Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 267
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70799
biomed163389
Yssup Rider61080
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48710
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42878
The_Waco_Kid37233
CryptKicker37224
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-17-2013, 02:25 PM   #31
Ducbutter
Valued Poster
 
Ducbutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 25, 2012
Location: Ahead of you.
Posts: 856
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by austxjr View Post
No, the profiling happened with a landslide of admittedly political organizations applying for 501(C)(4) status after Citizens United.
That's not true. The profiling began in 2010 when there were around 1500 applications filed. According to the IG's report that number was a reduction in filings from the previous year. Filings swelled to around 3500 in 2012 but in 2010 the IRS was not seeing any uptick in requests for exempt status. In fact it was just the opposite.
Ducbutter is offline   Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 05:59 PM   #32
Guest032516
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 1, 2009
Location: TBD
Posts: 7,435
Encounters: 33
Default

Just eliminate the tax exempt status of all of them.

There will be a whole lot less of them to monitor, then.
Guest032516 is offline   Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 12:38 AM   #33
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 06:51 AM   #34
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer View Post
Just eliminate the tax exempt status of all of them.

There will be a whole lot less of them to monitor, then.

WTF is offline   Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 06:55 AM   #35
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

Monkeying around with an already fucked up Tax Code, for the sole purpose of fixing this problem, is the wrong approach..............

The whole tax code should be thrown out - along with the IRS - and a Fair Tax, or some other simpler system adopted.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 07:00 AM   #36
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

And the the IRS harassment wasn't directed solely at the 501-4-C groups (which can do political activity); it included the 5-1-C-3 charitable groups as well......

So your proposal would destroy charitable groups like the American Red Cross.


And your proposal wouldn't put a stop to the business and personal IRS audits of Obama's political enemies that happened...........
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 07:17 AM   #37
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
I'm not a lawyer...but I would need to see what law was broken before sending anyone to jail.
But you know that is not how this game is played.

If a special prosecutor is appointed, then the Administration will go into a defensive mode. They will circle the wagons, a certain panic will set in. Since multitudes of people will have been involved in all of this, they will start trying to get everybody's story straight.

But it never works. Some lower level hack will panic, (the thought of time in Leavenworth does that), and the story will have to be modified, but since you are already locked into half truths so to make it look right at a given moment, everybody will forget what they were supposed to say and start trying to cover their own asses.

Congress will catch one person in a lie, then another, and next thing you know, we have, "what did the President know, and when did he know it".

They NEVER get you for the "crime", which in most cases is rather minor. They get you under oath, telling half truths and using talking points, and you then realize that lying before Congress can land your ass in jail.

Right now, it's all about protecting Hillary. She is the future for keeping the White House till some of us die of old age. I still think that the whole "crime" in the Benghazi thing was not the ineptitude shown after the attack, but the ineptitude that was shown before. Any body with an ounce of common sense knows that in a Hot Spot such as that, you do not leave your embassy with virtually no protection, especially on the anniversary of one of the greatest victories the Islamic Terrorist can claim against the Western Civilizations. All done in the name "don't offend the Muslims"

The question is, how many political hacks does it take to sink a Presidency? Even a future one? History, as in John Dean, tells us only one,
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 07:56 AM   #38
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
Monkeying around with an already fucked up Tax Code, for the sole purpose of fixing this problem, is the wrong approach..............

The whole tax code should be thrown out - along with the IRS - and a Fair Tax, or some other simpler system adopted.
Hey Trendy, WTF happened to Benghazi? Seems as though your panties are now all wadded up over the IRS. A few short days ago, they were all wadded up over Benghazi. You have shown yourself to be a basket case waiting for a new crisis to occur!

Unwad your panties before your head explodes from the bottom up!
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 07:59 AM   #39
nwarounder
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2010
Location: CO
Posts: 2,239
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex View Post
Hey Trendy, WTF happened to Benghazi? Seems as though your panties are now all wadded up over the IRS. A few short days ago, they were all wadded up over Benghazi. You have shown yourself to be a basket case waiting for a new crisis to occur!

Unwad your panties before your head explodes from the bottom up!
With Obama and his criminal gangstas you have to be able to multitask to keep up with all the scandals.
nwarounder is offline   Quote
Old 05-19-2013, 06:27 AM   #40
Chica Chaser
Premium Access
 
Chica Chaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 18, 2009
Location: Mesaba
Posts: 31,149
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
I do not want a witch hunt. I do not want Ken Starr starting withe Whitewater and then going after a blowjob.

I want the numbers. That does not need a SP. But is they want to limit the SP to the numbers...ok. Call in an apolitical 12 grade math major...adding up the number of groups that applied for 5014c status in that time frame can not be that difficult. Nor can counting the number who were reviewed. Nor can finding out if the ratio are close.

That is pretty simple math.

But I suspect you want a witch hunt.

I want the numbers...if they don't add up, I want those responsible fired. Case closed.
With this transparent administration it should be pretty easy to pull those numbers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer View Post
Just eliminate the tax exempt status of all of them.

There will be a whole lot less of them to monitor, then.
Amen....if they want to have their little organizations, they can pay taxes like everyone else. Or do away with the whole damn thing and move to the Fair Tax and all this type of shit goes away.
Chica Chaser is offline   Quote
Old 05-19-2013, 07:05 AM   #41
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chica Chaser View Post



Amen....if they want to have their little organizations, they can pay taxes like everyone else. Or do away with the whole damn thing and move to the Fair Tax and all this type of shit goes away.
This should be the real story....do away with these 501c4's.

Quit having the taxpayers support your chairty.

Quit hiding your donorers under the guise of some tax exempt...

We the public should be able to follow the money in politics. These 501c4's are making that harder.

That is the real scandle here. That they approved any of these political groups. They should jerk them all both left and right wing. I hope that is what comes of this , which is to say tax reform. Some of these folks better watch what they wish for.

These right wing 501's are like a bunch of crooks bitching that the government is not going after the other crooks....while they have a valid point, they forget they are fucking crooks too.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 05-19-2013, 09:04 AM   #42
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

You all can thank the SCOTUS for this!!!!
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 05-19-2013, 01:20 PM   #43
Randy4Candy
Valued Poster
 
Randy4Candy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 30, 2009
Location: Hwy 380 Revisited
Posts: 3,333
Encounters: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer View Post
Just eliminate the tax exempt status of all of them.

There will be a whole lot less of them to monitor, then.
A-fucking-men!
Randy4Candy is offline   Quote
Old 05-19-2013, 01:21 PM   #44
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

American Red Cross; the American Cancer Society; et al.....................?

Nope !

Why would you want the American Cancer Society to pay taxes on it's revenue ?

Do away with the current system and replace it with the Fair Tax !
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 05-19-2013, 01:29 PM   #45
Randy4Candy
Valued Poster
 
Randy4Candy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 30, 2009
Location: Hwy 380 Revisited
Posts: 3,333
Encounters: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by austxjr View Post

#8 - Because of Nixon's abuses of the IRS Congress made the IRS a semi-autonomous agency and firewalled all political communication between the IRS and WH off. Screams that Obama isn't in charge of the IRS are absurd since that is exactly what Congress intended. Conservatives didn't scream that Bush wasn't in charge of the military (though he WAS Commander in Chief) - and got a nice little plane ride onto an aircraft carrier, too - when Abu Ghraib happened and they completely accepted that it was only low level soldiers who perpetrated torture and killing. Are you really saying that questions and delays of conservatives are far worse than torture and killing of POWs (though they are foreigners aren't they?).
That's because they don't have the irrational hatred for Shrub that they have for Obama. Anyone see any "compassionate conservatism" around here lately?
Randy4Candy is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved