Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
401 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
282 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70825 | biomed1 | 63710 | Yssup Rider | 61274 | gman44 | 53363 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48821 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 43221 | The_Waco_Kid | 37418 | CryptKicker | 37231 | Mokoa | 36497 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
08-30-2013, 05:28 PM
|
#16
|
Upgraded Female Account
User ID: 4781
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Private Incall ~ Westchase/Memorial/Energy Corridor
Posts: 12,388
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne
umm why did I get points for a picture I pointed out to you guys? That was a screenshot I took of the friend finder ad on the border for my screen. If it violates image guidelines, perhaps you should have a talk with them! I was wondering why everytime I log in there is some random chick in the AFF ads frigging herself...
|
It is crazy as hell that you got points for that! I have all those things minimized so I can't see any of them ... ever.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-30-2013, 05:59 PM
|
#17
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Sep 28, 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,384
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brooke Wilde
It is crazy as hell that you got points for that! I have all those things minimized so I can't see any of them ... ever.
|
I run in mobile so I don't see that or the full page annoying signatures.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-30-2013, 10:29 PM
|
#18
|
Aficionado
Join Date: Dec 27, 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 33,117
|
I understand it's a screen shot of our sponsor Daphne so to leave that infraction wouldn't be right therefore it's reversed. My apologies for the tardiness on removing it I've actually been away from the keyboard to answer real world happenings.
Also I've done a bit a research here......I'll give you the difference of the image using between our sponsor ad's and showcases/provider ad's. The sponsor ad's are using these images to sell porn while which is perfectly legal. Using these sort of images in provider ad's and showcases would be using it to sell ass which is illegal.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2013, 04:52 AM
|
#19
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 27, 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,146
|
Mojojo's apology is highly commendable, even for the secondary reaction.
Now, if it was indeed a mistake to remove the graphic Daphne posted, how about putting it back....so that we could continue with the intellectual discussion as to the efficacy of it?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2013, 08:10 AM
|
#20
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 7, 2012
Location: houston
Posts: 3,802
|
What's crazy is the sponsors can show porn directly and sell porn openly but members can't even post a link to a porn video.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2013, 08:20 AM
|
#21
|
Aficionado
Join Date: Dec 27, 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 33,117
|
Poppy not exactly...
Sarunga the image was an attachment so ill wait for LD to send it back so that I can put it back on.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2013, 09:45 AM
|
#22
|
Bang! Bang an Ambassador
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,987
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by poppy71
What's crazy is the sponsors can show porn directly and sell porn openly but members can't even post a link to a porn video.
|
Key word being sponsor.
If members wanted to pay to post porn links we might could accommodate them ( My opinion only. Not an official stance)
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2013, 10:12 AM
|
#23
|
Pending Age Verification
User ID: 269367
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Downtown/ SE Houston-- Outcalls everywhere
Posts: 12,014
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Thanks mojo.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2013, 10:22 AM
|
#24
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 22, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,735
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojojo
I understand it's a screen shot of our sponsor Daphne so to leave that infraction wouldn't be right therefore it's reversed. My apologies for the tardiness on removing it I've actually been away from the keyboard to answer real world happenings.
Also I've done a bit a research here......I'll give you the difference of the image using between our sponsor ad's and showcases/provider ad's. The sponsor ad's are using these images to sell porn while which is perfectly legal. Using these sort of images in provider ad's and showcases would be using it to sell ass which is illegal.
|
Selling ass is illegal? They hell you say. Now what's this board all about? Of yeah I almost forgot it's just a SHMB.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2013, 10:34 AM
|
#25
|
Valerie's Mod Husband
Join Date: Dec 13, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 28,030
|
You guys might want to actually think before you post...
#12 - Respect the posted "Image Standards" which apply to our public coed forums. (including Showcase) In short, images which depict subjects which are topless are allowed, but below the waist nudity which displays exposed genitalia or images depicting pornography are to be avoided. Additionally, posting URL links to external sites depicting pornography is not permitted. (use RTM to report images which you feel may not be in compliance)
Where does it say anything about a difference between pornography being legal and prostitution being illegal? It says exposed genitalia or pornography isn't to be shown in public forums. That's it.
Under the rule, it's perfectly okay to say that the ads are not pictures posted in public coed forums and hence aren't covered by then rule. However, once a member posts the picture of that ad in a public coed forum, it becomes a violation. There's no room for interpretation in the rule as written, no matter what you may think. If you don't want to give points because its a picture from your own ad section, that's fine, your call, but the image is still in violation of the forum guidelines...
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
08-31-2013, 11:04 AM
|
#26
|
Dr. Wonderful
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: Globe Trotter
Posts: 27,216
|
Heh
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2013, 11:15 AM
|
#27
|
Pending Age Verification
User ID: 269367
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Downtown/ SE Houston-- Outcalls everywhere
Posts: 12,014
My ECCIE Reviews
|
I've heard of dumbing it down but very rarely have I seen anyone dumb it up.
I should buy a lottery ticket today.
mojo I couldn't pm it to you, I guess you can't pm attachments? too lazy for photobucket right now. this is the pic in question.
on a side note, we have got to find 3 sides another avatar. sheesh.
aff.png
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2013, 11:29 AM
|
#28
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 22, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,735
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wakeuр
You guys might want to actually think before you post...
#12 - Respect the posted "Image Standards" which apply to our public coed forums. (including Showcase) In short, images which depict subjects which are topless are allowed, but below the waist nudity which displays exposed genitalia or images depicting pornography are to be avoided. Additionally, posting URL links to external sites depicting pornography is not permitted. (use RTM to report images which you feel may not be in compliance)
Where does it say anything about a difference between pornography being legal and prostitution being illegal? It says exposed genitalia or pornography isn't to be shown in public forums. That's it.
Under the rule, it's perfectly okay to say that the ads are not pictures posted in public coed forums and hence aren't covered by then rule. However, once a member posts the picture of that ad in a public coed forum, it becomes a violation. There's no room for interpretation in the rule as written, no matter what you may think. If you don't want to give points because its a picture from your own ad section, that's fine, your call, but the image is still in violation of the forum guidelines...
|
A few points of order.
The English languuge is a mother fucker.
It's not a rule it's a guideline. Look it up they don't have the same meaning.
"are to be avoided". That's a grey statement. If it was written 'are not to be permitted" as it is for porn links it would be different.
The bottom line is really about the bottom line. Members aren't supposed to post porn or links to it to protect the boards business of selling advertising space to porn sites.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2013, 11:37 AM
|
#29
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 7, 2012
Location: houston
Posts: 3,802
|
Thanks mojojo for clearing that up...works for me.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-31-2013, 12:34 PM
|
#30
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Sep 11, 2010
Location: Any Where USA
Posts: 1,899
|
Thanks Mojojo for reversing her points. I have seen the same photo and similar nude photos, popup on the side. I didn't understand why she got points for taking a screen shot and posting it.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|