This pos might seem off topic. Probably is. But it's on the topic of being off topic. But the last two parts are completely off topic.
1. Bubba, I'm confused. You wanted a Mod to answer your question then leave it open for general discussion. The topics question was answered. Three times if I am not mistaken. But the very nature of the topic leaves little room for discussion unless you want to arfue whether or not the board should implement such a rule, which is boring. So the thread is going to flow to related topics, such as how one feels about pics being posted without permission or how one feels about them being taken at all. Or larger photography laws.:And for the most part everyone has been talking on those points. Except for the occassional interruption.
As for those related topics. Some states have stricter laws than others. And there is a movement to make laws that prevent photography w/o permission as seen in Japan. And for the most part that is to create copy right laws for a persons image to combat papparazzi.
2. As for me personally, if I ever end up with a few private photos none of you will see them unless she posts them. For I am gentleman, and I would never try to disrespect our princesses.
3. Way off topic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torre Tames
Yes....totally....I agree with REESE on THAT point.
BUBBA....high five. I appreciate that you posted this thread.
I've seen pics of ladies...that I KNOW was not approved of (in their mind).
It is not, in my opinion....what is LEGAL....but what is MORAL.
Shit....Morality is a dirty word on this board. Fuck it. But we choose who we see...and who we allow to take pics
I guess it boils down to common sense.
However, asking some gents who have the opportunity (or force the opportinuty) who take pics.....asking them to please be respectful to the women allowing them to do so.
I've had pics taken by clients.....and they gave me the disc so I would decide what I wanted to make public. Again....common sense of who I choose to see.
Hugs,
TT
|
Morality is a dirty word?! Morality is the basis of my arguement on why the hobby should be sancationed by the gov! But that is for another thread.
4. Eh kind of off topic... no wait it is off topic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PODarkness
To answer the question brought up about what the law says...
From what I was told when I started creating web sites, photos taken in public places are fair game for the photographer to do with as he/she pleases, including posting or putting up for sale to the highest bidder. Paparazzi photos fall under this heading.
As I understand it, private photos ( photos not taken in public places) are property of the photographer and can be posted without a models release as long as its not for comercial purposes (not for profit). You can post embarrassing pics of your ex without a models release from her, but you can't sell the pics or charge people to see them unless you've got the paperwork.
How any of that applies to Bubba's question is anyone's guess. It's not like we hobby within the law... or is that just me?
POD
|
I hobby within Scottish Law, good sir.