Another Barleycorn conspiracy theory.

Prove there was no payoff.

[TheDaliLama]

They're stuck with Joe

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Prove there was no payoff.

The burden of proof in our judicial system lies on the side of the accuser. Maybe I paid them off.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

At this point in time in 2016, Clinton had a larger lead than Biden enjoys right now.

Technically, at this point in time in 2016, Clinton hadn't even secured the Dem nomination, so the polls were even more questionable.