Obama’s blue dress.......

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

You're trying too hard NOW. With this post. Yssup Hummer is not here to use "yous" anymore. Only funny to you.

See what I did there? Now "dats" genius.

Yous is wronger than socks being worn with sandals in clarksville!

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

I know what a metaphor is, man. That's why I put it in quotes. Sir.

The following piece is an exercise in imagined online journalism class over video conferencing. Enjoy.

Oh. FOX. Right. Sure.


Why Are Writers and Editors So Obsessed With Tucker Carlson?


https://www.politico.com/news/magazi...ltitude-257560

.

That you can not, will not debate what Carlson says, something that should be so easy to do according to you, yet you won't. Tells me all I need to know.


And why are some many people "afraid" of Carlson? It what happens to anybody especially the "lead dog" speaking truth to power. If he wasn't such a threat, they would have no interest in him at all.


I just wish you would be man enough to debate me on the topics. I'll defend what he says, you tell us why it's not true. Seems like it would be so simple and yet you refuse. I guess you just don't have the time.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by HedonistForever

That you can not, will not debate what Carlson says, something that should be so easy to do according to you, yet you won't. Tells me all I need to know.


And why are some many people "afraid" of Carlson? It what happens to anybody especially the "lead dog" speaking truth to power. If he wasn't such a threat, they would have no interest in him at all.


I just wish you would be man enough to debate me on the topics. I'll defend what he says, you tell us why it's not true. Seems like it would be so simple and yet you refuse. I guess you just don't have the time.

It's not worth the time. He's not worth the time. FOX isn't worth the time. You relying on FOX and Carlson to speak truth to power tells me all I need to know. He's, as the piece says, just a provocateur. Sensational. A showman. Ringmaster. Putting on an opinion-based show that "certain" easily manipulated people find informative.

It's not. Some stay away from the flame-throwing commentary so as not to be thrown in the mix. Or mud. Carlson knows how to get to nerve of some. To me, he's just part of the powerful elite trying to stay on top.

But hey, I get it. His delivery and word smithing is seductive.

[eccieuser9500]

This is one of my favorite examples. A fellow Conservative billionaire has to keep reminding him of the point he's made just a few seconds prior.

The look on Carlson's face is priceless. He's not serious.

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

It's not worth the time. He's not worth the time. FOX isn't worth the time. You relying on FOX and Carlson to speak truth to power tells me all I need to know. He's, as the piece says, just a provocateur. Sensational. A showman. Ringmaster. Putting on an opinion-based show that "certain" easily manipulated people find informative.

It's not. Some stay away from the flame-throwing commentary so as not to be thrown in the mix. Or mud. Carlson knows how to get to nerve of some. To me, he's just part of the powerful elite trying to stay on top.

But hey, I get it. His delivery and word smithing is seductive.

OK, let's forget about Carlson and forget about Fox news. I can see it triggers you and causes you distress and I'm not here to push people any further than they already are in their TDS.


Let's try this, having nothing to do with Carlson or Fox but the facts from recently released documents.


What do you think of the head of Counter Intelligence of the FBI writing in regard to interviewing General Flynn


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/13/us/politics/bill-priestap-michael-flynn.html

Mr. Priestap wrote: “What’s our goal? Truth/admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?”

How does an FBI agent ask if the goal of an interview is to get the truth?


To me, that is clear cut malfeasance by the FBI and grounds in and of itself to dismiss the case against Flynn. Now add to that all the other information that was released. After a 5 month investigation of Flynn, the FBI said they found nothing derogatory on Flynn but Peter Strozk probably on orders of Comey, then decided to set Flynn up since they couldn't find what they wanted to find.


https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/fbi-found-no-derogatory-russia-evidence-flynn-planned

"The absence of any derogatory information or lead information from these logical sources reduce the number of investigative avenues and techniques to pursue. Per the direction of FBI management, Crossfire Razor was not interviewed as part of the case closing procedure. The FBI is closing this investigation," the agent wrote on Jan. 4, 2017.

https://justthenews.com/sites/defaul...eCloseMemo.pdf

Two agents went to the White House to question Mr. Flynn. He lied repeatedly, and prosecutors have said that agents gave him “multiple opportunities to correct his false statements by revisiting key questions.”

Where is the proof of that?


https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/497064-why-dismiss-the-flynn-case-because-the-fbi-cant-prove-it


Next, if you choose to play, we'll examine why Adam Schiff continues to lie when in 57 interviews not on single person not Comey, not Clapper, not Brennan, not Susan Rice, not Loretta Lynch, no one said they ever saw any evidence of collusion and Schiff says he saw it but will not produce the evidence he says he has seen. Does that trouble you?

[oeb11]

HF - agree - and the Lies of the Obama administration, and persecution of flynn to cover their asses - bothers DPST's not at all.
Factual Truth is anathema - that is why they are so afraid of Carlson, Hannity, and Ingraham. They speak factual truth - not the Lies of the DPSTR narrative.

And - facts may be getting ready to bite their Liberal Lying Asses - And what will XiNN and the wacomPost have to write about that???

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by HedonistForever

OK, let's forget about Carlson and forget about Fox news. I can see it triggers you and causes you distress and I'm not here to push people any further than they already are in their TDS.


Let's try this, having nothing to do with Carlson or Fox but the facts from recently released documents.


What do you think of the head of Counter Intelligence of the FBI writing in regard to interviewing General Flynn


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/13/us/politics/bill-priestap-michael-flynn.html






How does an FBI agent ask if the goal of an interview is to get the truth?


To me, that is clear cut malfeasance by the FBI and grounds in and of itself to dismiss the case against Flynn. Now add to that all the other information that was released. After a 5 month investigation of Flynn, the FBI said they found nothing derogatory on Flynn but Peter Strozk probably on orders of Comey, then decided to set Flynn up since they couldn't find what they wanted to find.


https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/fbi-found-no-derogatory-russia-evidence-flynn-planned







https://justthenews.com/sites/defaul...eCloseMemo.pdf







Where is the proof of that?


https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/497064-why-dismiss-the-flynn-case-because-the-fbi-cant-prove-it


Next, if you choose to play, we'll examine why Adam Schiff continues to lie when in 57 interviews not on single person not Comey, not Clapper, not Brennan, not Susan Rice, not Loretta Lynch, no one said they ever saw any evidence of collusion and Schiff says he saw it but will not produce the evidence he says he has seen. Does that trouble you?

I will play, but I am busy. Even have to work tomorrow.

Since oeb11 decided to insert his incessant stupidity, with whatever he posted (still on ignore), I feel less inclined. I'm just not invested in this as a retiree who sits in front of tube being brainwashed.

P.S. You might want to work on your linking of websites or articles. I get multiple links to multiple articles. Unless that was your intent.

I don't have Obama Compulsive Disorder.

[oeb11]

9500- If i am on your ignore - it is U defending yourself from very uncomfortable Truths u do not wish to see.



I have never written that You are "Stupid" - and challenge Writing that as a Rules Violation.

[eccieuser9500]

There he goes again.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

There he goes again.

Aww, this is getting sad like when Lucas spouts off about shit being posted by someone about him while never actually looking at the posts.

If you are gonna fucking ignore someone, ignore them and don't play sissy games either theorizing about what they are posting or reading it and answering while pretending not to read it.

That is really the actions of the sad.

[eccieuser9500]

If you say so. What's sad is the repeated DPST shit over and over again he obsesses over. Theory based on past patterns.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

If you say so.

No your petty pretending of ignoring(which is a root of ignorance and I'll let you consider the applicability of that), is what says so.

[eccieuser9500]

If you think so. How do you know I'm pretending to ignore him? Just because I can see he posted? Please!

So . . . this metaphorical blue dress thing. You have any incredible revelations?

Thought so. Sad.

[eccieuser9500]

As far as the ignorance thing - I would be if this magic bombshell came from the little, little man himself.

You assume too much young asshopper.

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

I will play, but I am busy. Even have to work tomorrow.

Since oeb11 decided to insert his incessant stupidity, with whatever he posted (still on ignore), I feel less inclined. I'm just not invested in this as a retiree who sits in front of tube being brainwashed.

P.S. You might want to work on your linking of websites or articles. I get multiple links to multiple articles. Unless that was your intent.

I don't have Obama Compulsive Disorder.

Then let me explain. I gave you a link to the NYT's just in case you need proof from your paper of record, that this hand written memo from the FBI, is what was actually found in the newest release of documents. I mean I could have posted Fox News and Carlson since both reported on this "fact" but then you would give me some lame ass excuse that you don't accept "facts" from Fox News and Tucker Carlson so I went out of my way to get it from the New York Times. I even had to subscribe to get it.



I'm just looking for a worthy opponent which you use to be when I first got here and then dried up to one liner's and meme's.


The first "Just the news" site was an article explaining the topic, the second, was the actually PDF file just in case you didn't want to believe what was written in the article because it was done by John Soloman who I suppose isn't worthy of your time either. I'm going way out of my way to show you nothing but facts, the just released documents so you can't bitch about authors.


I got lazy on the 3rd cite "The Hill" which I guess you don't waste your time on either.


It's tough to find you CNN and MSNBC reports because they don't report the facts.


Have you read any of the 57 super secret transcripts that Adam Schiff kept locked away because he knew they would show that nobody ever said they saw any information that linked Trump to Russian interference?


Do you have any interest in reading actual FBI files and actual transcripts? I do. Silly question, you don't have time, I mean why would you, you instinctively know the answers to all these questions I guess.


There was no evidence of Trump being a Russian asset. There was proof that the FISA Court was abused. Adam Schiff, CNN and MSNBC said it wasn't, they were wrong. The Steele dossier was Russian disinformation and even the NYT's said so. Now the files and the transcripts are all being released and everything you have been listening to for over 3 years were lies, that's just a now proven fact and there is a whole lot more coming.

I don't have Obama Compulsive Disorder.

What you don't have is any interest in finding out what the Obama Biden administration was doing, none but that's OK, John Durham is interested.