Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Now, however, it is run by a black woman! Is Loretta Lynch biased against blacks? The FBI reports to a black woman!!!
Do you get it?
She's been attorney gen since 2015. Not even a year. It wasn't always run by a black woman.
And if you've taken a poly sci class you would know that no one person can change our Government and how it conducts it's affairs (doesn't matter if the person is black, purple or blue). The system is corrupt - which is why Trump, Bernie, Cruz doesn't stand a chance in high hell.
Anyone that thinks otherwise isn't very bright and should consider taking a political science class.
True, but a black man was AG for 6 yrs before her.
Again, race doesn't matter. If it mattered, blacks would be better off with Obama in office. My point was the system has always been corrupt and Hilary Clinton will be our next president. It's just a matter of what position and if lube will be involved at this point.
The FBI stats sure reflect what Ive seen in real life, as well as the real lives of other people.
Denial wont change the fact that blacks are FAR more likely to commit murder, other violent crimes, or property crimes than any other race.
And if this is your reality, fantastic - it seems to comfort you.
I've traveled all around the world and can tell you that there are good and bad people of all races.
If you choose to subscribe to the notion that black people are monsters, again, that's just fantabulous. Everyone should live their lives how they see fit.
And if this is your reality, fantastic - it seems to comfort you.
I've traveled all around the world and can tell you that there are good and bad people of all races.
If you choose to subscribe to the notion that black people are monsters, again, that's just fantabulous. Everyone should live their lives how they see fit.
It isn't really a matter of whether or not black people and white people commit crimes, or that black people are all bad. There are plenty of good black people out there. Some of them have also been victimized by other bad black people!
That doesn't contradict the fact that blacks are much more likely to murder other people than any other race.
Ironically, I learned that in my political science class before the entire University was put on lockdown for two weeks after an active chalker was seen on campus!!!
Yeah, yeah... theres good and bad in every race. Just some a LOT, and I mean a LOT more than others.
This is why if you wanna live in a white neighborhood, and send your kids to safe white schools, you have to pay lots of money. If your reality was actually real, then black neighborhoods wouldnt be so violent; Somalia would be no more or less violent than Switzerland.
Denying reality doesnt make it change. Reality does not change to suit your feelings. But go ahead, bury your head in the sand if that makes you feel better.
There are plenty of good black people out there. Some of them have also been victimized by other bad black people!
Yup.
There are plenty of good white people out there. Some of them have also been victimized by other bad white people!
Quote:
Originally Posted by cockmeatsandwich
Yeah, yeah... theres good and bad in every race. Just some a LOT, and I mean a LOT more than others.
This is why if you wanna live in a white neighborhood, and send your kids to safe white schools, you have to pay lots of money. If your reality was actually real, then black neighborhoods wouldnt be so violent; Somalia would be no more or less violent than Switzerland.
Denying reality doesnt make it change. Reality does not change to suit your feelings. But go ahead, bury your head in the sand if that makes you feel better.
In my country, they call people like you "olodo".
If "denying reality" is going off my experience and not making decisions based on fbi stats, then I'm guilty.
When I came to the states, I was told that whites hung blacks on trees for sport, if I were ignorant I would've avoided white people for a very long time. Your race ain't perfect. But I'll continue to pretend that you are all innocent of any wrongdoing.
There are plenty of good white people out there. Some of them have also been victimized by other bad white people!
In my country, they call people like you "olodo".
If "denying reality" is going off my experience and not making decisions based on fbi stats, then I'm guilty.
When I came to the states, I was told that whites hung blacks on trees for sport, if I were ignorant I would've avoided white people for a very long time. Your race ain't perfect. But I'll continue to pretend that you are all innocent of any wrongdoing.
Monsters come in all shapes, colors, and sizes. Perpetuating something that is nothing, is craziness. I have friends of all nationalities and races, hon. And I'm going to say this as kindly as I can and from my own personal experience and no one else's. My black friends have the propensity to get really riled and indignant about these things, and not that anyone in the US can not understand why, but we are not living in the past. Please just breathe and note your surroundings. There are more tolerant people in the world than there ever have been and that's what we need to focus on going forward. Stepping backward in time or continuing to perpetuate something of this nature is irritating to those who see it and can even understand and have compassion for the suffering of others.
I feel responsible and keep getting it thrown in my face how tough it was for black people, yeah well, it was tough for Jews, it's been tough for women, it's been tough for kids, and ummm....no one gets out completely unscathed. So, let's don't scathe if we can help it, ya know? I apologize for every prejudice a**hat that ever walked. I'll not promote anything I know is a horrible incident, but I wouldn't promote or even entertain the idea that this is what it is being made out to be.
I saw a video a while back of some black girls in college who got kicked out of Trumps "I'm the worst idea ever" campaign event at a University. What happened with the pushing and shoving made me want to puke, knowing some individuals behaved that way and I hope lots of charges were pressed against those ignorant jerks! I really do!
But, the interviews where the young ladies were interviewed after being escorted out and then stating the only reason they got thrown out was because they were black is inflammatory. Because come to find out later, they failed to mention they had crashed the event and were not invited. LOL Then the very next interview I watched were some black girls all dressed in black, and proud they were making some kinda point while crashing the event uninvited. I wish I knew of some white, purple, or green kids who had crashed the event. But, I'm not sure they might have an agenda such as those who perpetuate things of this nature. Make sense?
BTW, Bill Clinton is not the most errr, ummm...honest individual. He did kind of blow his credibility with being "truthful" when he got on TV and LIED to a whole world. ijs The title drew me to this thread..it was funny, as sad as that is to say.
Again, race doesn't matter. If it mattered, blacks would be better off with Obama in office. My point was the system has always been corrupt and Hilary Clinton will be our next president. It's just a matter of what position and if lube will be involved at this point.
race does matter. isn't that the mantra BLM chants? if they say it matters, then it does!
more on that racist bunch of trouble makers later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cockmeatsandwich
Yeah, yeah... theres good and bad in every race. Just some a LOT, and I mean a LOT more than others.
This is why if you wanna live in a white neighborhood, and send your kids to safe white schools, you have to pay lots of money. If your reality was actually real, then black neighborhoods wouldnt be so violent; Somalia would be no more or less violent than Switzerland.
Denying reality doesnt make it change. Reality does not change to suit your feelings. But go ahead, bury your head in the sand if that makes you feel better.
and the stats bear it out. even some of the top 10 most prosperous nations in Africa have murder per capita several times as high as the US. you might not like this truth sweetpea, but if blacks stopped killing blacks the murder rate in this country would be one of the lowest in the world. as it is, it's not nearly as high as "some" would want you to believe. i.e. Obama.
you are in luck. i recently showed how even prosperity doesn't seem to matter in Africa. some of the most prosperous nations in Africa have murder per capita rates that are nothing short of a COMBAT ZONE. hmm? why is that?
the USA is not even close to the most violent nation. not in the top 25. not in the top 50. Yet all these libtards seem to think anyone who owns a gun "must be" violent. NOT.
Algeria 0.7 280
Well! is there actually one African nation that's peaceful? might be Algeria.
Remember these are the 10 most prosperous nations, you'd expect at least a few to be civilized.
of the top 10 most prosperous nations in Africa, only Senegal (10th), Algeria (6th), Tunisia (5th) and Morocco (3rd) have lower murder rates per capita than the USA.
that's the good news. now the bad news, of the remaining top 10 in wealth and prosperity in Africa, the place is a WAR ZONE!
All of these nations are at least 85-90% Black. Many nearly 100%.
how is that anyone else's fault but the blacks in those nations? How???
so .. sweetpea .. why is Africa a combat zone? whose fault is that? and remember sister, this is the top 10 most prosperous. care to see what the bottom end is?
nope i didn't think you did.
let me tell you something very simple sweetpea, if blacks in America ,, or anywhere else in the world .. want the other races (white, Asian, Latino) to take them seriously ..
then clean up your act! stop killing yourselves and burning down whole cities just because you don't like the fact that a "bad actor" in police jargon committed a crime and resisted arrest.
do that and then let's talk. i'll be back shortly after i get me a smash burger and a bottle of scotch to enjoy the evening's frivolities.
BRB ...
frivolities .. i so rarely get to use that word in a sentence! just like .. Gargantuan
While efforts to reform criminal justice and policing policies have swept the nation – and particularly in red states, with many big initiatives helmed by Republican governors – the Obama administration's Department of Justice has continued to prop up "tough on crime" policies ripped from the 80s and 90s that do more harm than good.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch quietly reinstituted the Department of Justice's Equitable Sharing Program recently, which incentivizes local authorities to more harshly prosecute cases in order to take advantage of asset forfeiture laws, allowing these local departments to confiscate personal property they believe is related to criminal activity – including cars, boats and cash – without trial or any due process beyond even suspicion, and share those seizures with federal authorities.
The Equitable Sharing Program allows local authorities to get around state rules and pursue federal forfeiture laws. In many states, this means the authorities have much wider latitude because federal laws can be so much broader. This circumvents many states that have begun instituting sweeping restrictions to their own asset forfeiture laws – a case of the federal government prioritizing their own policy rather than letting states decide.
Asset forfeiture laws disproportionately affect vulnerable poor and minority populations. The kinds of crimes involved, and the lack of resources that victims of asset forfeiture typically have to fight them, are important here. In many cases of abuse, police are seizing things from people who merely wish to pursue their dreams. In 2015, authorities seized the life savings of a 22-year-old traveling to California to start a career in the entertainment industry. In 2012, they seized over $17,000 from a barbecue restaurant owner – who had to shutter his restaurant as a result. In 2007, police took thousands from a family with two small children traveling through Texas after they were pulled over and the police found the cash in their car.
None of these people were ever charged with a crime.
What makes this all the worse is the great reforms being undertaken on the state level. From Pennsylvania to Tennessee to Wisconsin to Wyoming and elsewhere, state activists and legislatures have taken great effort to curb these abusive practices in the last couple of years. Just last week, Florida Gov. Rick Scott signed one of the best reforms along these lines – a law that will require actually charging suspects with a crime in any asset-forfeiture case.
None of these people were ever charged with a crime.
What makes this all the worse is the great reforms being undertaken on the state level. From Pennsylvania to Tennessee to Wisconsin to Wyoming and elsewhere, state activists and legislatures have taken great effort to curb these abusive practices in the last couple of years. Just last week, Florida Gov. Rick Scott signed one of the best reforms along these lines – a law that will require actually charging suspects with a crime in any asset-forfeiture case.
Lynch will undo all of that with the continuation of the Equitable Sharing Program. Local authorities have increasingly abused the program, with the federal payments ballooning from $200 million in 2000 to more than $600 million in 2013, according to the Institute for Justice. The program became so abused that the original reason it was suspended last year was a lack of funds – the program had grown too large, and federal budget cuts meant that the Department of Justice could no longer afford to continue operations.
Lynch has apparently found the money, however, and that'll mean that local authorities will continue to be able to seize from ordinary Americans who aren't charged with crimes. And with asset forfeiture reforms that have spread across the country, the authorities will increase their use of the sharing program to circumvent their own jurisdictions. In Maryland's proposed reforms, for example, there's explicit language allowing the practice.
There are more and better reforms that can be done for forfeiture. The proposals that would force authorities to actually charge a crime before seizing property is a good one. Repealing the standard policy that individual departments can be funded with seizures would be another good one. Having police seizures go into a general revenue fund rather than earmarked to fund the police themselves would curb the incentive for the indiscriminate seizures that have caused these high-profile problems.
All this means is that while states have been making real progress on reforming asset forfeiture laws that have led to decades of abuse, the Department of Justice is securing the ability for state and local authorities to continue business-as-usual. It's a shame that, after so much success for reform on the asset forfeiture front, the federal government is going to roll back the clock by reinstating one of the primary drivers of the problem.
be careful on your next hooker road-trip little sister, Obama and Lynch might confiscate all your hard earned cash!
Yeah, yeah... theres good and bad in every race. Just some a LOT, and I mean a LOT more than others.
This is why if you wanna live in a white neighborhood, and send your kids to safe white schools, you have to pay lots of money. If your reality was actually real, then black neighborhoods wouldnt be so violent; Somalia would be no more or less violent than Switzerland.
Denying reality doesnt make it change. Reality does not change to suit your feelings. But go ahead, bury your head in the sand if that makes you feel better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
what's the matter sweetpea? you haven't replied. all we got is .
.
let's be clear little sister, if you want to post with the big dogs in this forum you need brass
cajones .. or in your case brass nipples.
now let's talk about the new racist AG of Obama shall we? she may be new to the job but she's off to a great start .. NOT
A Setback for Justice
Obama's DOJ is doing criminal justice reform no favors by propping up unfair asset forfeiture laws.
While efforts to reform criminal justice and policing policies have swept the nation – and particularly in red states, with many big initiatives helmed by Republican governors – the Obama administration's Department of Justice has continued to prop up "tough on crime" policies ripped from the 80s and 90s that do more harm than good.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch quietly reinstituted the Department of Justice's Equitable Sharing Program recently, which incentivizes local authorities to more harshly prosecute cases in order to take advantage of asset forfeiture laws, allowing these local departments to confiscate personal property they believe is related to criminal activity – including cars, boats and cash – without trial or any due process beyond even suspicion, and share those seizures with federal authorities.
The Equitable Sharing Program allows local authorities to get around state rules and pursue federal forfeiture laws. In many states, this means the authorities have much wider latitude because federal laws can be so much broader. This circumvents many states that have begun instituting sweeping restrictions to their own asset forfeiture laws – a case of the federal government prioritizing their own policy rather than letting states decide.
Asset forfeiture laws disproportionately affect vulnerable poor and minority populations. The kinds of crimes involved, and the lack of resources that victims of asset forfeiture typically have to fight them, are important here. In many cases of abuse, police are seizing things from people who merely wish to pursue their dreams. In 2015, authorities seized the life savings of a 22-year-old traveling to California to start a career in the entertainment industry. In 2012, they seized over $17,000 from a barbecue restaurant owner – who had to shutter his restaurant as a result. In 2007, police took thousands from a family with two small children traveling through Texas after they were pulled over and the police found the cash in their car.
None of these people were ever charged with a crime.
What makes this all the worse is the great reforms being undertaken on the state level. From Pennsylvania to Tennessee to Wisconsin to Wyoming and elsewhere, state activists and legislatures have taken great effort to curb these abusive practices in the last couple of years. Just last week, Florida Gov. Rick Scott signed one of the best reforms along these lines – a law that will require actually charging suspects with a crime in any asset-forfeiture case.
None of these people were ever charged with a crime.
What makes this all the worse is the great reforms being undertaken on the state level. From Pennsylvania to Tennessee to Wisconsin to Wyoming and elsewhere, state activists and legislatures have taken great effort to curb these abusive practices in the last couple of years. Just last week, Florida Gov. Rick Scott signed one of the best reforms along these lines – a law that will require actually charging suspects with a crime in any asset-forfeiture case.
Lynch will undo all of that with the continuation of the Equitable Sharing Program. Local authorities have increasingly abused the program, with the federal payments ballooning from $200 million in 2000 to more than $600 million in 2013, according to the Institute for Justice. The program became so abused that the original reason it was suspended last year was a lack of funds – the program had grown too large, and federal budget cuts meant that the Department of Justice could no longer afford to continue operations.
Lynch has apparently found the money, however, and that'll mean that local authorities will continue to be able to seize from ordinary Americans who aren't charged with crimes. And with asset forfeiture reforms that have spread across the country, the authorities will increase their use of the sharing program to circumvent their own jurisdictions. In Maryland's proposed reforms, for example, there's explicit language allowing the practice.
There are more and better reforms that can be done for forfeiture. The proposals that would force authorities to actually charge a crime before seizing property is a good one. Repealing the standard policy that individual departments can be funded with seizures would be another good one. Having police seizures go into a general revenue fund rather than earmarked to fund the police themselves would curb the incentive for the indiscriminate seizures that have caused these high-profile problems.
All this means is that while states have been making real progress on reforming asset forfeiture laws that have led to decades of abuse, the Department of Justice is securing the ability for state and local authorities to continue business-as-usual. It's a shame that, after so much success for reform on the asset forfeiture front, the federal government is going to roll back the clock by reinstating one of the primary drivers of the problem.
be careful on your next hooker road-trip little sister, Obama and Lynch might confiscate all your hard earned cash!
I meant it when I said I don't care. I especially don't care to argue with someone who can't make a point without posting a lame vid or meme. Go troll someone else hun. Not interested.
I meant it when I said I don't care. I especially don't care to argue with someone who can't make a point without posting a lame vid or meme. Go troll someone else hun. Not interested.
So you do until you start losing the argument, then you don't.
