The Mueller report

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by Hotrod511

This seems to be all you are doing

Wrong I’m stating facts. Volume ll pg/ 41-42 describes trump instructions to Prebius to ask KT McFarland to falsify a document in regards to Flynn’s conversations with the fat Russian Kisliak. KT McFarland refused to do so.

The lord of the flies was in obstruction mode before he fired Comey. Read it for yourself!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Wrong I’m stating facts. Volume ll pg/ 41-42 describes trump instructions to Prebius to ask KT McFarland to falsify a document in regards to Flynn’s conversations with the fat Russian Kisliak. KT McFarland refused to do so.

The lord of the flies was in obstruction mode before he fired Comey. Read it for yourself!

RE: the Mueller Report. Here's a fact you keep missing.

"Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I [AG Barr] have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."

(NYT)

[Hotrod511]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Wrong I’m stating facts. Volume ll pg/ 41-42 describes trump instructions to Prebius to ask KT McFarland to falsify a document in regards to Flynn’s conversations with the fat Russian Kisliak. KT McFarland refused to do so.

The lord of the flies was in obstruction mode before he fired Comey. Read it for yourself!

What facts the same ones that Adam (pencil neck schitt) has

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by Hotrod511

What facts the same ones that Adam (pencil neck schitt) has

Who’s facts are you using Handjob Hanitys ?
Here’s a fact, Putin’s punk can be impeached for abuse of power and no crime has to be committed, but he has committed obstruction on more than one occasion. He lied about Flynn’s contacts, fired Comey over the Russia investigation, fired Sessions because he wouldn’t un-recuse and get rid of Mueller and open investigations on HRC.

CNN was reporting the truth while the Orange one screamed “Fake News”

[Jaxson66]

Here’s some interesting reading
Volume ll pages 113-114




The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the
Special Counsel .............................. .............................. .............................. ................ 113
1. _The Press Reports that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel............. 113
2. The President Seeks to Have McGahn Dispute the Press Reports ..................... 114

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Who’s facts are you using Handjob Hanitys ?
Here’s a fact, Putin’s punk can be impeached for abuse of power and no crime has to be committed, but he has committed obstruction on more than one occasion. He lied about Flynn’s contacts, fired Comey over the Russia investigation, fired Sessions because he wouldn’t un-recuse and get rid of Mueller and open investigations on HRC.

CNN was reporting the truth while the Orange one screamed “Fake News”

yet Mueller could not build a case. forget that OLC policy. if Mueller could have made a case he would have. he failed to do so. now he's being shown up by Barr for the partisan hack he is. editing transcripts to imply obstruction when there was none. his so-called 10 instances of obstruction are worthless when you show the full transcripts that are now available.

Mueller does not want to testify because he will have to lie if he does. so have him testify. let the Dems go drag him into a hearing. he'll take the 5th every time.

your case for impeachment is over. it never existed to begin with and Mueller's attempt to misrepresent the facts has failed.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

They speak of trump’s attempt to have Maghan create a false document and Combover Caligula also instructed Prebius to have KT McFarland do the same.

Never heard of "Maghan". Or "Prebius". Neither one is mentioned in the Mueller report.

Wanna try again, jaxboy?

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Never heard of "Maghan". Or "Prebius". Neither one is mentioned in the Mueller report.

Wanna try again, jaxboy?

As I recall the Orange one was pissing and moaning Fake News as he did this AM about protesters in London. He can’t go day without lying..

Volume 2/ pg 118
The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel

Overview
In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead. After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel. Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President's effort to have the Special Counsel removed. The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the ChiefofStaffpresent and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel. McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President's direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate. In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

yet Mueller could not build a case. forget that OLC policy. if Mueller could have made a case he would have. he failed to do so. now he's being shown up by Barr for the partisan hack he is. editing transcripts to imply obstruction when there was none. his so-called 10 instances of obstruction are worthless when you show the full transcripts that are now available.

Mueller does not want to testify because he will have to lie if he does. so have him testify. let the Dems go drag him into a hearing. he'll take the 5th every time.

your case for impeachment is over. it never existed to begin with and Mueller's attempt to misrepresent the facts has failed.

Hell yeah let’s have some hearings. But the committees can’t because a certain so called president is in obstruction mode by challenging each and every subpoena and losing in the courts. I’d wager it’s Don jr taking the 5th.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Hell yeah let’s have some hearings. But the committees can’t because a certain so called president is in obstruction mode by challenging each and every subpoena and losing in the courts. I’d wager it’s Don jr taking the 5th.

There already has been hearings. Trump provided over a million documents and let everyone testify. Didn’t claim executive privilege. Impeachment is a fools errand. Do you put cookies out for Santa Clause down at the fire hall? You’ll have a better chance of seeing him one Christmas.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Never heard of "Maghan". Or "Prebius". Neither one is mentioned in the Mueller report.

Wanna try again, jaxboy?

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

As I recall the Orange one was pissing and moaning Fake News as he did this AM about protesters in London. He can’t go day without lying..

Volume 2/ pg 118
The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel

Overview
In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead. After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel. Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President's effort to have the Special Counsel removed. The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the ChiefofStaffpresent and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel. McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President's direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate. In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed.

???

Still no mention of "Maghan" or "Prebius".

Wanna try again, jaxboy?

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by lustylad

???

Still no mention of "Maghan" or "Prebius".

Wanna try again, jaxboy?

Well, with all the people the Orange one has involved in his criminal behavior it’s likely I will misspell many more names. I’m out of practice but I’m certain you understood who I was referring to.Boy



Volume ll page 120

c. Intent. Substantial evidence indicates that in repeatedly urging McGahn to dispute that he was ordered to have the Special Counsel terminated, the President acted for the purpose of influencing McGahn's account in order to deflect or prevent further scrutiny of the President's conduct towards the investigation.
Several facts support that conclusion. The President made repeated attempts to get McGahn to change his story. As described above, by the time of the last attempt, the evidence suggests that the President had been told on multiple occasions that McGahn believed the President had ordered him to have the Special Counsel terminated. McGahn interpreted his encounter with the President in the Oval Office as an attempt to test his mettle and see how committed he was to his memory of what had occurred. The President had already laid the groundwork for pressing McGahn to alter his account by telling Porter that it might be necessary to fire McGahn if he did not deny the story, and Porter relayed that statement to McGahn. Additional evidence of the President's intent may be gleaned from the fact that his counsel was sufficiently alarmed by the prospect ofthe President's meeting with McGahn that he called McGahn's counsel and said that McGahn could not resign no matter what happened in the Oval Office that day. The President's counsel was well aware ofMcGahn's resolve not to issue what he believed to be a false account of events despite the President's request. Finally, as noted above, the President brought up the Special Counsel investigation in his Oval Office meeting with McGahn and criticized him for telling this Office about the June 17, 2017 events. The President's statements reflect his understanding-and his displeasure-that those events would be part of an obstruction-of-justice mqmry.

[I B Hankering]

Odumbo's former White House counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler, is defending George Nader who was one of Mueller's primary ~sources~ and who was arrested coincidentally for possession of especially vile pornography. It appears that with those kind of charges hanging over Nader's head, all Mueller and Weissmann had to do was write the lyrics to the tune they wanted Nader to sing -- a three part harmony: Mueller, Weissmann and Ruemmler.

Mr. Nader received partial immunity in exchange for his testimony, and he ended up spending hours before a grand jury being questioned by prosecutors working for the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III.

(NYT)

[Lantern2814]

Since it's now coming out that Mueller was doctoring transcripts (tampering with/withholding evidence isn't new to him), doubt can now be cast on every one of his allegations on obstruction. He wasn't obstructed and would get laughed out of court for even considering bringing this case to court. No wonder he's afraid to testify. Barr would hammer him for perjury just like anybody else.

[Hotrod511]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

yet Mueller could not build a case. forget that OLC policy. if Mueller could have made a case he would have. he failed to do so. now he's being shown up by Barr for the partisan hack he is. editing transcripts to imply obstruction when there was none. his so-called 10 instances of obstruction are worthless when you show the full transcripts that are now available.

Mueller does not want to testify because he will have to lie if he does. so have him testify. let the Dems go drag him into a hearing. he'll take the 5th every time.

your case for impeachment is over. it never existed to begin with and Mueller's attempt to misrepresent the facts has failed.

Originally Posted by bambino

There already has been hearings. Trump provided over a million documents and let everyone testify. Didn’t claim executive privilege. Impeachment is a fools errand. Do you put cookies out for Santa Clause down at the fire hall? You’ll have a better chance of seeing him one Christmas.

Originally Posted by lustylad

???

Still no mention of "Maghan" or "Prebius".

Wanna try again, jaxboy?

you all may as well be






he really doesn't understand