Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 393
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 277
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70748
biomed162865
Yssup Rider60548
gman4453253
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48519
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42052
CryptKicker37192
Mokoa36491
The_Waco_Kid36415
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-15-2024, 06:58 AM   #31
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
Lev17, Did you read all of your link? This is from your link:

We explain why these prion-like characteristics are more relevant to vaccine-related mRNA-induced spike proteins than natural infection with SARS-CoV-2. We note with an optimism an apparent loss of prion-like properties among the current Omicron variants. We acknowledge that the chain of pathological events described throughout this paper is only hypothetical and not yet verified. We also acknowledge that the evidence we usher in, while grounded in the research literature, is currently largely circumstantial, not direct.

What does this say?

1. Their theory is hypothetical and not yet verified.

2. Evidence is circumstatial and not direct.

3. The prion-like properties (which cause the problems) do not exist in the Omicron variants. (The Omicron variants are dominant strain right now and have been for the last year).

4. So out of 230 million people who are fully vaccinated, how many people had inflamation? The answer NO ONE. It's just a theory with no proof and does not apply to the Omicron variants.

Have a nice day.
You're putting a lot of stock into this vaccine.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 01-15-2024, 07:16 AM   #32
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
Lev17, Did you read all of your link? This is from your link:

We explain why these prion-like characteristics are more relevant to vaccine-related mRNA-induced spike proteins than natural infection with SARS-CoV-2. We note with an optimism an apparent loss of prion-like properties among the current Omicron variants. We acknowledge that the chain of pathological events described throughout this paper is only hypothetical and not yet verified. We also acknowledge that the evidence we usher in, while grounded in the research literature, is currently largely circumstantial, not direct.

What does this say?

1. Their theory is hypothetical and not yet verified.

2. Evidence is circumstatial and not direct.

3. The prion-like properties (which cause the problems) do not exist in the Omicron variants. (The Omicron variants are dominant strain right now and have been for the last year).

4. So out of 230 million people who are fully vaccinated, how many people had inflamation? The answer NO ONE. It's just a theory with no proof and does not apply to the Omicron variants.

Have a nice day.
Heres another link. It's not so much about how many vaccinated experienced inflammatory responses but what the potentials are for inflammation. As time goes on more research will be conducted on the adverse side effects of these vaccines. It's obvious these vaccines haven't been properly researched and tested prior to public use.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10145134/
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 01-15-2024, 09:59 AM   #33
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,854
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
Heres another link. It's not so much about how many vaccinated experienced inflammatory responses but what the potentials are for inflammation. As time goes on more research will be conducted on the adverse side effects of these vaccines. It's obvious these vaccines haven't been properly researched and tested prior to public use.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10145134/
Interesting, thanks, I'm going to take a look at that before getting my next COVID vaccine. After a quick scan, my two questions so far would be whether the cumulative effect of inflammation from both the disease and the vaccinations would be greater or less for those who aren't getting vaccinated. And what's the relative risk versus reward of annual COVID vaccinations for younger people versus older people. I think for people our age and older, vaccinations make a lot of sense, but am trying to keep an open mind. I'm not as sure for, say, men in their twenties who have a higher risk for myocarditis from repeatedly getting the vaccine.
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 01-15-2024, 02:13 PM   #34
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
Interesting, thanks, I'm going to take a look at that before getting my next COVID vaccine. After a quick scan, my two questions so far would be whether the cumulative effect of inflammation from both the disease and the vaccinations would be greater or less for those who aren't getting vaccinated. And what's the relative risk versus reward of annual COVID vaccinations for younger people versus older people. I think for people our age and older, vaccinations make a lot of sense, but am trying to keep an open mind. I'm not as sure for, say, men in their twenties who have a higher risk for myocarditis from repeatedly getting the vaccine.
You should of thought about it before taking your first.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 01-16-2024, 05:20 AM   #35
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,561
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
You're putting a lot of stock into this vaccine.
No, just correcting misstatements made by you and others about the M-RNA vaccine. Your link clearly says that their theories regarding the SPIKE protein from the M-RNA vaccine causing inflamation does NOT apply to the Omicron variants.

Something that you completely ignored or left out on purpose.
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 01-16-2024, 05:51 AM   #36
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,561
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
Heres another link. It's not so much about how many vaccinated experienced inflammatory responses but what the potentials are for inflammation. As time goes on more research will be conducted on the adverse side effects of these vaccines. It's obvious these vaccines haven't been properly researched and tested prior to public use.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10145134/
Moderna's clinical trials went for a year and 44,000 people were in the test group.

From section of 8 of the link where it discusses hart issues:

The mean monthly number of cases of myocarditis or myo-pericarditis during the pre-vaccine period was 16.9 vs. 27.3 during the vaccine period [74]. Myocarditis incidence after RNA vaccines is very rare (0.0035%) and has a very favorable clinical course [1]. However, not all cases are benign and critical or fatal cases have been reported [2,3,4,5]. There is an excess of cases with a substantial burden of both myocarditis and pericarditis in all ages [6]. An increased risk of myocarditis/pericarditis has been associated with the second dose of BNT162b2 and both doses of mRNA-1273 [7]. In one study, the highest risks were observed in males of 12 to 39 years [7], while Wong and colleagues [8] demonstrated that an increased risk of myocarditis or pericarditis was observed after the COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and was highest in men aged 18–25 years after a second dose of the vaccine.


Myocarditis is very rare 0.0035%. What few cases there are most are treatable with a favorable outcome.

One study indicates that men 18 - 25 have the highest risk of getting myocarditis or pericarditis.

So perhaps if you are in this age group you may not want to get the shot. Wait until you are out this age group.

Even the second link you provided does not have any show stoppers that would suggest that most people should not get the M-RNA shot.
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 01-16-2024, 06:56 AM   #37
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
Moderna's clinical trials went for a year and 44,000 people were in the test group.

From section of 8 of the link where it discusses hart issues:

The mean monthly number of cases of myocarditis or myo-pericarditis during the pre-vaccine period was 16.9 vs. 27.3 during the vaccine period [74]. Myocarditis incidence after RNA vaccines is very rare (0.0035%) and has a very favorable clinical course [1]. However, not all cases are benign and critical or fatal cases have been reported [2,3,4,5]. There is an excess of cases with a substantial burden of both myocarditis and pericarditis in all ages [6]. An increased risk of myocarditis/pericarditis has been associated with the second dose of BNT162b2 and both doses of mRNA-1273 [7]. In one study, the highest risks were observed in males of 12 to 39 years [7], while Wong and colleagues [8] demonstrated that an increased risk of myocarditis or pericarditis was observed after the COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and was highest in men aged 18–25 years after a second dose of the vaccine.


Myocarditis is very rare 0.0035%. What few cases there are most are treatable with a favorable outcome.

One study indicates that men 18 - 25 have the highest risk of getting myocarditis or pericarditis.

So perhaps if you are in this age group you may not want to get the shot. Wait until you are out this age group.

Even the second link you provided does not have any show stoppers that would suggest that most people should not get the M-RNA shot.
I am not saying don't take it. I am saying you're a fool if you do.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 01-16-2024, 07:00 AM   #38
SpeedRacerXXX
Valued Poster
 
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Georgetown, Texas
Posts: 9,303
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
You should of thought about it before taking your first.
From the beginning my belief was that a Covid vaccine was the only way to end the pandemic which would end up killing almost 7 million to date. I was right. I have never second-guessed my decision (or my wife's decision) to participate in the Pfizer vaccine study in late 2020. No praise asked for -- I did it for selfish reasons.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
SpeedRacerXXX is offline   Quote
Old 01-16-2024, 07:27 AM   #39
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX View Post
From the beginning my belief was that a Covid vaccine was the only way to end the pandemic which would end up killing almost 7 million to date. I was right. I have never second-guessed my decision (or my wife's decision) to participate in the Pfizer vaccine study in late 2020. No praise asked for -- I did it for selfish reasons.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
From the beginning I knew the Pandemic was based on fear. That's why Governments all over the world were able to convince people to wear masks and practice Social Distancing and then take a Vaccine. Now we have another aspect of polarization. People judge others whether they are vaccinated or not. I can't wait to see what their next move is.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 01-16-2024, 07:31 AM   #40
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,548
Encounters: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
I am not saying don't take it. I am saying you're a fool if you do.
Like the GA Election case thread, this is another waste of bandwidth.

Same old arguments debunked by fact and statistics.

Yet on the argument rages….

Levi. I truly hope you or anybody else doesn’t get sick with COVID.

But to paraphrase your very own statement, you’re a fool if you do. Actually, based on the amount of time you spend ruminating on this subject, I’d say you may already be there.

Time to retire this tired old argument. Shirley, there’s something else you can obsess over.
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 01-16-2024, 07:35 AM   #41
SpeedRacerXXX
Valued Poster
 
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Georgetown, Texas
Posts: 9,303
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
From the beginning I knew the Pandemic was based on fear. That's why Governments all over the world were able to convince people to wear masks and practice Social Distancing and then take a Vaccine. Now we have another aspect of polarization. People judge others whether they are vaccinated or not. I can't wait to see what their next move is.
Totally untrue.

Your decision was, and still is, to not take the Covid vaccine based on false information that a handful of uneducated people still believe. I am fine with that decision. But your continued belief that the more than 80% of the people in this country who have received the vaccine made the wrong decision is made from stupidity of the facts.
SpeedRacerXXX is offline   Quote
Old 01-16-2024, 07:49 AM   #42
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,561
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
I am not saying don't take it. I am saying you're a fool if you do.
You are like Aaron Rogers, the quarterback of the NY jets. You like to play games with words.

"Jimmy Kimmel should be concerned about the Epstein list". Aaron Rogers " I didn't say Jimmy Kimmel will be on the Epstein list"


What are the 1 million unvaccinated people who died from/with CoVid infection. Are they smart, but unlucky?
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 01-16-2024, 08:07 AM   #43
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
You are like Aaron Rogers, the quarterback of the NY jets. You like to play games with words.

"Jimmy Kimmel should be concerned about the Epstein list". Aaron Rogers " I didn't say Jimmy Kimmel will be on the Epstein list"


What are the 1 million unvaccinated people who died from/with CoVid infection. Are they smart, but unlucky?
One Million people didn't die from Covid so cut the stupid bullshit.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 01-16-2024, 08:16 AM   #44
SpeedRacerXXX
Valued Poster
 
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Georgetown, Texas
Posts: 9,303
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28
You are like Aaron Rogers, the quarterback of the NY jets. You like to play games with words.

"Jimmy Kimmel should be concerned about the Epstein list". Aaron Rogers " I didn't say Jimmy Kimmel will be on the Epstein list"

What are the 1 million unvaccinated people who died from/with CoVid infection. Are they smart, but unlucky?
One Million people didn't die from Covid so cut the stupid bullshit.

As with most statements made by Trump supporters, everyone else must be lying in order for you to be correct. Do you have anything at all other than your opinion to support your statements regarding Covid?

https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tra...tatracker-home
SpeedRacerXXX is offline   Quote
Old 01-16-2024, 08:37 AM   #45
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,561
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28
You are like Aaron Rogers, the quarterback of the NY jets. You like to play games with words.

"Jimmy Kimmel should be concerned about the Epstein list". Aaron Rogers " I didn't say Jimmy Kimmel will be on the Epstein list"

What are the 1 million unvaccinated people who died from/with CoVid infection. Are they smart, but unlucky?
One Million people didn't die from Covid so cut the stupid bullshit.
According to this link which has real time pandemic data from all 50 states. In the USA there were 100 million people who got infected. There were 1.1 million deaths. If you don't like there numbers take it up with them. Plus, provide a link that backs up what you say.

https://usafacts.org/visualizations/...19-spread-map/
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved