CNN poll: Two-thirds want to stay in Iran nuclear deal

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Yes. The ones who count, who were betrayed by the last administration, and who publicly proclaimed their "support" out of fear the last administration didn't have "their backs"!

And the last administration DIDN'T "have their backs"!

Remember: "I can be more flexible after the election."

You think that mic was open only to the U.S. media?

And don't you think they heard Rev. Wright who was his preacher who he failed to dismiss and from whom he failed to distance himself ... as he and his wife trashed this country? Not only did he trash the West, but the U.S.

What did that idiot babble have to do with anything?
Other than you don't know anything, so you just babble.

[bamscram]

What are you saying iffylube, if Obama did it then it is alright for Trump.

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Everyone should read this...

http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...administration

Iffylube, from your link. We sold them some commercial Uranium, not weapons grade. The only thing Russia can do with it is heat their homes. No need for the outrage.

In 2011, the administration gave approval for Rosatom’s Tenex subsidiary to sell commercial uranium to U.S. nuclear power plants in a partnership with the United States Enrichment Corp. Before then, Tenex had been limited to selling U.S. nuclear power plants reprocessed uranium recovered from dismantled Soviet nuclear weapons under the 1990s Megatons to Megawatts peace program.

Btw, isn't Putkin our friend? He helped Trump get elected right?

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

We know for a fact that North Korea has the means to produce fissionable Uranium, or Plutonium, because they have already exploded several Fission Bombs.

The Iranians are at least as capable. It's a large Country. It's not a 3d World Shithole.

Yes, it take a massive infrastructure to produce fissionable material. But given the fact that North Korea, ( and possibly a few other Countries), are willing to aid Iran, I would say they are within a few years of having enough to manufacture enough 20 kiloton Fission bombs to hold the World hostage.

Keep in mind. Once you have a Fission Bomb, the next step to building a true Thermo Nuclear Device becomes much easier. Then, you aren't talking kilotons, you're talking megatons.

Jackie, Iran had enriched Uranium to a weapons grade concentration before the USA signed the Iran nuclear deal. Iran had to give up their U235 at 20% concentration before we gave them their money back. The most efficient centrifuges are deactivated and moved to a facility that is being monitored 24/7 in real time. Trump has signed a document stating that Iran is in compliance with the deal, not once but twice since he took office. I agree with you on North Korea, they are further along and have weapons grade U235/ Plutonium.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by bamscram

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLjwEodCmT4

Bust the deal, face the wheel.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

You don't have an once of proof that we gave Russia "weapons grade U235". Uranium ore in the ground is only .07% U235 composition. It take years of enrichment to get the concentration to 20% (which is weapons grade). The uranium that Russia got from the USA could only be used to heat their homes, not put into a nuclear missile.

"Years", flighty? It's been years, and the U.S. went from zilch to nuclear capable in six years (1939 to 1945), flighty.

Iran and North Korea's nuclear trade
Sunday 28 November 2010 13.21 EST

The US insisted that China act "urgently" to halt a transshipment of ballistic missile components from North Korea to Iran via Beijing and complained that at least 10 similar missile-related deliveries had been allowed to proceed unhindered.

The US also accused Chinese firms in May last year of supplying Iran with a key chemical weapons precursor and assistance with operating a chemical manufacturing plant.

(The Guardian)

[cptjohnstone]

Originally Posted by bamscram

What did that idiot babble have to do with anything?
Other than you don't know anything, so you just babble.

says the king of "babble"

go post some cat pic's you pussy

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by cptjohnstone

says the king of "babble"

go post some cat pic's you pussy

Did you see your shadow? Will we have six more weeks of summer?
If you want dick pics PM dildo.

[goodman0422]

In the summer of 2001, an AOL poll said most Americans did not believe there was any threat to the US from internationaL terrorism. In other works, polls have been wrong before
(Re ember the 2016 election? I do. I DVR'ed and I watch the CNN coverage every time I need a laugh.)

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bamscram

What did that idiot babble have to do with anything?
Other than you don't know anything, so you just babble.

Speaking of "babble" ... when you have nothing to contribute ...

... you regurgitate shit like your comment above!

You sound like WTF, AssUp, and Speedo all wrapped in one stupid taco!

Eccie needs an education quiz for posting in the Political Forum.

That would knock you guys out of the forum.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by goodman0422

In the summer of 2001, an AOL poll said most Americans did not believe there was any threat to the US from internationaL terrorism. In other works, polls have been wrong before
(Re ember the 2016 election? I do. I DVR'ed and I watch the CNN coverage every time I need a laugh.)

The 2016 election "polls" started when Trump announced!

But goofballs on here keep posting "poll" bullshit!!!!!

And he keeps laughing his ass off ...

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Speaking of "babble" ... when you have nothing to contribute ...

... you regurgitate shit like your comment above!

You sound like WTF, AssUp, and Speedo all wrapped in one stupid taco!

Eccie needs an education quiz for posting in the Political Forum.

That would knock you guys out of the forum.

Your opinions aren't worth anything.

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

"Years", flighty? It's been years, and the U.S. went from zilch to nuclear capable in six years (1939 to 1945), flighty.

Russia got the commercial Uranium. We didn't give them the "weapons grade concentration". There is a big difference between the two. Slightly enriched Uranium can be put into a reactor to be used to heat buildings. It gets pretty cold over there in Russia.

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Don't believe

General Mattis believes it and has advised Trump to stay in the deal.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

Russia got the commercial Uranium. We didn't give them the "weapons grade concentration". There is a big difference between the two. Slightly enriched Uranium can be put into a reactor to be used to heat buildings. It gets pretty cold over there in Russia.

Untrue, flighty. FDR's man Harry Hopkins gave the Soviets weapons grade uranium under the provisions of the Lend Lease Act, flighty. Furthermore, flighty, I said it was the "U.S." that created weapons grade uranium in six years -- not the "U.S.S.R."

ATOMIC MATERIALS
Beryllium metals
Cadmium alloys
Cadmium metals
Cobalt ore & concentrate
Cobalt metal & Cobalt bearing scrap
Uranium metal
Aluminun tubes (for reactors)
Graphite, nat., flake, lump or chip
Beryllium salts & compounds
Cadmium oxide
Cadmium salts & compounds, n.e.s. *
Cadmium sulfate
Cadmium sulfide
Cobalt nitrate
Cobalt oxide
Cobalt salts & compounds, n.e.s.
Cobaltic and cobaltous sulfate
Deuterium oxide (heavy water)