Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
649 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
397 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
280 |
George Spelvin |
267 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70798 | biomed1 | 63388 | Yssup Rider | 61077 | gman44 | 53297 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48710 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 42878 | The_Waco_Kid | 37233 | CryptKicker | 37224 | Mokoa | 36496 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
06-01-2019, 07:35 PM
|
#361
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
There is a real possibility that impeaching Trump could blow up in the Democrat's feces.
can't wait to see who's right.
|
FTFY
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
06-01-2019, 08:57 PM
|
#362
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
The parts that Team Mueller edited out more than indicate the bias of Team Mueller and their intent to smear Trump. Mueller's bullshit is simply hildebeest's bullshit rewarmed for hildebeest minion's to suckle on and swallow.
|
Don’t forget collusion isn’t a crime and proving conspiracy with that lame ass theory is ridiculous. Nunes needed a distraction to divert the Cult 45 members away from the fact the DOJ refused a court order.
In the immortal words of the self proclaimed stable genius “ we’ll see what happens “
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-01-2019, 09:03 PM
|
#363
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66
Don’t forget collusion isn’t a crime and proving conspiracy with that lame ass theory is ridiculous. Nunes needed a distraction to divert the Cult 45 members away from the fact the DOJ refused a court order.
In the immortal words of the self proclaimed stable genius “ we’ll see what happens “
|
It's hildebeest's dim-retard minions that are being distracted away from the facts -- it's been that way since 2016.
Where's Adam Shitty's ~proof~? But after two years of his lies, you still believe in him.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-01-2019, 09:08 PM
|
#364
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28
What about the republican congressman from Michigan? He doesn't mean anything either, right? Why does Pelosi want to hear from Maghan? Are you afraid to hear about that "Stupid Sh*t" that Trump requested him to do?
There is a real possibility that Trump could be impeached.
|
A Republican group is hand-delivering special counsel Robert Mueller's report to every lawmaker in its party on the heels of his first public remarks on the two-year Russia investigation.
Republicans for the Rule of Law announced Thursday it will deliver a copy of the report with highlighted sections to Republicans in Congress.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-01-2019, 09:24 PM
|
#365
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,639
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino
Amash is as much as a Republican as Bernie Sanders is a Democrat. So it won’t happen.
|
You probably meant to write independent instead of democrat. Bernie is on the same page as AOC with their views on healthcare and "free college".
If impeachment is "off the table" then why bother with bringing in Maghan? Maghan is just one of the ten examples of obstruction in the report. If Trump has nothing to worry about with Maghan, then why won't Trump let him testify?
They may want to prove at least a couple of those examples, instead of just one. If they can impeachment just might happen.
You like to predict outcomes. Did you predict that Obama was going to beat Romney by 5 million votes?
Political consultant Dick Weiss of didn't so Fox fired him along with Sarah airhead Palin.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-02-2019, 07:36 AM
|
#366
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28
...If Trump has nothing to worry about with Maghan, then why won't Trump let him testify? ...
|
Hold that thought until you get accused of something you didn't do!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-02-2019, 10:05 AM
|
#367
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 42,878
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28
You probably meant to write independent instead of democrat. Bernie is on the same page as AOC with their views on healthcare and "free college".
If impeachment is "off the table" then why bother with bringing in Maghan? Maghan is just one of the ten examples of obstruction in the report. If Trump has nothing to worry about with Maghan, then why won't Trump let him testify?
They may want to prove at least a couple of those examples, instead of just one. If they can impeachment just might happen.
You like to predict outcomes. Did you predict that Obama was going to beat Romney by 5 million votes?
Political consultant Dick Weiss of didn't so Fox fired him along with Sarah airhead Palin.
|
In case you haven’t noticed, Sanders is running again as a DEMOCRAT, not an Independent. Amash has said he wouldn’t stand a chance of winning his district as an Independent. Now the he outed himself, I doubt he will win again. Magahn testified for 30 hours to Mueller. It’s in the report. The DOJ ruled no obstruction. As a legal matter, case closed.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
06-02-2019, 11:53 AM
|
#368
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino
The DOJ ruled no obstruction. As a legal matter, case closed.
|
Isn't that what Comey did right before the 2016 election re HillariousNoMore?
Perhaps I should have written .... "tried to do" instead of "did"!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-02-2019, 02:43 PM
|
#369
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
|
As I recall the Orange one was pissing and moaning Fake News
Volume 2/ pg 118
The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
Overview
In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead. After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel. Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President's effort to have the Special Counsel removed. The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the ChiefofStaffpresent and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel. McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President's direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate. In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-02-2019, 04:18 PM
|
#370
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
"Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I [AG Barr] have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."
(NYT)
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-02-2019, 10:27 PM
|
#371
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,935
|
Quote:
The historical record categorically refutes the idea that the American revolutionaries gave their new president an unspecified array of royal prerogatives. To the contrary, the presidency that leaps off the pages of the Founders’ debates, diaries, speeches, letters, poems, and essays was an instrument of the law of the land, subject to the law of the land, and both morally (?) and legally obliged to obey the law of the land.
|
Dershowitz to prove we have a kaiser?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-02-2019, 10:36 PM
|
#372
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,935
|
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
06-03-2019, 12:03 AM
|
#373
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 11, 2019
Location: United States
Posts: 3,622
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gfejunkie
|
best post!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-03-2019, 09:26 AM
|
#374
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
|
They speak of trump’s attempt to have Maghan create a false document and Combover Caligula also instructed Prebius to have KT McFarland do the same.
KT McFarland refused to do so.
When CNN and others where reporting the story trump was screaming “ Fake News.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-03-2019, 05:07 PM
|
#375
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 9, 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 2,354
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66
As I recall the Orange one was pissing and moaning Fake News
Volume 2/ pg 118
The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
Overview
In late January 2018, the media reported that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel fired based on purported conflicts of interest but McGahn had refused, saying he would quit instead. After the story broke, the President, through his personal counsel and two aides, sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel. Each time he was approached, McGahn responded that he would not refute the press accounts because they were accurate in reporting on the President's effort to have the Special Counsel removed. The President later personally met with McGahn in the Oval Office with only the ChiefofStaffpresent and tried to get McGahn to say that the President never ordered him to fire the Special Counsel. McGahn refused and insisted his memory of the President's direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate. In that same meeting, the President challenged McGahn for taking notes of his discussions with the President and asked why he had told Special Counsel investigators that he had been directed to have the Special Counsel removed.
|
This seems to be all you are doing
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|