Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
408 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Starscream66 |
290 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
George Spelvin |
287 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
sharkman29 |
261 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 71125 | biomed1 | 65757 | Yssup Rider | 61777 | gman44 | 54229 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 49205 | WTF | 48272 | pyramider | 46397 | bambino | 43606 | The_Waco_Kid | 38631 | CryptKicker | 37345 | Mokoa | 36498 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33118 |
|
|
11-10-2019, 08:04 AM
|
#316
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
|
Steve Bannon, under oath, says Roger Stone was WikiLeaks' "access point" to Trump campaign
... when Bannon was asked why he emailed Stone on Oct 4, 2016 — the date WikiLeaks announced the dump of Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta's emails — Bannon replied, "Because Roger was the guy who knew about WikiLeaks and knew Julian Assange."
In the era of the most corrupt administration in history is Perjury even a crime. If so the fat lying bastard will have to defend his written responses to Mueller.
It ain’t over till it’s over.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 08:35 AM
|
#317
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 24, 2014
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66
Steve Bannon, under oath, says Roger Stone was WikiLeaks' "access point" to Trump campaign
... when Bannon was asked why he emailed Stone on Oct 4, 2016 — the date WikiLeaks announced the dump of Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta's emails — Bannon replied, "Because Roger was the guy who knew about WikiLeaks and knew Julian Assange."
In the era of the most corrupt administration in history is Perjury even a crime. If so the fat lying bastard will have to defend his written responses to Mueller.
It ain’t over till it’s over.
|
Stop the babbling and explain what you are trying to say.
What Perjury? What crime?
Lots of innuendo, no substance, which reflects the left's actions to a tee.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 08:52 AM
|
#318
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by eccielover
Stop the babbling and explain what you are trying to say.
What Perjury? What crime?
Lots of innuendo, no substance, which reflects the left's actions to a tee.
|
Do your own homework and read the written answers of the fat lying bastard asked in writing by the Mueller team. I doubt you will, I suspect you’ll wait for one the fat lying bastards propaganda barkers to give you your opinion.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 09:09 AM
|
#319
|
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 7, 2019
Location: North
Posts: 3,942
|
Looks like the handwriting is on the wall. Just that moist of you can’t read.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 11:33 AM
|
#320
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 24, 2014
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66
Do your own homework and read the written answers of the fat lying bastard asked in writing by the Mueller team. I doubt you will, I suspect you’ll wait for one the fat lying bastards propaganda barkers to give you your opinion.
|
Hey, it's you making some babbling "ass"ertation without providing even a link to what you are "supposedly" quoting.
Typical bullshit lack of debate capability. Guessing your source is less than reputable if you fail to site it.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 11:51 AM
|
#321
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
this obstruction of justice thing is irrelevant if it is based on an illegal and invalid premises.
this what will come out of Durham's investigation on this Russian collusion investigation.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 01:33 PM
|
#322
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by eccielover
Hey, it's you making some babbling "ass"ertation without providing even a link to what you are "supposedly" quoting.
Typical bullshit lack of debate capability. Guessing your source is less than reputable if you fail to site it.
|
Like I said there’s a 400 page report that includes the written answers from the fat lying bastard. Had you taken the time to read the report you would know what I’m referring to. Had I posted the actual report you would scream fake news because your savior demands you do so.
Do your own fucking work!
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 01:45 PM
|
#323
|
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 11,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66
Like I said there’s a 400 page report that includes the written answers from the fat lying bastard. Had you taken the time to read the report you would know what I’m referring to. Had I posted the actual report you would scream fake news because your savior demands you do so.
Do your own fucking work!
|
I must say though, whatever your posting style, I sometimes wish credit was clear. Or clearer. I can Google the title and get the article or opinion. I do the work. But links help. Funny as fuck none the less.
Plus, I would like to know by your posts where the piece stops, and yours starts. Good shit Jax.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 01:50 PM
|
#324
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
|
Poor self-deluded DPST's
Blinded by TDS and hatred.
Seek help
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 01:50 PM
|
#325
|
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 11,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66
Steve Bannon, under oath, says Roger Stone was WikiLeaks' "access point" to Trump campaign
... when Bannon was asked why he emailed Stone on Oct 4, 2016 — the date WikiLeaks announced the dump of Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta's emails — Bannon replied, "Because Roger was the guy who knew about WikiLeaks and knew Julian Assange."
In the era of the most corrupt administration in history is Perjury even a crime. If so the fat lying bastard will have to defend his written responses to Mueller.
It ain’t over till it’s over.
|
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/roger-s...er-2019-11-08/
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 01:57 PM
|
#326
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 43,606
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66
Like I said there’s a 400 page report that includes the written answers from the fat lying bastard. Had you taken the time to read the report you would know what I’m referring to. Had I posted the actual report you would scream fake news because your savior demands you do so.
Do your own fucking work!
|
And that report has been relegated to the scrapheap of history. It’s as irrelevant as you are.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 02:18 PM
|
#327
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
|
. Full text of Mueller’s questions and Trump’s answers
SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE:
c. Are you aware of any communications during the campaign, directly or indirectly, between Roger Stone, Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, or Rick Gates and (a) WikiLeaks, (b) Julian Assange, (c) other representatives of WikiLeaks, (d) Guccifer 2.0, (e) representatives of Guccifer 2.0, or (f) representatives of DCLeaks? If yes, describe who provided you with this information, when you learned of the communications, and what you know about those communications.
TRUMP:
Response to Question II, Part (c): I do not recall being aware during the campaign of any communications between the individuals named in Question II (c) and anyone I understood to be a representative of WikiLeaks or any of the other individuals or entities referred to in the question.
https://apnews.com/98f22511be924ced895ce5c0bfedfe37
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 02:27 PM
|
#328
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino
And that report has been relegated to the scrapheap of history. It’s as irrelevant as you are.
|
That’s how fucking stupid you are, the hearing isn’t closed , the staff is working every day while the god damn trump party is pulling conspiracy theories out their aching pussies.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-10-2019, 02:42 PM
|
#330
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino
|
Typical ignorant response from the devoted piss boy troll.
Yeah the Mueller inquiry ( investigation) is closed but the House judiciary committee hasn’t closed their inquiry. Are you to fucking stupid to know the difference?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|