Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Gonzo DFW · 01-11-2011, 07:08 PM

Not sure I understand *do*, but get the BGG reference. An Ebay Hooker by any other name is.....who....or perhaps what? But at least it made the thread somewhat interesting, I think.

Gonzo DFW · 01-11-2011, 07:11 PM

Oops, sorry. Hit the button too quick. Not sure who is the troll. Still, I think it's all about the post. Apologies to LOTK for the Shanghai.

Ebay Hooker · 01-11-2011, 10:26 PM

People laughed at my post, but I've gotten pms from four providers who said they could cater to my fetish and asked when I wanted to schedule an appointment. I'll be scheduling an appointment with one of them this week.

Donnie Brasco · 01-11-2011, 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ebay Hooker

People laughed at my post, but I've gotten pms from four providers who said they could cater to my fetish and asked when I wanted to schedule an appointment. I'll be scheduling an appointment with one of them this week.

Positive proof that WALDT.

I'm referring to the providers, not e-bay guy.

elgato111 · 01-12-2011, 03:27 PM

As a hobbyist I don't spend my time asking the provider about her clients, not my business anyway. Only concern is whether or not my experience with her is good and I want more.

Randy4Candy · 01-12-2011, 09:51 PM

I R unsure.....

Reeltalk · 01-14-2011, 06:32 AM

"You have certain agents and suitcase pimps spreading fallacies to new white provider chicks that doing IR will harm their career."

LadyOfTheNight it seems that although this specific topic ("...new white provider chicks...doing IR will harm their career") has NEVER been stated in this specific CONTEXT, there are some who are continually perplexed at the very mention of white providers providing services for African-Americans. They will always make the bold, yet untrue claim that the "topic" has already been overstated and re-hashed - when in fact . . . it really hasn't (they can NEVER point to or identify an actual myriad of posts that SPECIFICALLY addresses or answers the post's central topic or point they claim to have been beaten-ed to death).

See when AA's and white providers are mentioned in the same post (or heaven forbid - the same breath), it doesn't really matter to them that the SPECIFIC nature or context of the question is ENTIRELY different from any that has "already" been asked.
They are just sorely pissed because of the visual they have to endure to get to the other side of the actual question in the thread.

Case in point is in the comment,"...a similar thread was started. Back to square one". Not once in that so-called "similar thread" was anything mentioned or any question asked about "...new white providers chicks.....doing IR will harm their career", which was the actual question asked (and a good one), to be answered by the well-meaning individuals on this board.

But like my ol' grand pops used to say, "throw a rock into a pack of mangy dogs and you can bet that the one you hit, will always be the first to holler".

If you want a question to garner any real and useful answers on this board - you may be hesitant to include any notion of AA's with white providers - or it will be pounced upon by the wounded mongrels, ripped to shreds, then thrown in to the pile of dog crap that has been conveniently labeled for that which it is not - "...one more IR/AA/NBA thread".

OldTimeBuddie · 01-14-2011, 08:31 AM

Well, for example, I believe the question has been answered by several posters in this thread, but let me type it slow for you:

M o s t
o f
u s
d o
n o t
i n q u i r e
a b o u t
w h o
e l s e
t h e
p r o v i d e r
m a y
o r
m a y
n o t
s e e .

IOW, it simply does not matter to pretty much everyone here what a young lady does or does not do, except as it pertains to *our* session, and what *we* would like her to do with *us*, and how safely it can be done. What she may or may not do with someone else, and who that someone else may be is a matter of her choice, and no one else's.

And this has been the conclusion in every other thread on the matter. Whether the young lady is new or long-standing does not change the answer.

Reeltalk · 01-14-2011, 09:37 AM

Lol! Thanks OTB. If you remove the word "provider", I think I can see Alfred Hitchcock's silhouette.

pyramider · 01-15-2011, 10:29 AM

I thought the IR referred to IRS. I would love to screw the IRS.

OldTimeBuddie · 01-15-2011, 10:46 AM

LOL @ pyramider. A certain ... female actor friend of mine, formerly known as The Princess of Porn (anyone?) has a tattoo of lips on her left butt cheek, indicating that the IRS can kiss her *ss.

TexTongue · 01-15-2011, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dannie

post of the day

THREAD OF THE WEEK!

BigEddie · 01-15-2011, 01:22 PM

I only care about how she treats me during my session.

Reeltalk · 01-15-2011, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by delimex007

It's like throwing an atom bomb and saying you are not starting a war- but just asking the opinion regarding the bomb's power !!!

Most questionable post of the day.

WOW! Like throwing an atom bomb?! And starting a war?! Really? Lol! Am I the only one seeing this? Just how much do you have to hate something to liken it to throwing an atom bomb? It's really not all that serious. Thank goodness to threads like these - we know most don't feel this way (inner wars and all). Mad issues man. Incredibly mad issues man.

OldTimeBuddie · 01-15-2011, 03:09 PM

It's a little thing we big kids like to call a "metaphor" and was meant to highlight the absurdity of the OP's claiming she was just asking opinions (which have long been hashed over here) and then equating actually *receiving* those opinions to "a war."

It was *that* post this was in response to, and not the OP.