Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 278
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163220
Yssup Rider60919
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48646
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42564
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid36978
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-27-2014, 01:03 PM   #31
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,919
Encounters: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You're the one that missed the point, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. The dim-retards -- including your butt-buddy Odumbo -- initiated this pro forma tactic, and they have now reaped what they have sown.
No YOU missed the point!!!!!
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 11:45 PM   #32
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
Missed the point as usual IB next president will find he is unable to hire and fire those in his department.
???

Can you explain this statement?

CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:10 AM   #33
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

A monkey wrote it.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 03:05 AM   #34
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
WTF????

How about the 1,400 decisions handed down by the NRLA?

It is a very big deal....but then again, you don't WTF.
Did you miss this post?


Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Yes that is correct but what I didn't make clear was..... they have fixed the problem of not having nominees filibustered and the recess appointments had been confirmed.



A year and a half after the recess appointments, the Senate confirmed a full slate of NLRB members, as well as Cordray at the CFPB.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/06/supreme-court-recess-appointments-obama-noel-canning


but you are correct, this could be problematic.

But any vote the NLRB took between the recess appointments and official confirmation can now be challenged under the Supreme Court's logic....

....While he's had an easier time getting his judges and staff confirmed since the Senate went nuclear on the filibuster, Republicans are projected to retake the Senate in the midterm elections. Obama better make sure he gets all of his staff in place before the end of the year if he doesn't want an empty White House as he winds down his final term in office.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 05:58 AM   #35
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
???

Can you explain this statement?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly View Post
A monkey wrote it.
In your case you are a idiot, turd fly.


You clowns realize it (the SCOTUS decision) will apply to all presidents not just Obama. the senate will never be in recess for 10 days now.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 06:21 AM   #36
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
No chimp dick you missed the point as usual you are just chimp dumb.
In the "real world", Ekim the Inbred Chimp, where everyone else lives, the year "2008" came before the year "2012".



Quote:
Originally Posted by BigLouie View Post
The bigger sham is the Republicans claiming they are in session because they have someone walk into a totally empty chamber, bang the gravel and walk out.
But you were okay with it when Odumbo and company did the same thing to Bush in 2008!?!?!




Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
No YOU missed the point!!!!!
Hasa diga, you lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.



Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
You clowns realize it (the SCOTUS decision) will apply to all presidents not just Obama. the senate will never be in recess for 10 days now.
You and Odumbo are the real clowns who do not understand that every Supreme Court justice voted to reiterate what the Constitution already says, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 06:35 AM   #37
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
In your case you are a idiot, turd fly.


You clowns realize it (the SCOTUS decision) will apply to all presidents not just Obama. the senate will never be in recess for 10 days now.
True. And that is a good thing. How does that prevent a President from hiring and firing people in his/her "department"?
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 06:51 AM   #38
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default

Every body knows what this was all about. The Presidentt had three pro-labor political hacks that he either promised a seat on the Board too or wanted them on there himself. He knew getting them through the Senate Confirmation Process would be difficult, so he did an end run.

In this particular case, he lost, and now it seems a lot of time and money will have to be spent figuring out just where this leaves all of the decisions made while these three "illegal" appointees were sitting on the board.

This is how a Narcissist and Demagogue works. He doesn't give a shit about the ramifications of his actions, he just does what he wants, and promises what he feels will garner him support among his followers.

A President is allowed to do this when over half of the Country want something for nothing, (those that "vote for a living"),and one side of the Legislative Branch is too busy kissing his ring to realize that the Constitution is being used as toilet paper.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 07:09 AM   #39
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
In the "real world", Ekim the Inbred Chimp, where everyone else lives, the year "2008" came before the year "2012".


You and Odumbo are the real clowns who do not understand that every Supreme Court justice voted to reiterate what the Constitution already says, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.
I am surprised that you have shown this much clarity chimp shit. I repeat again for the slow...This opinion applies to ALL presidents just not Obama...Get it?
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 07:10 AM   #40
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
True. And that is a good thing. How does that prevent a President from hiring and firing people in his/her "department"?
Poor choice of words on my part, should have been appoint.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 07:12 AM   #41
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
Every body knows what this was all about. The Presidentt had three pro-labor political hacks that he either promised a seat on the Board too or wanted them on there himself. He knew getting them through the Senate Confirmation Process would be difficult, so he did an end run.

In this particular case, he lost, and now it seems a lot of time and money will have to be spent figuring out just where this leaves all of the decisions made while these three "illegal" appointees were sitting on the board.

This is how a Narcissist and Demagogue works. He doesn't give a shit about the ramifications of his actions, he just does what he wants, and promises what he feels will garner him support among his followers.

A President is allowed to do this when over half of the Country want something for nothing, (those that "vote for a living"),and one side of the Legislative Branch is too busy kissing his ring to realize that the Constitution is being used as toilet paper.
You forgot to mention there were not enough on the board to do business, and the republicans want the labor relations board to disappear.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:57 PM   #42
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

According to the Constitution a president does not NOW have the right to appoint people into his government....without approval by the senate. That's the part this constitutional lawyer forgot about. The senate has a role to advise and consent to the nominees.

If you want try to use this as a veiled threat about precedence then you have to go to the root of the problem. The senate did not go into recess because Obama threatened to do what he did. If he had had the brains to keep his mouth shut the senate would have into recess and he would have had a better legal position but this guy is about posturing. Don't worry, the senate and house go into recess before they seat the incoming freshmen.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 10:16 PM   #43
RedLeg505
Oral Aficionado
 
RedLeg505's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 13, 2013
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 8,522
Encounters: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
You clowns realize it (the SCOTUS decision) will apply to all presidents not just Obama. the senate will never be in recess for 10 days now.
You mean like HARRY REID did to Bush for the last 2 or 3 years of his last term? Funny how no one had a problem with Harry Reid using the "pro forma" session tactic to stop Bush from Recess Appointing any more cabinet members, but when the Republicans did the same thing to Obama, he got all butt-hurt about it and violated the Constitution. For the supposed "Constitutional Scholar" you'd think he'd know more about it than Bush did, but NOOOOOOO. Such an egregious violation, even his two appointees voted against him. 9-0, yep, that was a partisan vote, wasn't it?
RedLeg505 is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 11:09 PM   #44
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedLeg505 View Post
You mean like HARRY REID did to Bush for the last 2 or 3 years of his last term? Funny how no one had a problem with Harry Reid using the "pro forma" session tactic to stop Bush from Recess Appointing any more cabinet members, but when the Republicans did the same thing to Obama, he got all butt-hurt about it and violated the Constitution. For the supposed "Constitutional Scholar" you'd think he'd know more about it than Bush did, but NOOOOOOO. Such an egregious violation, even his two appointees voted against him. 9-0, yep, that was a partisan vote, wasn't it?
WTF are you babbling about now? Time for your monthly?
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 11:39 PM   #45
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,919
Encounters: 67
Default

Anybody willing to bet that IBIdiot has memorized the entire libretto to at least a dozen Broadway Musicals?

This is one seriously confused motherfucker.

Were you inspired by "Silence of the Lambs?" IBIdiot? Because you fit the profile of the asshole who kept the fat girl in the pit...

The South Shall Rise Again? or.... Can you squeal like a pig, IBIDiot?

Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved