Quote:
Originally Posted by pjorourke
I'm sure MA or SR will be by soon.
But in the mean time, I'd like to hear the groups thoughts as to whether the management should tolerate people that drive off others by starting fights. If you are looking at things from their perspective, it would make more sense to just ban those folks and keep your audience up. Afterall, the pests don't generate any revenue for them.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
This thread at last count had 3700+ views. Not sure how that is driving off eccie's audience.
Besides you think Marshall is ok for the forum.  Not sure how you could make a credible arguement that any other poster is bannable after saying something like that  .....and no I do not want Marshall banned (or anyone else for that matter). |
I'll be happy to admit trolling for London more than a little, sorry that RL got in the way of trying to bring this thread back on topic yesterday which was my intent. Thancks to PJ and WTF for trying to do that for me.
As I've tried to beat the lovely Naomi over the head about this, it's only fair that I should extend the same courtesy to London, but I see her crap and speed post on so many threads that giving her a chance to meltdown was a little hard to pass up; sure enough she did. Now London I don't really know if this thread is going to turn out to be all about you, but I promise that when I started it that was not the intent.
There is just a chance and I know for some of the folks that make it possible for me to believe at least for a moment that we are not a complete attention hoe, this may come as quite a shock but it isn't all about you. This threAD was never intended to be all about any one person, not even me. It was intended to be a national inquiry into ethics. I actually wanted the input of the witches of eastwick too (London, Naomi and the often ignored Valerie). Not their speed posting and hijacks, which are tolerable at times but not when as they have done several times in this thread blur an interesting conversation. But that is another topic for another threAD.
Now if you are done with your desperate cries for 24/7 attention let's get back on topic please and I'll promise not to screw with you for at least the next couple of pages.
Just a quick update Naomi, it's rude to try and close someone else's threAD. I would never do that to you sugar plum, the website that was off line a couple of days ago that I alluded to is now back up. Weird would be an understatement, the timing of it all may be completely innocent but when most just see specks on a camera lens I do tend to see the reflections of little black helicopters.
Is that Heathcliff or Garfield?
