Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex
LLIdiot, would you prefer that I not refer to you and your identical twins (JDIdiot & IBIdiot) by your given names?
|
That is not the subject of this thread: This is on topic of your WHINING:
So, BigTitsLiar .... you "believe" the weapons inspectors were just supposed to be looking for nuclear weapons and that is what THE U.N. REQUIRED ...
"and to ratify the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, of 10 April 1972"
and let's not forget ...
the Geneva Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925,
in the ..
RESOLUTION 687 (1991)
Adopted by the Security Council at its 2981st meeting, on 3 April 1991
But you, BigTitsLiar" ... "believe" it was ONLY ABOUT NUCLEAR WEAPONS?
Again, and you have the audacity to call any one an "idiot" .... ??
BitTisLIAR fits you to a "T"!
Here is your LIE...
"My argument all along has been (and still remains) that there would have been justification for an invasion had there been conclusive evidence indicating that Iraq had the capability to manufacture nuclear weapons at the time. And quite frankly, that is the specific reason the UN Inspectors were in place during the months leading up to the ill fated and ill advised, spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq. The Weapons Inspectors were there specifically to determine whether Iraq had nuclear capability at the time. There was no other reason for them to be in place during the weeks and months leading up to the spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq."
Anyone betting with a lying sack of shit like you deserves to lose their money. "AIRBORNE"!!!!
