The presidential debate - debate

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Nope. Now that you reitterated the Owens was wrong, I still want to know why you don't equally condemn Bush-2's bravado photo ops in Iraq? If you don't like Obama taking credit, why do you like Bush taking credit? He didn't pull the trigge either.

By the way, before you jump to the wrong conclusion, I have nothing against Bush's actions--I see it exactly in the same light as Obama's and see nothing wrong with either. You are the one who thinks one is right and the other wrong based upon the party they belong to.

It's still all about the pronouns, Old-T. Bush generously employed "they" and used "we" often. Odumbo, on the other hand, narcissistically over-employs the pronoun "I". BTW, Mark Owens only correctly organized and related information that was already in the public record -- Odumbo and his people are the one's who let the secrets "slip out".

[i'va biggen]

Leno said on his show there will be fact checkers standing by in case either candidate states one..

[acp5762]

The 47% comment might just work in Romney's favor. Some of those 47% might just realize what he was really talking about and some of those 47% might just wake up and support Romney cause they don't consider themselves a total waste and burden on society.

[CJ7]

lol

[acp5762]

Originally Posted by waverunner234

Especially as a corporate raider, the way he got rich.
Did he care about all the people he fired?
Not a single moment. The money was what made him do what he did.

Tell us all how Obama got rich, cause he is ya know.

[markroxny]

Originally Posted by acp5762

The 47% comment might just work in Romney's favor. Some of those 47% might just realize what he was really talking about and some of those 47% might just wake up and support Romney cause they don't consider themselves a total waste and burden on society.

Unlikely. Remember he said that "they aren't going to vote for me no matter what". He dismissed them. He basically said fuck em. So far all he has said in defense is that well he didn't really mean it the way he said it.

Fact is it hurt him ...bad. But he can't get away from it. And the fact is that 47% of the American people DO NOT see themselves as victims that the government owes food and housing. Only thing he can do is say that it came out wrong, here is what I meant to say. But he can't linger on it, it will only hurt him more

BTW, his runnign mate sees it as the 30 % not 47%

SMH

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/10...0-percent.html

[acp5762]

Originally Posted by markroxny

Unlikely. Remember he said that "they aren't going to vote for me no matter what". He dismissed them. He basically said fuck em. So far all he has said in defense is that well he didn't really mean it the way he said it.

Fact is it hurt him ...bad. But he can't get away from it. And the fact is that 47% of the American people DO NOT see themselves as victims that the government owes food and housing. Only thing he can do is say that it came out wrong, here is what I meant to say. But he can't linger on it, it will only hurt him more

BTW, his runnign mate sees it as the 30 % not 47%

SMH

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/10...0-percent.html

Well if 47% of the voters have no use for Romney and the remaining 53% of voters do, well guess what.

[markroxny]

Originally Posted by acp5762

Well if 47% of the voters have no use for Romney and the remaining 53% of voters do, well guess what.

That's not what's happening tho.

Romney is going to lose.

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/...-electoral-map

[CJ7]

willard spit on the middle working class aka 47% .. if 3% of the estimated 6% of undecided voters are pissed off middle class workers (not counting the elderly, people in the military, and educated women who are also undecided) ... guess what?

[SEE3772]

How can the D's & the R's, a "Duopoly" debate?
Where are the rest of the presidential candidates?

[markroxny]

Originally Posted by SEE3772

How can the D's & the R's, a "Duopoly" debate?
Where are the rest of the presidential candidates?

Good question. Where's this year's Ross Perot or Ralph Nader?

[CJ7]

Johnson is on the ballot in enough states its possible he can piss in the "party punch bowl" and sour up the election ... to what extent, and to which party is yet to be determined.

[acp5762]

Originally Posted by markroxny

That's not what's happening tho.

Romney is going to lose.

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/...-electoral-map

Maybe, maybe not.

[CJ7]

with the electoral votes in the swing states leaning away from willard, and leaning further every day, the boy needs a magic wand to win ...

[Yssup Rider]