The Mueller report

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Patience, grasshopper.

Mueller only looked at half the story.

Will you "stay on topic" when the Horowitz report comes out, followed by the Huber report, followed by the Durham report??

That "deep state conspiracy bullshit" is getting deeper every day.

You start the thread and I sure will. I don’t usually post on deep state threads because of the bullshit but when the report comes out I’ll get in to it.

Yep, the deep state bullshit is getting deeper every day!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by bambino

Eddie Munster doesn’t mean shit. The Mueller investigation is closed. Barr, Rosenstein and the Office of legal counsel has ruled no obstruction. As the law goes, that’s the final word. You and others can’t seem to accept that fact. Pelosi doesn’t want to start impeachment proceedings because she knows that would sink her ship. That’s the reality of things.

Only in the head of a delusional lib-retard can the protests of an innocent man publicly protesting his innocence against substantively false charges of committing a fake crime be considered "obstruction".

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Yep, and nine hundred former Odumbo and hildebeest parasites believe trump did commit Obstruction and if he wasn’t president he would be indicted.

FTFY

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

You start the thread and I sure will. I don’t usually post on deep state threads because of the bullshit but when the report comes out I’ll get in to it.

Yep, the deep state bullshit is getting deeper every day!

You were saying the same thing about the Mueller report. It's out. It's done. You were wrong.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by bambino

Pelosi doesn’t want to start impeachment proceedings because she knows that would sink her ship. That’s the reality of things.

impeachment may not be in the cards but... censure could be used instead. there's enough republicans in the senate who don't like trump could spring for the censure.



Last president to get censured was Andrew Jackson.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

impeachment may not be in the cards but... censure could be used instead. there's enough republicans in the senate who don't like trump could spring for the censure.



Last president to get censured was Andrew Jackson.

The Dems already brought two censure resolutions in the House against Trump. They went nowhere.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cens..._United_States

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by bambino

The Dems already brought two censure resolutions in the House against Trump. They went nowhere.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cens..._United_States

yeah but the first one was under the republican control. then 2nd one was on the 1st day of democrat control.


they'll bring it up in 2020. they'll use it to tar and feather Trump with Meulers report.


It didn't work in Andrew Jackson's case as he got re-elected inspite of a censure.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

yeah but the first one was under the republican control. then 2nd one was on the 1st day of democrat control.


they'll bring it up in 2020. they'll use it to tar and feather Trump with Meulers report.


It didn't work in Andrew Jackson's case as he got re-elected inspite of a censure.

McConnell wouldn’t bring it up in the Senate. Anything the Dems do will be viewed as a partisan attack. It would be meaningless. But the Dems are good at meaningless efforts.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

yeah but the first one was under the republican control. then 2nd one was on the 1st day of democrat control.


they'll bring it up in 2020. they'll use it to tar and feather Trump with Meulers report.


It didn't work in Andrew Jackson's case as he got re-elected inspite of a censure.

McConnell wouldn’t bring it up in the Senate. Anything the Dems do will be viewed as a partisan attack. It would be meaningless. But the Dems are good at meaningless efforts.

[the_real_Barleycorn]

According to libtard philosophy and SJW creed, there are no innocent people. We are all guilty of not only our sins but the sins of our fathers and any other imagined slight that we might be suspected of. The libtards know themselves to be guilty and think everyone else is just as guilty.

[Jaxson66]

Is Dodd offering a bribe to Flynn or just sympathetic....

Read the voicemail here:

Hey, Rob, uhm, this is John again. Uh, maybe, I-I-I’m-I’m sympathetic; I understand your situation, but let me see if I can’t … state it in … starker terms. If you have … and it wouldn’t surprise me if you’ve gone on to make a deal with, and, uh, work with the government, uh … I understand that you can’t join the joint defense; so that’s one thing. If, on the other hand, we have, there’s information that. .. implicates the President, then we’ve got a national security issue, or maybe a national security issue, I don’t know … some issue, we got to-we got to deal with, not only for the President, but for the country. So … uh … you know, then-then, you know, we need some kind of heads up. Um, just for the sake of … protecting all our interests, if we can, without you having to give up any … confidential information. So, uhm, and if it’s the former, then, you know, remember what we’ve always said about the President and his feelings toward Flynn and, that still remains, but-Well, in any event, uhm, let me know, and, uh, I appreciate your listening and taking the time. Thanks, Pal.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Is Dodd offering a bribe to Flynn or just sympathetic....

Read the voicemail here:

Hey, Rob, uhm, this is John again. Uh, maybe, I-I-I’m-I’m sympathetic; I understand your situation, but let me see if I can’t … state it in … starker terms. If you have … and it wouldn’t surprise me if you’ve gone on to make a deal with, and, uh, work with the government, uh … I understand that you can’t join the joint defense; so that’s one thing. If, on the other hand, we have, there’s information that. .. implicates the President, then we’ve got a national security issue, or maybe a national security issue, I don’t know … some issue, we got to-we got to deal with, not only for the President, but for the country. So … uh … you know, then-then, you know, we need some kind of heads up. Um, just for the sake of … protecting all our interests, if we can, without you having to give up any … confidential information. So, uhm, and if it’s the former, then, you know, remember what we’ve always said about the President and his feelings toward Flynn and, that still remains, but-Well, in any event, uhm, let me know, and, uh, I appreciate your listening and taking the time. Thanks, Pal.

But that's not what the fuck Mueller and Weissmann quoted in their fucking report. They edited the message to smear Trump.

Mueller’s Report Is A ‘Fraud’ To Target Trump. Transcripts Suggest He Purposefully Left Out Information.
By Sara Carter - June 1, 2019

Ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee Devin Nunes called Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report is a “fraud” citing the investigators conveniently left information out of the report to make it appear President Trump’s counsel may have been obstructing justice.

The newly released transcripts were from a voicemail message left by Trump’s former lawyer John Dowd to National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s lawyer Robert Kelner.

Mueller’s team made it appear in the Special Counsel’s report that Dowd was asking for a “heads up” if Flynn planned to say anything damaging about Trump, alluding to possible ‘obstruction’ by his counsel. However, now that the full transcripts have been formerly released by a court order it appears to be all-together different. In fact, it appears that Mueller weaponized the transcript. What I mean is that Mueller left out the most significant parts of the message to make it appear that Dowd (who represented Trump) was attempting to obstruct the investigation.

Mueller had redacted two significant portions of the voicemail message transcript, which according to numerous critics, reveal there was no intention of obstruction. In fact, as Trump’s attorney Dowd was only doing his job.

Nunes tweeted a side-by-side comparison of the Dowd transcript text Saturday and the Mueller report text. It shows that the Mueller report did not disclose Dowd’s full message.

And there’s a reason why – it would’ve taken the steam out of Mueller’s second half of his report that there was a possibility of “obstruction.” There was no obstruction.

In the report full version of Dowd’s voicemail it says he wants the heads up “not only for the president but for the country.” He also specifically stated that he did not want “any confidential information.” Conveniently, Mueller kept those two significant statements out of the report using an ellipsis (… so it makes one wonder how many other convenient factors were left out of the Special Counsel’s report.)

Here’s what the Mueller report [p. 333] quoted from the voicemail:

“I understand your situation, but let me see if I can't state it in starker terms.... [I]t wouldn't surprise me if you've gone on to make a deal with ... the government.... [I]f.... there's information that implicates the President, then we've got a national security issue… so, you know ... we need some kind of heads up. Um, just for the sake of protecting all our interests if we can....” The phone call took place in November 2017.

Here’s what the full transcript says:



So let’s take a closer look at this:

• First Muller leaves out that Dowd wanted a heads up “not only for the president, but for the country” as stated by Nunes and others reporting on the matter.
  
  
• Secondly, and most importantly, he emphatically states he is not asking “any confidential information.”

This is why we need all backup and source documentation for the #muellerdossier released publicly. It’s all a fraud… https://t.co/wMjRkHJ5j4

— Devin Nunes (@DevinNunes) June 1, 2019

(Sara Carter)

[Jaxson66]

David Nunes is probably a major in the Freedom Caucus for his deep state conspiracy bullshit. Yeah, that’s right some parts are omitted, Big deal, that’s old news, Volume 2 page 120 wasn’t even redacted to begin with.

I’m thinking the name Nunes has been redacted from the report.

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by bambino

Eddie Munster doesn’t mean shit. Pelosi doesn’t want to start impeachment proceedings because she knows that would sink her ship.

What about the republican congressman from Michigan? He doesn't mean anything either, right? Why does Pelosi want to hear from Maghan? Are you afraid to hear about that "Stupid Sh*t" that Trump requested him to do?

There is a real possibility that Trump could be impeached.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

David Nunes is probably a major in the Freedom Caucus for his deep state conspiracy bullshit. Yeah, that’s right some parts are omitted, Big deal, that’s old news, Volume 2 page 120 wasn’t even redacted to begin with.

I’m thinking the name Nunes has been redacted from the report.

The parts that Team Mueller edited out more than indicate the bias of Team Mueller and their intent to smear Trump. Mueller's bullshit is simply hildebeest's bullshit rewarmed for hildebeest minion's to suckle on and swallow.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

What about the republican congressman from Michigan? He doesn't mean anything either, right? Why does Pelosi want to hear from Maghan? Are you afraid to hear about that "Stupid Sh*t" that Trump requested him to do?

There is a real possibility that Trump could be impeached.

Amash is as much as a Republican as Bernie Sanders is a Democrat. Let’s see him win again in his district. It won’t be as a Republican. So he doesn’t mean shit. The people who matter are the 31 moderate Democrats that won in districts that Trump carried. Without them, Pelosi wouldn’t be speaker. So it won’t happen.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

What about the republican congressman from Michigan? He doesn't mean anything either, right? Why does Pelosi want to hear from Maghan? Are you afraid to hear about that "Stupid Sh*t" that Trump requested him to do?

There is a real possibility that Trump could be impeached.

There is a real possibility that impeaching Trump could blow up in the Democrat's faces.

can't wait to see who's right.